Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Illinois Supreme Court Reverses $10B Verdict Against Philip Morris

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 12:45 PM
Original message
Illinois Supreme Court Reverses $10B Verdict Against Philip Morris
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. -- The Illinois Supreme Court threw out a $10 billion class-action lawsuit against Philip Morris USA on Thursday, ruling that the company that makes top-selling Marlboros and other brands did not defraud customers in its marketing of "light" cigarettes.

The court reversed the verdict and sent the case back to Madison County court with instruction to dismiss the matter.

A divided state Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Trade Commission specifically allowed companies to characterize their cigarettes as "light" and "low tar," so Altria Group Inc.'s Philip Morris unit did not improperly mislead customers about the health impacts of its cigarettes.

"If the FTC has specifically authorized the use of the terms .... PM USA (Philip Morris) may not be held liable under the Consumer Fraud Act, even if the terms might be deemed false, deceptive or misleading," Justice Rita Garman wrote for the majority.

<SNIP>

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/money/5542537/detail.html?rss=den&psp=money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. so the U.S. government gave tobaco companies authorization...
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 12:58 PM by mike_c
...to deceptively market a product responsible for killing tens or hundreds of thousands and causing billions of dollars in health care costs. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Just as it authorizes tobacco in the first place.
The only drug and drug delivery system expressly outside FDA jurisidiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hyernel Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The best "justice" money can buy.
Sad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ding ding ding -- we have a winner.
and i'm a smoker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. What's the breakdown of the IL Supreme Court?
I'd think they'd be more Dems/liberals, am I wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Democrats have a majority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tobacco giant wins damages appeal
Friday, December 16, 2005. 8:07am (AEDT)

A court has overturned a ruling that Philip Morris knowingly misled smokers by marketing light cigarettes as safer than regular ones. (ABC TV)

Tobacco giant wins damages appeal
By North America correspondent Michael Rowland

Tobacco manufacturer Philip Morris has scored a significant legal victory with a US court reversing a $13 billion damages ruling over the marketing of light cigarettes.

The Illinois Supreme Court has overturned a lower court's ruling that Philip Morris knowingly misled smokers by marketing light cigarettes as safer than regular ones.

The tobacco giant appealed against the judgment, claiming it was not the company's fault if smokers took deeper breaths or smoked more cigarettes to make up for lower nicotine levels.

In accepting the appeal, the Supreme Court ruled that Philip Morris could not be accused of defrauding consumers as the US Government specifically authorised tobacco companies to describe their light cigarettes as low in nicotine.
(snip/...)

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200512/s1532197.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC