Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Former Gov. Lowell) Weicker targets Bush, Lieberman and Iraq war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:27 PM
Original message
(Former Gov. Lowell) Weicker targets Bush, Lieberman and Iraq war

http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--weickercriticism1205dec05,0,3028571.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut

Weicker targets Bush, Lieberman and Iraq war

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Former Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr. said Monday that Sen. Joe Lieberman deserves a stiff challenge in next year's re-election campaign, though he said he would not take up a grudge match against the Democrat who ousted him from the U.S. Senate in 1988.
...

"I have seen this country propagandized into war," Weicker said. "It's now a second wave of propagandizing, with the president taking the stump, joined by persons like Senator Joe Lieberman."

...

Weicker said U.S. troops should be removed from Iraq in six months to a year.
"I support the troops. I do not support the commander in chief," he said.

Of Lieberman, he said: "I disagree 100 percent with the position he has taken on this war. The nation does not need a Democrat to second the president's policy."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Honestly - I will not mind Weicker replacing Liebermann .... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Did you miss that HE'S NOT RUNNING?
(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
J-Hen Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's too bad
This is the same man you kept calling an "asswipe" the other day. Lowell Weicker is a progressive fighting on our side when it comes to issues such as trade, health care, and the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. And he's not a Democrat
so he can go fuck himself, as far as I'm concerned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Neither is your hero Lieberman!
Weicker is honest and independent, Holy Joe is neither!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. [r hero Lieberman]
*delete*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
40. Says you....
Of course, the Connecticut Democratic party begs to differ....

http://dems.info/index2.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #40
68. Yeah - this repuke in dino clothing scolds all of us who dare criticize
the AWOL pResident or his policies - AGAIN!

Some democrat!

I'd rather have a progressive to replace this conservative asswipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I have listened to him quite often and would support him any day
over Lieberman!! Do you remember he helped bring down nixon in watergate???

Weiker puts country first not ideology... and he is an independent!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
41. Whoop-dee-fucking-doo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. He left the republican party years ago - he is an independent.
wonder who, were he to run (which he isn't) and win, he would caucus with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. And he's not a Democrat and he's not running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. He's no longer a Republican, either
Although even when he was he was almost always on the side of right.

Don't be so quick to dismiss the man. He's a tough son of a gun, but not afraid to say the things most people won't say. Or do them.

He's an independent, and I'd happily vote for him again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
43. He's not running either....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #43
52. Well, paper this morning now says
that he's considering it if someone else doesn't jump in.

I was pretty surprised at that.

The article also said that Weicker had been approached by some known Dems. about running themselves, but he didn't name names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #52
59. I am sure that MoveOn and other progressive groups
will rally around Weicker were he to challenge Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. not gonna win many middle-of-the-roaders over with that attitude
:evilgrin:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. Don't need to--they're already there
I'll remind you Lieberman has 69% approval ratings in Connecticut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. He is the ONLY republican senator I ever supported over a dem
back in 1988. I wish he would run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. He said he would not rule out running
Edited on Mon Dec-05-05 10:51 PM by NewJeffCT
if no viable alternative to Lieberman came about. And, none have, and the Republicans will not have any viable options, either.

No link on that, but he was on local radio today (WTIC AM 1080)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Please let it be... !
I can not imagine that he would, as an independent and maverick, caucus with the republicans... likely to be like Jeffords. Thus a slightly more liberal senator from Connecticut than Lieberman, with no net loss of voting power in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
J-Hen Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. NYT: Weicker May Run against Lieberman
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/06/nyregion/metrocampaigns/06weicker.html?adxnnl=1&oref=login&adxnnlx=1133848689-OOc2F+OZ1cm8cqIGHe3Lgg

HARTFORD, Dec. 5 - Former Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr. on Monday criticized Senator Joseph I. Lieberman's continued support of the war in Iraq and said that if no candidate challenged the senator on the issue in the 2006 election, he would consider running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #36
57. I'd consider voting for Weicker on basis of his get out of Iraq stand
BUT---I'd like to know what else he stands for. He's right, though, that Iraq will be the Big Issue in next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
J-Hen Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
37. Looks like you may still have to deal with him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Weicker is a Pub, isn't he?
I've been reading that he might challenge Leiberman in 06, but what's the deal with slamming Shrub?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. he was - but I thought he went independent. Conn is true blue -
69% hate Bush, so I can't believe we can't get a super progressive. Weicker would be good if we can not. Much better than Joe-Mo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
55. Weicker is unaffiliated---formed A Connecticut Party after loss to JoeMo
"Weicker, who acquired a reputation as a maverick even before leaving the GOP two years after his stunning loss to Lieberman to form A Connecticut Party and win the governor's office, said more candidates who are unaffiliated with either major party should seek public office. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
56. CT not true blue--Repuke Gov. John the Con Rowland and now his deputy
Repuke, Jodi Rell, are running the state. And we have to contend with JoeMo, too, who is lately BushCo's No. 1 man in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. but her approval rating is sky high
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
J-Hen Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. No he is no longer a Republican
He endorsed Bill Bradley in the 2000 election and Dean in 2004. Though even as a Republican he was more liberal than Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Weicker is an independent
Lieberman is the one that is a repuke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fantastic
This kind of stuff can definitely hurt Loserman, and possibly hurt him enough to get a challenger into the race. I suspect that may be Weicker's intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. My Parents voted for Weicker.
1976:
President: Carter (D)
Senate: Weicker (R)

1982:
Governor: O'Neill (D)
Senate: Weicker (R)

1988:
President: Dukaukis (D)
Senate: Weicker (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. I moved here in time for the 88 race and happily
voted for him then.

I voted for him for Gov. as well. I also happily supported Eunice Groark (his Lt. Gov.) when she made her run for governor.

Sometimes the person is more important than the party. See Joe Lieberman if you want proof!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Liberman is scum... kissed by Bush!!! and we all know why!!!
theres no getting around it he sold out his country!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Hopefully it was the "kiss"
of death(politically speaking) for joe-ho!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Move On needs to challenge Smokin Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. His record is outstanding see below.
http://scs.student.virginia.edu/~decweb/issue/1997/04/17/word/political.html
Lowell P. Weicker, graduate of Yale University and Virginia Law, was a United States Congressman and Senator from Connecticut.
He first gained national recognition for berating members of his own Republican party while serving on the Congressional investigation of Watergate
. After losing his seat in 1988, he successfully ran for Governor of Connecticut as an independent.
He has been the recipient of the Wayne Morse Political Integrity Award (1988)
and the John F. Kennedy Profiles in Courage Award (1992).

A major opponent of prayer in schools, Weicker has always had a reverential attitude for the founding fathers of the Constitution and their stance on the separation of church and state. He pointed out, "All you have to do is look at Bosnia and Northern Ireland -- and that's what happens when you mix religion and politics."

In many articles over the years, he has pointed out that if the founding fathers had not acted against their own self interest, we would still live in a nation ruled by twenty tobacco planters and five New England merchants. "It's sad how few people nowadays you can find who are willing to act against their own self interest. That's what we need right now."

He currently resides in Alexandria,Va. and teaches two classes here at U.Va.: a Constitutional Law class at the Law School and a University Seminar called, "Politics: a High or Low Calling." Weicker's class is designed to encourage students that they can make a career in government and still hold on to their integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Lowell was a "Maverick"
Edited on Mon Dec-05-05 06:14 PM by connecticut yankee
The Repukes hated him. He always voted his conscience.

He angered many of the conservatives with his outspoken comments, and he was on the panel that indicted Nixon.

When Lieberman ran against him in 1988, William F. Buckley formed "Buckpac" and raised money to help Joe win. Buckley's often said that Lieberman is his favorite Democrat.

That really shows the kind of Democrat Lieberman is. The Dems in lower Fairfield County can't stand him.

Weicker got back at them by forming his own "A Connecticut Party" and won the Governor's race in 1990. He didn't run for a second term.

The Repukes never put up a strong candidate against Lieberman. They didn't have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. So back in '88 william
Edited on Mon Dec-05-05 07:12 PM by zidzi
freakin' buckley wanted joe lieman to be the dem senator from Connecticut? Hmm..what does that tell me about ol' kissy up to bush joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Weiker for Gov. was my first chance to vote, I was 20 and proud to vote
for an independant.... As I have gotten older (now 35) I have always been interested in his opion, as I have become more and more progressive....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Weicker never ran for a 2nd term because he never would have won
(snip)

When did it really start going downhill? Pretty clearly, it was when former GOP Senator Lowell Weicker was elected governor of Connecticut in 1990. Prior to Weicker’s reign, Connecticut was one of the few last holdouts with no state income tax (or at least, earned income tax). Weicker ran for governor as an independent, on a clear campaign of opposing an income tax. Once elected, of course, he abandoned this pledge and became an income-tax crusader. He got the tax enacted; then, after massive protests, the legislature repealed it, but Weicker vetoed the repeal. Among other things, we can thank governor Weicker for the fact that Connecticut was the only state in the union to actually lose population between the censuses of 1990 and 2000.

http://www.claremont.org/weblog/002888.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. wonder how their bottom dollar
(state deficits) compare to those of non-income state taxes; wonder how the services compare. In the climate of 1994, I can fully understand the backlash... (14 years of reaganistic randian propoganda)... have to wonder what the sentiment would be today...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I'm not an economist
but I'm of the impression that they've spent their way into oblivion with all the new revenue.

I left there just before Weicker came in, but I don't know any Dems there who were happy about that income tax, and they're still bitter about it. No one minded the jai alai, the Indian casino, the dog track, or the lottery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
67. Wow, you forgot the 2 beginning paragraphs and the TITLE!
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 08:50 PM by PassingFair
(sans snip!)

Civil Unions and the Demise of a Once-Decent State

It has almost become embarrassing to admit that I’m a native of Connecticut. The latest blow to this once-decent place to live is the impending passage by the state legislature of a law allowing same-sex civil unions – which would make it the second state to do so, although the first to do so without a court order.

While many red-staters simply consider Connecticut to be indistinguishable from Massachusetts, its neighbor to the north, it wasn’t always so. True, Connecticut has for a long time been a blue-collar Democratic state; but growing up there, we used to make fun of the liberalism in Massachusetts, and especially of its liberal tax policies, for which it was dubbed “Tax-achusetts.” And, even in 1988, Connecticut voted for Bush over neighboring Massachusets governor Dukakis.

When did it really start going downhill? Pretty clearly, it was when former GOP Senator Lowell Weicker was elected governor of Connecticut in 1990. Prior to Weicker’s reign, Connecticut was one of the few last holdouts with no state income tax (or at least, earned income tax)....

I'm off to google the claremont people....

ON EDIT!!!

Fine resources you're using there!

http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo38.html

"If there was ever any doubt over whether the Claremont Institute was anything but a propaganda shill for the Republican Party, Ken Masugi erased it with his recent fawning and swooning over President Bush’s state of the union address. In a January 29 article on the Institute’s web site he gushes over Bush’s speech like a school girl smitten by puppy love...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. Weicker got elected as an anti-Vietnam war Republican in 1968!
He ran against a pro war Democrat in running for US Congress.

When Lieberman ran for Senate in 1988, Lieberman ran to Weicker's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
54. And Lieberman won that election
CT is a blue state, but it is a moderate state also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
31. Good for Mr Weicker
Some real Democrat needs to take Loserman's seat away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
32. Weicker has my vote!!!....I use to live there. I wish I did now!!!
Kick Joe permanently out of office....
whether elected or appointed!!!

NO MORE NON-USA SPIES!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. "...though he did not slam the door entirely "
"You're not going to tell somebody in politics for 32 years you have no interest at all," he said. "I would hope, however, that the Democratic party exercises some choices."

Others in the Democratic Party who are considering a race have called him seeking his support, he said after his 15-minute talk. Weicker did not identify them.

The war in Iraq will be the primary issue, he said. "It's the war. Make no mistake about it."

He derided Democrats as "a bunch of wimps" who are as bad as Bush.

"It's a one-party deal. That's what we've come to," Weicker said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hezekkia Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
34. I'd support Weicker
but only if he caucuses with the Dems!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. He should join the Democratic Party already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. Exactly....
Otherwise he can go screw....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
66. So Lieberman is wonderful because he calls himself a Dem and Weicker
is evil incarnate because he's an independent? Sorry but I care about issues, I'm not into blind obedience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
45. Weicker: Anti-War Candidate? (may challenge Lieberman)
Weicker: Anti-War Candidate?
He Lost His U.S. Senate Seat To Joe Lieberman. At 74, He May Try To Win It Back
December 6, 2005
By MARK PAZNIOKAS, Courant Staff Writer

Lowell P. Weicker Jr. is 74 and walks with a cane these days, but he may have one more run left in him - as an anti-war candidate against the Democrat who took away his Senate seat in 1988, Joseph I. Lieberman.

In the blogosphere and on talk radio, the left has been casting about for months for someone to oppose Lieberman's re-election in 2006 over his support of President Bush and the war in Iraq.

Weicker told reporters Monday after a speaking engagement before the Hartford Rotary Club that he reluctantly would consider taking on that role, but only if no other credible anti-war candidate stepped forward.

"I have a very settled life at this stage of the game," said Weicker, who is retired and living in Essex with his wife, Claudia. "I am not at all anxious to jump back into the arena of politics."

http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-weicker1206.artdec06,0,6569786.story?coll=hc-headlines-local
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. I am an ABC person
That is: Anybody But Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. The only thing that scares me is...
when Rowland got elected in 1994, he basically won on a split vote between Independents & Democrats in a 3 way race.

The article implies one of the top Republicans in the state may get into the race if Weicker also gets in... so, we'd have the liberal Weicker, moderate Lieberman splitting the 65% of the vote and a conservative Republican maybe winning with like 35%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. A loss wouldn't necessarily put Lieberman on the sidelines
If a DLC-type candidate won the presidential election, then they would probably employ him in some capacity. Remember Ashcroft....

So vote him out if you can Conn., but don't assume that will be the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. maybe, but in my view liberman in the last six years
has voted mostly with the republicans anyway so what does it matter?

He voted for the bankrupcy law, the IWR, the Patriot act.

Could you educate me and tell me in the last six years what progressive issues he has voted on?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #49
65. Here is Lieberman on the issues
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 07:34 PM by NewJeffCT
He is rated 100% by NARAL, meaning strongly pro-choice (the guy many on DU orgasm over - Chuck Hagel - was rated 0% by NARAL)

Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)
Voted NO on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)
Voted NO on disallowing overseas military abortions. (May 1999)
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)
Expand embryonic stem cell research. (Jun 2004)

He is rated 0% by the Christian Coalition. Again, the guy that DU orgasms over - Chuck Hagel - is rated 100% by the Christian Coalition.

Rated 100% regarding votes on public health issues.
Rated 100% by the AFL-CIO, indicating a pro-labor voting record.

Said "flag burning is abhorrent, but not a constitutional issue", which puts him to the left of Hillary. He also voted against drilling in ANWR.

While I hate his stance on Iraq, he has done okay on a lot of other issues.

http://www.issues2000.org/Joseph_Lieberman.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. And TODAY he just kissed bunkerboy's ass AGAIN while at the same time
slamming the rest of the democratic party for DARING to criticize this AWOL CRIMNAL pResident!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Yes, but
Weicker ran for Governor as "A Connecticut Party" candidate in 1990 and won, taking votes from both Democrats and Republicans.

When Rowland ran in 1994, it was against Weicker's Lieutenant Governor, Eunice Groark. She ran a distant third.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
51. "74 and walking with a cane." All the old guys--the fighters, the
antiwar activists, the anti-Nixonites--are coming forth to save us. Jimmy Carter, in his 80s--his new anti-Bush book about American values is huge (sold out all over UTAH, I just heard--of all places!). And I just heard 84 year old Fr. Dan Berrigan (burner of Draft records in the '60s, fugitive on "ten most wanted list," Jesuit priest--still) on the Alan Colmbs show a couple of days ago, planning to get arrested over the Iraq war (he wouldn't say where/when).

Weicker was a better Democrat than many Democrats. He very much opposed the Vietnam War. (i don't think he'll let the vote get split. He wants a good Dem to run.)

What's happened to Connecticut? It used to be a great liberal state. Now it has two bad, bad Dems, might as well be Repubs--Dodd (of the Bilderberg Group and the Diebold/ES&S electronic voting scam) and Lieberman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #51
63. What is wrond with the Bilderberg Group?
Many Democrats (including John Edwards) have attended Bilderberg meetings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
53. Lieberman beat him once before by running as a centrist
opposing the liberal Weicker. My guess is that that Weicker knows better and won't run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #53
61. Lieberman fooled a lot of people back then
We now know the sort of scumbag that Lieberman is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. He ran as a centrist
and delivered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. He delivered the war in Iraq, PATRIOT, and torture
He was kissed by Bush on both cheeks. He went to Iraq and came back with a glowing report that outdid Rumsfeld's drug-induced optimistic pronouncements.

Holy Joe delivered alright!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. And he continues to CRITICIZE OTHER DEMOCRATS
while kissing bunkerboy's sticky slimy brown ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #64
71. Most of the Democrats in Congress supported the PATRIOT Act
Including paul Wellstone. Were were the calls for his head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
60. RUN LOWELL RUN!!!!
I'd donate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC