|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
SillyGoose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 08:37 PM Original message |
Secrecy order in CIA leak case challenged by media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Dow Jones can go fuck themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. What was the verdict? n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SillyGoose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 09:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. No mention of any outcome in the article. The papers were filed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. I wonder why.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Dow Jones afraid BushCo stock going down as more indictments near |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
7. WSJ trying to delay the trial until after 2006 elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I think John Fund is leading the charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 10:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 10:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. John Fund has a hard time zipping up pants without catching his peter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 09:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. HA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. asshole John Scum is either on Bush payroll or he's just stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. what does getting the docs have to do with delay past '06 elections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
auburngrad82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Great. I want it to be an issue in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barrett808 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. No, WSJ would never do something underhanded like that! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
11. Media certainly can cover secrecy of leak case but not secrecy of WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RazzleDazzle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-14-05 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. They should be careful what they ask for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
13. Dow Jones (WSJ publisher) Seeks Access To (Fitz's) Documents In Libby Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. they will find out at the trials - Dow Jones interfering with case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC