Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dobson 'Extremely Pleased' by Alito Nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:30 PM
Original message
Dobson 'Extremely Pleased' by Alito Nomination

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=55900

Dobson 'Extremely Pleased' by Alito Nomination; Says Circuit Judge 'Understands the Role of the Judiciary'


COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo., Oct. 31 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Focus on the Family Action founder and chairman James C. Dobson, Ph.D., issued the following statement today about the nomination of Circuit Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court:

"We are extremely pleased by President Bush's selection of Judge Samuel Alito, who has earned the respect of colleagues in both parties for his legal acumen and courtroom demeanor. As a federal judge for the last 15 years, Judge Alito has demonstrated that he understands the role of the judiciary is to interpret existing law in light of the Constitution, not make new law in service to a personal political agenda.

"Perhaps the most encouraging early indication that Judge Alito will make a great justice is that liberal senators such as Harry Reid and Charles Schumer and leftist pressure groups such as People for the American Way and Planned Parenthood have been lining up all day to scream that the sky is falling. Any nominee who so worries the radical left is worthy of serious consideration.

"Based on what is now known about Judge Alito, we applaud the president for this outstanding nomination."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. That pretty much settles it for me
the guy is a disaster for our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Filibuster anyone?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twaddler01 Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. hopefully! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. i'm with you there, grannie!
if dobson loves it, i hate it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Why does Dobsons point of view matter in this country.
These Reich wingers make me puke. Focus on the family, whose family Dobson you ASSHAT. Maybe Dobson has the naughty photos of Cheney/Gannon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. Why? Because Dobson = Litmus Test...
Anyone that's A-OK with him must be D.O.A. with the Dems and any moderate conservative. It's difficult to be harder right than Dobson without going over the edge of batshit crazy like Fred Phelps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. To me Dobson is the new head of the Christian Taliban.
Robertson is no longer relevant, after his kill Hugo spew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. So is that why he was a dissenting opinion to reverse Roe v Wade?
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 05:36 PM by merwin
I forgot what state, but Franken mentioned that he was one of the dissenting opinions.

Not make new laws, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He was the lone dissenter
in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. This was about a law that required women to notify the child's father before having an abortion.

He then, surprisingly, ruled that partial-birth abortions were Constitutional.

But there are two other cases which worry me...

He ruled that female students who were physically sexually abused, including touching and sodomization, by fellow students during the course of a class do not have a cause of action under 42 U.S.C 1983 because the state does not have a special duty of caring for them. 42 U.S.C. 1983 allows for civil action for deprivation of rights.

He was the lone dissenter in US v. Rybar which upheld a federal statute making it "unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machine gun." Alito would have stricken the law as unsupported by the Commerce Clause powers of Congress. In other words, in his view, we all have a Constitutional right to own a machine gun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErisFiveFingers Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. PP vs Casey wasn't about the father...
Here:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=505&invol=833

It did *not* require the child's father be notified.

It required that a married womans' *husband* be notified, if the pregnancy was his, and if such notification would not present a threat to the physical health of the woman, and it wasn't a product of the husband raping her (reported), and such notification was reasonably possible.

Scalito basically argued that signing a form in a Dr.'s office wasn't a big deal, the USSC disagreed, because it might discourage women in a number of other ways (unreported rape by husband, threats to mental health rather than physical, etc.).

IIRC, in the student case, I believe his argument was that the school itself shouldn't be sued.. not that the students had no case, just that their case wasn't a civil rights case against the school...

His view of the commerce clause is typical of the right wing, where they argue against federal regulation of a great number of things, such as EPA laws, Endagered Species Act, the FDA, USDA, etc. Basically, any form of interaction. Guns are no exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. Ah, nothing like old fashioned family values....
"In other words, in his view, we all have a Constitutional right to own a machine gun."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yep. This tells the tale! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. OK, we can skip the confirmation process now
Thanks for saving the taxpayers a lot of money, SpongeDob!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well lah di dah...God is smiling on us now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Radical Fundamentalist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Welp, that's all I needed to know
If that batshit crazy motherfucker likes him, he can take a leap off the Washington Monument for all I care, he'll never, ever see my support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did Dobson have advance word on this one, too?
Have we reached the point where every potential nomination must be vetted by a scary medieval bible-thumper?! :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. thanks god our shadow emperor is happy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's why we need term limits on SCOTUS, move approval to the House, and
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 06:36 PM by jody
require at least two thirds vote to approve a nominee.

Amendments to our Constitution require 3/4 of the states approve them and SCOTUS through its interpretations makes the law just as effectively and more easily that going through the Amendment process prescribed by our Constitution.

AS it stands today, worst case scenario, 2% of the population could prevent an Amendment but 8% of the population with their Senators could approve a rogue president's nomination for Supreme Court Justice, a life time job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I agree it should be a 4year term limit just like the President.
Lifetime appointments are just wrong and this one can do way to much damage to our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. He is so happy, he decided to kick the puppy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. ...which alone should keep him the fuck away from any judgeship
Dobson: "As a federal judge for the last 15 years, Judge Alito has demonstrated that he understands the role of the judiciary is to interpret existing law in light of the Constitution, not make new law in service to a personal political agenda."

Every Day is Opposite Day in Theofascistland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. "in light of the Constitution" as we define it as God's spokesperson. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. just so these religious fuckers can supercede my religious rights?
Screw them all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Operation Rescue statement from NARAL site:
"We are trusting that we are now on the fast-track to derailing Roe v. Wade as the law of the land," -- Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. Anyone Dobson is for, I'm afraid of!
Dobson's word reminds me of those people who thought that beating a woman with a stick was OK as long as it wasn't as big as your thumb in diameter AKA Absive nasty people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. Now there's a big red flag about Alito
hope the Dems in the Senate are paying attention. It's kinda hard to miss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99Pancakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. But if the Dems filibuster...
the Repukes will move for an up or down vote.

This Alito nomination truly scares me, and it goes beyond Roe v Wade. Imagine how badly he'll trash our other hard won rights? We're talking Roberts and Alito for 30 years!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bite me, Jim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. Another one disqualified
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well, it certain lays wide open the fact that Dobson is purely a political
animal ... and not an nice little PhD with a family 'ministry.'

Because the sentiments expressed by him are very ugly, and not in the least Christian, or in any way related to the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth.

If he released this on Focus's 501-c-3 letterhead, then FOF's tax exempt status should be revoked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Dobson's Theocratic Terrorist Training Camp has it's own ZIP Code
Fundamentalist Extremest James Dobson has operated a Theocratic Terrorist Training Camp for over 20 years now. Known to the faithful as "Focus on the Family", it conducts training of political operatives specializing in honing hatred toward infidels, liberals and homosexuals. Dobson initially developed his organization by focusing on the teaching that parents should beat their children, in the name of the Lord.

Lately Dobson has made the news by 'outing' and issuing Fatwas on cartoon characters such as Sponge Bob Square Pants and Shrek for their (covert) support of the nefarious 'homosexual agenda'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Yep, that's Dobson.
Well - to the individual that has anything to do with him or his writings - shame on them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
30. Radical Cleric James Dobson praises Alito, issues Fatwa on Activist Judges
Fundamentalist Radical Clerics such as Falwell, Dobson, and Robertson are not merely medieval throwbacks or misguided religious hacks. They are part of a well organized subversionary movement known as "Dominionism".

Dominionism constitutes a serious threat to American Democracy. These Radical Clerics have developed and are executing a detailed plan to gradually replace the free, secular democratic society of the United States with a Theocracy.

It is critical that people become aware of the extreme agenda these people have for the United States and ultimately for the world. The results of the 2004 Presidential Election were not a fluke or something that was drummed up over a period of months. It has been in planning for over 20 years, and what we are seeing take place now is, in the words of Katherine Yurica, "the swift advance of a planned coup".

The Swift Advance of a Planned Coup: Conquering by Stealth and Deception - How the Dominionists Are Succeeding in Their Quest for National Control and World Power
http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/TheSwiftAdvanceOfaPlannedCoup.htm

The Despoiling of America: How George W. Bush became the head of the new American Dominionist Church/State
http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/TheDespoilingOfAmerica.htm

The Rise of the Religious Right in the Republican Party
a public information project from TheocracyWatch.org

http://www.theocracywatch.org

The Religious Right - An Anti-American Terrorist Movement
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8816.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. He was so tickled he flogged Siggy the Dachshund...
There you have it. Bush has gone and nominated Cotton Mather to the SCROTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. Concerned Women of America also think he's peachy...
Judge Alito has always been one of our top choices for the Supreme Court,” said Jan LaRue, CWA’s chief counsel. “He has all of the qualifications needed: intellect, knowledge and experience in constitutional law, integrity, competence, humility and judicial temperament.”

“Since about half of the current members of the Democratic caucus confirmed Alito in 1990, he should sail through to confirmation by an overwhelming majority. Judge Alito will help swing the Court back to the Constitution and restore the only balance that matters,” LaRue concluded.

“We congratulate President Bush on an excellent choice. We urge the Senate to hold fair and dignified hearings and a speedy vote for this worthy nominee,” said Mrs. Beverly LaHaye, founder and chairman of CWA.


www.cwfa.org/courts.asp

Beverly LaHaye, wife of Tim ("Left Behind") LaHaye founded CWA to fight the Equal Rights Amendment. The group remains as a fount of Religious Right thought. Here's some good stuff on the LaHayes & Dobson, dug up by some very bright & politicized witches(!) in Georgia:

www.tylwythteg.com/enemies/LaHaye/general.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Interesting piece on the LaHayes.
Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
35. oh, well, great! As long as Dobson is happy.
What else could this country want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
36. Can't really add to what's already been said
but if Dobson is extremely pleased, we need to oppose Alito tooth and nail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
37. Fight Fight Fight
We have to fight these people. These are people who are so loony they would rather see women get cervical cancer than have safe sex. It's a moral imperative for our representatives to represent us here and resist the right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
40. Mission Accomplished - the overseer is extremely pleased
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
42. Nothing wrong with life terms for fed judges
Nobody here has been bitching about Ruth Bader Ginsberg serving a life term on the Court. Let's TRY to be more consistent than the Pukes. Nobody here has been bitching about Kennedy serving on the Court for life. Why? They're "our" justices. Of course the Pukes were screaming about Kennedy once he left the reservation!

The life term works both ways. The way to control the judiciary, esp. SCOTUS, is to win elections, both the WH and Senate. The lifetime appointment is SUPPOSED to remove the judiciary from politics as usual. Amazingly, it seemed to have worked with Kennedy.

Bake, Esq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC