|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 03:07 AM Original message |
Libby Lawyer Plans Lack-Of-Memory Defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 03:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. and especially when the questions in question are of a sensitive and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagickMuffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. He lied and he KNOWS he Lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShockediSay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 03:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. Careful; Reagan used that defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shockingelk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:32 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Yeah, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
53. They need to save this defense for Dumbya's trial for treason and war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. Libby was a prominent Washington lawyer with a notorious memory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 03:59 AM Response to Original message |
4. Well, I guess it's better than a Lack-of-Integrity defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 08:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
33. Isn't this the Ollie North defense. I do not recall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 09:41 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. AND John Dean..."To the best of my recollection, I can't recall" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:13 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Said to by his defence attorney to be their star witness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:25 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Didn't Sharon Stone study films of her for "Fatal Attraction"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:29 AM Response to Reply #43 |
61. I don't ken, but there was a constant twinkle in the eyes of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. Sgt. Shultz defense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. LOL...that's needs a photoshop with Libby's face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
driver8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. OMG -- that would be perfect. It would make a great t-shirt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
51. A quickie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:43 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Hey, that works! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
54. I'm waiting for the 'naming names' part. How long will the various |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bballny (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. didn't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
26. But who's Commandant Klink? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shockingelk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:29 AM Response to Original message |
8. TAKE HIM TO GITMO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. Except that at the time he made the false statements, it had only been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeunderdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:28 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. He was told on THREE separate occasions about Plame's status. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:22 AM Response to Reply #20 |
42. "If this defense worked, no one could be convicted..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
49. It could be called the FEMA Defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 08:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
29. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. It worked for Reagon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 05:16 AM Response to Original message |
13. Mr. Photographic Memory? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sgent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
15. Just a question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 09:36 AM Response to Reply #15 |
35. Yes and maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheGunslinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:29 AM Response to Original message |
16. Someone start slipping some Gingko Biloba in his food. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:49 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. lots of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cureautismnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
19. Oh, sure. I'm always confusing Crashcart with Tim Russert. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maeve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
21. It's the Steve Martin defense--"I forgot it was illegal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
22. "lack of memory" will not work with other admin statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
23. That's why they don't want more stringent testing for mad cow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
24. "I don't recall" is one thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Plus, Libby's testimony had a ring of certainty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 09:39 AM Response to Reply #25 |
36. That's the weird thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 08:19 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Being Asked to Step Forward in Summer of 2003 Is Another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LizW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 08:29 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Exactly. Why didn't he say, "I can't remember," when he testified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
27. "Oh- uh... I FORGOT!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildflowergardener (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
31. Pardons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I_am_Spartacus (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
32. As the indictments suggest, however, why did Scooter's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharlo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
34. Well then, based upon Mr. Schweitzer's definition, Libby's a happy man: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
38. maybe when the witnesses arrive at the trial, i.e. Cheney, Rove, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
39. We all know Al Capone had memory losses about his tax forms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
40. Surely, it's not a matter of remembering what one has said, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twaddler01 (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
44. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twaddler01 (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
45. there is a difference between memory and lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnydrama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:33 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. no chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryallen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
47. Libby's case will NEVER go to trial ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. don't be so pessimistic---WE the PEOPLE will haul him up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
48. how on earth does this defense help his client??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
52. That's a hoot...in the day of e-mails and recorded conversations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
55. Libby Said to Concoct Story in Leak Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disgruntled_goat (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. alchemy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Its because of the word concoct!!! Sorry don't want to insult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. LOL. Yep. This administration as amateur alchemists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TaleWgnDg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. But, but . . . "I don't recall." . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Makes you wonder what else he lied about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC