Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source: No announcement in CIA leak probe today (CNN)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:42 AM
Original message
Source: No announcement in CIA leak probe today (CNN)
http://www.cnn.com/

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald is not expected to make a public announcement today about the CIA leak investigation, a source with knowledge of the investigation tells CNN. Experts say it's possible the grand jury still may consider indictments and, if it votes to return one or more, the indictments could remain under seal and be made public later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. With bush in the White House they will probably remain under seal...
NEVER to be made public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Damn.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Breaking News!!!111 No news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
60. Thrice a day, every day.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. If we're sweating, think about how those bastards must feel... tee hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. i'd send them some Pepto Bismo but would prob. get arrested as a
terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfresh Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. I could really use something by Friday
Two and a half years for this crap... the suspense is killing me! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let the traitorous bastards sweat for 2 more days! Casual speculation:
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 10:55 AM by johnfunk
1) The Grand Jury is still mulling evidence and putting the pieces together;

2) Traitors may still be trying to cut a deal with Fitzgerald (it has been reported at Josh Marshall's blog that Fitzgerald paid a visit to Rove's lawyer yesterday...);

3) The rumors are underestimating the number of indictments to be handed down;

4) While most of the indictments will be the result of the conspiracy to cover up the blowing of Plame's cover, some will be related to espionage, others related to conspiracy to use forged documents to push the US into war;

5) Fitzgerald extends the grand jury.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "use forged documents to push the US into war"
Can you point to the related statute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. I'm not an attorney, but I think "Committing fraud against the U.S."
might be a relevant statute. Remember that the war so far has cost $300 billion and mounting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. I'll try to find that charge in the lawbooks
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
58. Don't mean to keep beating a dead horse ... but
"Fraud against the United States" (and conspiracy to commit same) should exist in the statutes. Perhaps an attorney reading this post could comment? (I'm not an attorney)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Ooh, I hope number 3 is right,
that the number of indictments is low! The entire cabal should be taken down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. I heard they offered Rove a deal........
....the article I read said they're going to charge Rove with perjury and obstruction of justice. It said they would drop the obstruction of justice charge if Rove would plead guilty to perjury.

Rove turned it down........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. I sure hope he doesn't make any deals with Rove unless it means Rove is
giving up Bush himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. CIA leak probe has Wash. waiting (No announcements expected today)
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 11:55 AM by Ernesto
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The federal grand jury investigating the leak of a CIA operative's identity could hand up charges as early as today, but Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald is not expected to make any public announcements Wednesday, one source with knowledge of the probe told CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/26/cia.leak/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. ...
:rofl: Where have you been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Oi! Again with the waiting!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Why is Scooter on crutches?
I never saw that before! Is he disbled, or did he get hurt recently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I think he fell off his pedestal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. Nah, he fell over after his feet of clay crumbled...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Dick beat the shit out of him.
Or Dick's goons beat the shit outta him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
57. He "fell" while choking on a pretzel.
These "accidents" are more common than you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadJohnShaft Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Raw story just said he asked for Rove/Libby
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 11:57 AM by MadJohnShaft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. now I have another question
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 01:30 PM by tulsakatz
this article says:

'Those familiar with the case said that Libby did not inform Rove that Plame was covert. As a result, Rove may not be charged with a crime in leaking Plame’s identity, even though he spoke with reporters.'


Rove may not have known Plame was covert but he did know she worked at the CIA. Don't govt employees have an obligation to find out if they are covert before passing that info along to someone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Thursday, then. *sigh*
At least I'll be free then.

Still, :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, this effectively torpedoes the credibility of
about 50 "scoop" websites, all of whom were claiming "special inside knowledge" that the announcement and indictments would occur today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. We'll know things are looking bad if
Cheney is moved to a secure undisclosed location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. msnbc reported that Fitz left the courthouse about an hour ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. That's not what Richard Sale says
An hour ago I was contacted by a U.S. government official close to the Fitzgerald case. This person told me that there WILL be indictments announced later this afternoon, and the Special Prosecutor will hold a press conference tomorrow.

http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/

Check out his blog. Some very good info there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. msnbc saying grand jury went home for the day. and no ones knows
what went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. somewhere I read that the jury makes the decision and then it is filed
in another room of the courthouse which takes a few hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Whether the info is good or not is an empirical question.
The question will resolve itself soon enough, and the judgment proven false or correct.

Now, the claim you pasted *can't* be so easily falsified: It may indeed be the case that somebody told him indictments will be announced later this afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't think there'll be any indictments...
...I think Fitz will fold up shop, finalize his reports and go home. KKKarl and Scooter (a nickname which always reminds me of a dog scraping its butt on the carpet) will get off scot free.

But it is nice to see the bu$hit crime cabal sweating bullets meanwhile.

At least the crooks have had their sheep outfits removed by Fitz enough that people can see them for the wolves they really are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. but it seems that Fritz is going for the big one-as neighbors of Wilson
were still being interviewed by the FBI last night--as to whether or not they knew if Val was a cia agent. this tells me he is going for the break. (although the other charges are also viable in addtion).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Glass half-empty, eh?
Have you no faith?

We already know fairly well that this isn't going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Everything points to at least some indictments.
You're entitled to your opinion, but there is very little evidence to back up your position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. I'm not trying to be argumentative and I hope I'm WRONG!
But there isn't a lot of evidence that he will indict either - just a lot of speculation from the media.

I figure it could go either way. I'd like to say I'm more confident he'd indict but I'm not. That said, I hope he DOES. Just am not counting on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bloomberg: Grand Jury in CIA Leak Probe Plans No Announcements
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 01:12 PM by longship
Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. grand jury hearing evidence in the leak of a CIA agent's identity won't announce any indictments today, a Justice Department official said.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald met today with grand jurors at the federal courthouse in Washington. Fitzgerald made no comment as he and his staff arrived at 9 a.m. for the start of the session, which lasted about three hours.

More at link.
www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=akMskuikfpGM&refer=top_world_news

Apparently Fitzmas is gonna be tomorrow or Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Now Mayor Bloomberg is involved? How does he know about this?
;) Just kidding of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Do yourselves a favor and quit taking this media hype seriously.
It's all bullpucky. ALL of it. "a source with knowledge of the investigation".... "experts say".... "attorneys close to the investigation say"... etc., etc.

The ONLY people remotely involved with the invesigation who are talking to the media are defense attorneys for Rove and Libby. They only spout defense points that they want the media to report as "news". It's nothing but propaganda, rumor, and sordid speculation.

Please do yourselves a favor, people, and quit reading this tripe. If you can't refrain, at least stop taking it seriously.

It's pure B.S.

Spend time with your significant others, your children, your relatives, your spouses, your friends, your work, your hobbies. Take a vacation. Whatever. Just wait until there is some really *hard news* about Fitzgerald *after* Fitzgerald concludes his preliminary work and takes legal action (or not).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
39. No Announcement from Leak Counsel as Deadline Approaches-NYT
WASHINGTON, Oct. 26 — Tensions rose today at the White House as a special prosecutor met with a grand jury but postponed at least until Thursday any public announcement of a decision on indictments over the leak of a C.I.A. operative’s identity.

As the special counsel, Patrick Fitzgerald, neared the end of a nearly two-year investigation, speculation continued to grow that one or two top White House advisers, and perhaps more, might face criminal indictments.

The grand jury’s term will expire on Friday unless Mr. Fitzgerald obtains an extension.

But the two men apparently at the center of the inquiry — Karl Rove, the president’s deputy chief of staff, and I. Lewis Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff - went about business as usual.

So did President Bush, who stuck to a busy schedule, even as he faced the unsettling prospect of losing the advice of Mr. Rove, a man he often has described as “the architect” of his political success.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/26/politics/26cnd-leak.html?hp&ex=1130385600&en=6dbe6025cdb9b9a9&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. My opinion on why Fitz sent men out to interview Wilsons' neighbors
just a day or so ago: I believe that those last minute trips were in response to a question from a grand juror. That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. Interesting and disturbing.
It shows the willingness to indict but it also shows room for doubt.

Tea leaves inside of tea leaves inside of tea leaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. AP: No indictments today
CIA Leak Investigation
Updated: 2:56 PM Oct 26, 2005
Associated Press

The federal grand jury looking into the leak of a CIA operative's identity has adjourned for the day without announcing any indictments.

A Justice Department official says no announcement will be made Wednesday.

The panel met for three hours with Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, who's finishing up a two-year criminal probe. An indictment could accuse one or more administration aides of breaking a law barring the intentional unmasking of an undercover CIA officer.

Attention has centered on President Bush's top political adviser Karl Rove and Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, Scooter Libby.

The prosecutor also has examined other possible crimes: mishandling classified information, perjury and obstruction of justice.

The grand jury's term expires Friday, though it could be secretly extended by a federal judge, at Fitzgerald's request.

http://www.wtvynews4.com/news/headlines/1923542.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ed murrow Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Friday at 5
I still don't think he will announce anything until Friday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobMorr Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Why no announcment today
Maybe he doesn't want to take the White Sox out of the spotlight when they win the World Series tonight!:toast: Being from Chicago, he may be a White Sox fan.:bounce: One more day of waiting will only get the right more nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. that's a good theory, BobMorr
I admit to wanting Fitzmas to come NOW but that won't make it happen. So, with all the unfounded speculation floating about, your theory about him being a White Sox fan is as good as any for tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Maybe they're planning a surprise FBI raid on the Whitehouse?
wishful thinking ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. He's from Brooklyn
He just works in Chicago.

I doubt he's a White Sox fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Isn't there a press conference scheduled for tommorrow afternoon?
What do you suppose that might be about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
49. LAT: Suspense Builds Over Leak Investigation (juror: "See you Friday.")
Suspense Builds Over CIA Leak Investigation
By Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON -- The CIA leak case continued to build today toward a climactic finish as a grand jury investigating possible wrongdoing by top White House figures met behind closed doors for three hours and the special counsel met privately with the chief judge overseeing the case.

Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald made no announcements about whether he had decided to seek indictments, though speculation was rampant that charges were imminent.

Sources close to the case said they doubted that Fitzgerald would seek to extend the term of the jury, which expires Friday, raising the likelihood of a dramatic denouement soon.

Some lawyers close to the case suggested that Fitzgerald may have already secured at least one indictment but was keeping it under seal until he was ready to announce the results of his 22-month investigation.

One grand juror was overheard telling another juror, "See you Friday," suggesting the possibility that the grand jury would continue to meet up to the last minute....


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-102605leak_lat,0,668287.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Could have been a bluff! Who knows at this point? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. or it could be the end of term celebratory luncheon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. What does the following sentence mean, please?
A federal judge would have to approve the sealing of any indictment.


Why would the indictment be sealed? Sealing the evidence from the public that was found?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. Sealing it would only be temporary
The prosecutor would likely want to get all his ducks in a row before making an announcement when he discharge the jury panel,
but it makes sense to hand over an indictment to the judge and ask
for it to be sealed for a fixed amount of time.

Not a big deal.

b_b

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. If Fitzgerald is fired prior to obtaining and sealing indictments, then .
would that lawfully avert those who are targets being indicted?

If Fitzgerald obtains indictments and gets those indictments sealed prior to getting fired, do those indictments remain preserved and viable for arraignment?

May we have clarification here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #49
53. good grief. they could be meeting for lunch or a walk in the park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. or they could be headed to national airport
just kidding

i agree
that quote "see you friday" definitely deserves a good grief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
59. Bummer, it's my birthday, too-I was hoping for a double celebration
Maybe tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
61. Reuters: CIA leak prosecutor prepares for Friday decision
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 06:51 PM by ailsagirl
By Adam Entous
Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:31 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With the fate of at least two top White House advisers hanging in the balance, special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald conferred in secret with his legal team and lawyers before an expected final decision on Friday on charges over the leaking of a covert CIA operative's identity.

Indictments in the case could trigger an immediate shake-up at the White House, already on the defensive over plummeting poll figures, soaring gas prices, opposition to the Iraq war and the withdrawal of President George W. Bush's nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, Harriet Miers.

Fitzgerald has zeroed in on Lewis Libby, chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney, and Karl Rove, Bush's top political adviser, who both conversed with reporters in June and July 2003 about the operative, Valerie Plame. Other current and former administration officials may also be charged.

Attorneys representing some of the potential defendants have been making final appeals to Fitzgerald to try to avoid indictment, raising the prospect of last-minute plea agreements, according to one lawyer involved in the case.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2005-10-27T233102Z_01_KRA572753_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-LEAK.xml&archived=False

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Fitz gave Libby and Rove time to make deals. Anticipation.......


The White House initially denied Libby and Rove had anything to do with the leak, but reporters have singled them out as sources in grand jury testimony.

Fitzgerald could charge administration officials with knowingly revealing Plame's identity, as well as bring charges for easier-to-prove crimes including making false statements, perjury, obstruction of justice or disclosing classified information, lawyers involved in the case said.

Legal sources said Rove could face perjury charges for initially failing to tell the grand jury he talked to Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper about Plame.

Libby was open to false statement and obstruction charges because of contradictions between his testimony and that of Miller and other journalists, the lawyers said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. I have no objection to nailing them on the easy stuff.
After all, they got Capone on tax evasion. They could pin all those murders on him, so they got him with what they could. The result was the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC