|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:01 PM Original message |
Poll: Bush would lose an election if held this year (CNN) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. No shit Sherlock! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandrakae (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. lot of fucking good this does us now.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. It was probably true last November, too. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
39. took the words outta my mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Fuck you CNN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Man, you got that right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. CNN too busy hyping Bush in 'o4 to do any reporting n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nodehopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
75. that is my theme song. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. duh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 09:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
67. CNN? Wasn't this just on the cover of "Duh Magazine"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. Gee...media knew most of this stuff in 2003/4 and chose to NOT TELL people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well "Democratic candidate" doesn't really do anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. While I tend to agree, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. He didn't win last year either. He's never won a POTUS election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Do you think the election elves will talk if Rove goes down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. And they're answerable to corporate masters, not to a candidate or party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. but what about Rove and his tabulators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Rove is a tool (in more ways than one). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. I understand your theory but I don't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #46 |
89. Possibly, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 04:48 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. don't think so, I think this was load and go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:10 AM Response to Reply #37 |
60. That's it exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. What about the paranoia over the new sequoia president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enki23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. it's a lot easier to say that about an unnamed, unsmeared democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bain_sidhe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. Sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yorkiemommie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. there's that base |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. Yep it's the same 30% who hated Clinton so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yorkiemommie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 10:33 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. lol ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
10. So CNN is saying the other two elections were on the square? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
12. Another trifecta for Georgie! That makes 3 in a row he lost!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. On some subjects, it is like we are all of one mind here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barrett808 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. Iraq war a mistake: "dramatic shift downward"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
16. Why? Because he's not in control of the voting machines anymore? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
19. Cr@P Not News. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swimmernsecretsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. Great. Now you tell us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
21. No surprise, because he also lost the election that was held last year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. Uh, he lost it last year... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 07:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. Yes, and he lost it five years ago also... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 02:41 PM Response to Reply #42 |
83. How right you are... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
23. Poorly worded poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
44. You're right, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
second edition (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
63. I think they purposely worded it this way so that Kerry wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
81. Bush has also been losing to an Unnamed Democrat since 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olddad56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
24. I don't think he will be running again, but if he did.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
27. big fucking deal--E voting fraud in key places would turn that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
31. Umm, CNN, pssst! he lost it last year too. Pass it on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Theres-a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. don't forget '00 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
33. What are you prepared to do?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nvliberal (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
34. WTF, CNN? Bush lost 2000 and 2004, and it didn't stop him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
35. Doh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oregonindy (790 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
36. and he lost in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. Rememebr the Ohio Exit Polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
41. Lose an election??? HE SHOULD BE IN JAIL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
primavera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 09:13 AM Response to Reply #41 |
68. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #68 |
84. Yes, yes. Forget about low approval ratings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justyce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
43. How is this going to affect his mandate?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
45. Deleted message |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
49. Poll: Bush would lose an election if held this year (Dems preferred also) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 10:38 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. News flash: He only won one.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 10:38 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Shrub Would Lose An Election If Held Last Year.....Assuming Legit. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
complain jane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
52. Bush "lost" an election in 2000 and 2004, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
53. Come on CNN/ Gallop, say it, the Democrat is John Kerry and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
54. This is a distraction to gloss over the lie. The fix is in folks until we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthpusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
55. Mood is sour on Bush, Congress (55% say - would vote for an unnamed Dem) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vi5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:07 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. You know what? We saw this same "unnamed dem" thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:07 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Means little cause Democrats viewed almost as negtively. Now's the chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
second edition (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:07 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Unnamed Democrat = John Kerry! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oioioi (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:07 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Probably the same 55% who voted for him in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
second edition (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:28 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Good point! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
62. Weren't they saying the same thing last year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
second edition (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 08:42 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Nope, I don't recall a poll of this nature asking such a generic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 09:08 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. They were exit polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antonialee839 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
65. Not surprising considering * lost the last two also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
69. So let's have Election this year! Or at least a REAL recount of '04 vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:59 AM Response to Reply #69 |
76. RICO, then recall n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
70. He absolutely would "win" ... the way he "won" 2000 and 2004 ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
71. time for another war (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMillie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
72. CNN: Poll says Bush would lose an election held this year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:42 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. No suprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 10:42 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Technically - He lost last year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. Yup...this makes Douche Boosh 0 for 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twaddler01 (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puglover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
77. Oh just dandy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
78. Pity Il Douche's done with elections, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
79. Unfortunately invalid, since the preznit elections aren't by popular vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
80. wow, this is a stupid poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
schmuls (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
85. No shit! He lost last time too. But he moved into the White House anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
against all enemies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
86. Really? What states would turn from red to blue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 04:14 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. You have isolated the most important question. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
88. CNN and kerry are the last ones to figure stuff out.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twaddler01 (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
91. he lost before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndElectoral (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 05:29 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. exactly...and everyone knows it, and we can't even get it fully investigat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
94. okay, let's hold an election this year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC