Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Letter Shows Authority to Expand CIA Leak Probe Was Given in '04

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 10:14 PM
Original message
WP: Letter Shows Authority to Expand CIA Leak Probe Was Given in '04
Edited on Sat Oct-22-05 10:17 PM by Pirate Smile
Letter Shows Authority to Expand CIA Leak Probe Was Given in '04

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 23, 2005; Page A05

Weeks after he took over the investigation 22 months ago into the unauthorized disclosure of a CIA operative's identity, special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald got authority from the Justice Department to expand his inquiry to include any criminal attempts to interfere with his probe, according to a letter posted Friday on Fitzgerald's new Web site.

Fitzgerald is nearing a decision on whether he will prosecute anyone when the federal grand jury term ends Friday. The letter specified that he could investigate and prosecute "perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence and intimidation of witnesses."

-snip-
In a letter dated Feb. 6, 2004, then-Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey said that he was clarifying, "at your request," the added authority to investigate and prosecute "crimes committed with intent to interfere with your investigation." Fitzgerald's appointment as special counsel on Dec. 30, 2003, after then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft recused himself, gave him specific authority to investigate "the alleged unauthorized disclosure of a CIA employee's identity," according to another letter from Comey posted on the Web site.

"The fact that he asked for authority that he probably already had, but wanted spelled out, makes it arguable that he had run into something rather quickly," Washington lawyer Plato Cacheris said yesterday.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/22/AR2005102201113.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. wasn't Plato Cacheris the lawyer...
...for someone in the Lewinsky mess? Perhaps Ms. Lewinsky's lawyer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes he was. I remember reading his biography around that time.
She had someone else too but I can't remember his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep - Monica Lewinsky and...
a bunch of traitors - Attorney General John Mitchell (Watergate), Fawn Hall (Iran-Contra - worked for Ollie North), Aldrich Ames (turncoat CIA /Russian spy), and Robert Hanssen (FBI agent/Russian spy) are among his "clients."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I think I read that he's representing Franklin (AIPAC spy case) too. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. More cowbell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. This was on Fritz's website Friday
Old news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Patrick Fitzgerald, you are no Kenneth Starr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Maybe Fitz doesn't wanna...
work at Pepperdine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Thank God for That!
One Kenneth Starr is too many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. IMO-This article is notifying whomever it was
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 01:26 AM by hang a left
that destroyed evidence and threatened witnesses that he is knows about it. I disagree with the poster below who announced that this is "old news" because this letter appeared on Fitzgerald's website on Friday. I read the letter and it did not occur to me that he had asked for a clarification after starting his investigation because it was a possibility he had come up with something rather quickly.

The suspense is almost killing me, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
10.  kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fitzmas eve meets Groundhog Day... the suspense, the suspense....
Fitzmas Day can't get here soon enough!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. what does Cacheris mean?
"The fact that he asked for authority that he probably already had, but wanted spelled out, makes it arguable that he had run into something rather quickly,"

Please decode for me. Does he mean it can be argued that Fitz ran into early in the game? Or by "arguable" does he mean the opposite, debatable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I read it as: "You gave me this job, I discovered a DOOZY of a crime
right off the bat, and I just want to make sure that you don't pull the rug out from under me before I take your asses down."

:P

Yes, "arguable" in this case probably means "debatable" or perhaps even "likely."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That is nicely phrased, and is exactly the sense I take from the comment.
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 09:54 AM by Jackpine Radical
It sounds like classic Fitz to make sure that he has all his ducks in a row, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes...

... Fitzgerald is crossing his "t's" and dotting his "i's", he didn't want this thrown out on a technicality at some point in the future. I guess you could call it a "procedural" move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wow. Just Wow.
Join me on the chorus, now:

"It's beginning to look a lot like Fitzmas

Everywhere you go!

There's a lawyer on every cell, and in each office as well,

the sturdy kind that doesn't mind the dough!

It's beginning to look a lot like Fitzmas! Soon the bells will start.

And the thing that will make them ring are indictments that you bring

Into the BushCo heart!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Excellent!
More kick and snare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC