Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Rejects EPA Air Pollution Revision (as: "flip-flop", "switcheroo")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 07:40 PM
Original message
Court Rejects EPA Air Pollution Revision (as: "flip-flop", "switcheroo")
WASHINGTON -- A federal appeals court Friday rejected what it called a Bush administration attempt to "pull a surprise switcheroo" by weakening the government's authority to monitor air pollution from power plants, refineries and factories.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia annulled the Environmental Protection Agency's revisions of air pollution monitoring requirements last year. The court's action returns for the time-being a stricter, Clinton-era standard that allows EPA and states to require more monitoring from plants when they renew their operating permits every five years.

Writing for a three-judge panel, Judge David Sentelle said an EPA settlement last year with the utility and other industry groups on monitoring requirements contradicted the agency's 2002 interpretation of the Clean Air Act.

"The upshot of EPA's final interpretation ... is that state permitting authorities are now prohibited from adding new monitoring requirements," wrote Sentelle, who was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan. "This flip-flop complies with the (law) only if preceded by adequate notice and opportunity for public comment."

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-epa-air-pollution,0,4974369.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Durn Them Thar Acteevist Judgez! (Sarcasm) NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. that's really funny!
he actually used the word switcheroo. :-)

Sentelle said the court can't allow EPA to justify limited public input by claiming its final regulations merely were a "logical outgrowth" of an earlier rulemaking process.

"Thus, we have refused to allow agencies to use the rulemaking process to pull a surprise switcheroo on regulated entities," he wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. SENTELLE????
First he agrees with putting Judy in jail, now THIS??? Color me confused.

Gonna pay much more attention to body-switching sci-fi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. whow--I am so glad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. and this guy is scolding Bush?WH.

.....Eric Schaeffer, a former EPA civil enforcement chief who heads the Environmental Integrity Project, said the Bush administration had "abandoned the authority" that federal and state agencies had to require improved monitoring to find pollution that often escapes detection.

He said the court's restores citizens' right to demand constant monitoring of pollution from local power plants, refineries and factories "that allows you to know whether they're complying with the law."

"If you can't tell whether someone's violating the Clean Air Act, then what good is the law?" Schaeffer said. "It's as if you put a cop on the road every 5 years to see if people are speeding -- it's that big of a problem."

Representatives for industry groups with knowledge of last year's settlement with EPA couldn't be reached immediately for comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks
I needed some good news for a change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC