Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP BREAKING: No Indictment - Rove to give more testimony in Plame case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:21 PM
Original message
AP BREAKING: No Indictment - Rove to give more testimony in Plame case
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:24 PM by VolcanoJen
It's not over... now breaking on CNN.

Looking for link...

LINK:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20051006/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cia_leak_rove_1

Rove Said to Testify in CIA Leak Case

WASHINGTON - Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th-hour testimony in the case of a CIA officer's leaked identity but have warned they cannot guarantee he won't be indicted, according to people directly familiar with the investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The persons, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, said Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has not made any decision yet on whether to file criminal charges against the longtime confidant of President Bush or others.

The U.S. attorney's manual requires prosecutors not to bring witnesses before a grand jury if there is a possibility of future criminal charges unless they are notified in advance that their grand jury testimony can be used against them in a later indictment.

Rove has already made at least three grand jury appearances and his return at this late stage in the investigation is unusual.

The prosecutor did not give Rove similar warnings before his earlier grand jury appearances.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thedailyshow Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. interesting!
Is he flipping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He will testify with no gurarantee of immunity.
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM by evlbstrd
No word on what he's going to say, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's as Lawrence O'Donnell suggested... the target letters were bait.
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM by VolcanoJen
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-odonnell/plamegate-the-next-step_b_8447.html

Excerpt:

Fitzgerald does not have to send Rove or anyone else a target letter before indicting him. The only reason to send target letters now is that Fitzgerald believes one or more of his targets will flip and become a prosecution witness at the pre-indictment stage. A veteran prosecutor told me, "If Fitzgerald is sending target letters at the end of his investigation, those are just invitations to come in and work out a deal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
39. Current Faux spin
"Karl offered to testify again in July but the prosecuter just accepted his offer."
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
64. fauxsux lies again..they are beyond
spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #64
181. Vegas odds have Rove being indicted at 8 to 1 chances
seems smart money knows somthing we don't!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
75. Ha!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
66. Being invited for a return engagement with no immunity
Is very bad news for the prospective grillee. It may be that they want to use him to get someone else, or to rule something else out. I think there's gonna be a lot of flopsweat around the West Wing for the next week or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
68. Boy, that Fitzgerald is one canny, canny dude.
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
133. I read an article yesterday
that said his nickname is 'The Bulldog'. Go Get 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Gonna squeal like a pig - maybe
If they have a real case against him - he'll roll over and show his belly. He didn't get where he was by being loyal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Karl's too pretty to go to prison!
Hee, hee. No message. That was just fun to type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Turd blossom will end up getting it
up his turd blossom :-) I'm pretty sure he'll avoid that at all costs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
134. We Want a Karl Rove Frog-March!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
81. Why do I keep hearing the theme song from Deliverance
running in my head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothometoday Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #81
91. Great...now
thats stuck in my head for the night!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #91
128. ssssqqqqqeeeeeelll sssqqqeeeellllll
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 05:09 PM by Lochloosa


Hey, I might make that my new Avatar....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankybubba Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #128
154. comparing rove
to degenerates is an insult to degenerates everywhere(;))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #128
178. You know, there is a resemblance...




Just put glasses on Ned and you've got Karl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #178
182. But Ned would have been such a good Karl....he would have brought
out the little child in him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
179. "If they have a real case against him, he'll roll over and show his belly"
Maybe we'll see that he indeed has ten or more nipples...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i miss america Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Apparently so. If prosecutors accepted Rove's offer, than it sure seems
as though they may be giving him a chance to set the record straight and correct any previous inaccurate (or perjured) testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
104. That is it--one more chance Karl"we know what you said/did"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
129. Reminds me of Condi's 9/11 Commission do-over.
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 05:13 PM by sadiesworld
:puke:

edit because 2 m's are better than 1 in the word commission
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
137. You cannot correct perjured testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i miss america Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #137
142. True, but it might earn turdblossom a few brownie points
with a lenient judge. Then again, he just might enjoy being locked up with a 6'8" horny cell mate.

Poor kkkarl. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ahh...the bargaining begins!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. The letter must have mentioned perjury and now KKKarl wants a chance...
"to set the record straight"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Clearly, it's a simple case of...
...Rove having misspoken at some point. It happens to powerful Republicans all the time. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Rove's lawyer claims Rove hasn't received target letter. So far. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. no, Rove's lawyer when last asked about the target letter said
'no comment' which means yes, he did receive one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Luskin today says no target letter received. From AP article:
"I can say categorically that Karl has not received a target letter from the special counsel. The special counsel has confirmed that he has not made any charging decisions in respect to Karl," Luskin said.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-wh/2005/oct/06/100607642.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Oh, didn't see that, thanks for the update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
144. The explicitly stated lack of guarantee against prosecution is big though
That is basically a so called "target letter" in-and-of itself, as far as I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. But it could be a phone call! It doesn't need to be a letter.
And once again we have the chance to tell the truth but lie about the seriousness of the situation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. Not exactly a target, but...
"Before accepting the offer, Fitzgerald sent correspondence to Rove's legal team making clear that there was no guarantee he wouldn't be indicted at a later point as required by the rules."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/06/cialeak.rove.ap/index.html

Translation: Not exactly a "target", but not out of the field of fire either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #43
90. Fitz reportedly sent a letter to Rove saying no quarantee that no
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 03:31 PM by Garbo 2004
indictment might result. Letting Karl know he's not off the hook as a potential target.

I think fed procedure/policy requires target notification in writing when the person is to testify, either voluntarily or as a result of a subpoena.

And while Luskin said that a target letter must be issued prior to an indictment, it's usual procedure but apparently the gov't is not legally required to notify a target before an indictment is issued. The gov't may choose not to issue a target letter prior to an indictment if doing so might jeopardize the investigation for example, if there is concern regarding flight, destruction of evidence, harm to witnesses. http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/11mcrm.htm#9-11.153
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rove to give new testimony to Grand Jury
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM by SW FL Dem
Breaking CNN NO link yet. CNN says testimony is voluntary but may not prevent charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The best part
Prosecutors cannot guarantee that he will not be indicted later - MSNBC.
:headbang: :yourock: :rofl: :rofl: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He's in it up to his eyeballs! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
116. Do we have any snack food here other than popcorn?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #116
127. Yeh, those little round tortilla chips...
...with the orange plastic goop on them. Nachos (rhymes with 'catch-os') or something like that.

And weinies that have been rolling back and forth on one of those oil-coated griller thingies for 24 hours or so until they're kind of wrinkly and hard-looking.

Me, I'll stick with :popcorn:

munchily,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. AP story: Rove Said to Testify in CIA Leak Case
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM by Garbo 2004
Rove Said to Testify in CIA Leak Case
By JOHN SOLOMON
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th hour testimony in the case of a CIA officer's leaked identity but have warned they cannot guarantee he won't be indicted, according to people directly familiar with the investigation.

The persons, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, said Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has not made any decision yet on whether to file criminal charges against the longtime confidant of President Bush or others.

The U.S. attorney's manual requires prosecutors not to bring witnesses before a grand jury if there is a possibility of future criminal charges unless they are notified in advance that their grand jury testimony can be used against them in a later indictment.

Rove has already made at least three grand jury appearances and his return at this late stage in the investigation is unusual.
Full at link: http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-wh/2005/oct/06/100607642.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. AP: Karl Rove to give more testimony to Grand Jury. Prosecutors
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM by Pirate Smile
can't guarantee that he won't be charged. This will be Roves 4th time before the GJ. Similar warnings were not given the past three times Rove testified. Prosecutors must give witnesses the warning (i.e. that they can't guarantee that he won't be charged) if it applies before they have them testify.

This was CNN reporting what AP is reporting.

Did Rove flip????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Trolling for Truth, No Doubt
It's like "what's My Line?" or "To Tell the Truth".

How many guesses does the panel get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. "Did Rove flip????"
I highly doubt it. More chance that they decided somebody else will get the blame than Rove (or any of them) flipping. The whole houe would come down then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. I think Rove is trying to establish the basis of a deal.
Bush has already been distancing himself from Rove.

Rove's importance to Bush obviously includes the possibility that Rove might be able to keep the flames from reaching higher.
That would maybe mean ratting out someone in the WHIG.

Personally, I think Rove isn't a Neocon, rather he's a republican supremicist like DeLay. IMO he'll sacrifice all or part of Cheney's crew to keep himself and the presidency from being torched.

We already know that Libby looks like toast. So if Rove is going to provide something it probably isn't going to be about Libby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. How is Chimpy distancing himself from Rove?
because Rove was absent from Miers' nomination announcement/ Anything else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
83. Frontpage on DU yesterday...Rove has been generally absent
from public occasions. I doubt it's his work on Katrina recovery that is keeping him away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #49
174. Would it really surprise you...
...if they all got together and decided that someone needed to take the fall, and that someone was Libby? He's expendable. Rove isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I wonder if bush's brain is pissed off at cheney yet ?
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM by proud patriot
I want a battle of the arrogant .

Cheney runs it ?
No
Rove Runs it?

no no no

it's the chimperor?

:rofl:

Gannon to the rescue

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
132. I've pondered this...
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 05:19 PM by Mr_Jefferson_24
...possibility as well. When push comes to shove, they will start turning on each other. We saw it in the late stages of Watergate. Nixon's staff initially closed ranks and served up a sacrificial lamb or two, but the prosecutor (I think Nixon fired him or at least tried to) wasn't satisfied. That's when they collapsed like a house of cards. This criminal cartel is so guilty of so many crimes, so much worse than Plamegate---maybe this is just wishful thinking, but it seems to me they've got to come crashing down, and soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #132
164. Sounds "Very" Reasonable.
Good pondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #132
166. The original prosecutor, Archibald Cox, was fired by Nixon
and was replaced by Leon Jaworski
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #166
167. You're right. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Ap Story quote
WASHINGTON (AP) _ Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th hour testimony in the case of a CIA officer’s leaked identity but have warned they cannot guarantee he won’t be indicted, according to people directly familiar with the investigation.

The persons, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, said Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has not made any decision yet on whether to file criminal charges against the longtime confidant of President Bush or others.

The U.S. attorney’s manual requires prosecutors not to bring witnesses before a grand jury if there is a possibility of future criminal charges unless they are notified in advance that their grand jury testimony can be used against them in a later indictment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Rove Vs. Cheney
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Bingo
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
44. Bingo Bongo Bango.
Both have been notably absent from public view of late. No wonder the chimperor looks worried--if Kkkarl AND Unka Dick go to jail, who's going to tuck him in at night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #44
109. Jack...
...Daniels.
:evilgrin:
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepper32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #109
148. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
51. badda bing, badda boom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. EXCELLENT!
Rove vs. Cheney, and Rove is a rat anyway so it's no surprise he'd turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
172. Sounds like Thunderdome to me...
"Two men enter. One man leaves."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. So is this his last chance to "revise" his past testimony an
avoid prison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. That's my guess too...
"I didn't lie. Let me testify again and I'll tell you what I meant"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
121. Which would be another lie!....LIES...LIES...LIES.
That all he knows. He went to the Universty of LIES. Majored in Lies. And got a Ph.D is Lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Possibly. But it will come at some expense, I'd wager.
He'll probably have to give some more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Could he turn on the Chimperor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
55. Why not? He's a loathesome guy. Rove probably hates him as much as we do
Imagine spending every day with the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #55
125. The sad part is that everyone knows that Bush is so dumb...
that they would never blame him or even point a finger saying that he would be smart enough to out a CIA agent. So the buck stops at KKKarl Rove, his "BRAIN"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #125
169. Though Miers reportedly said he's the smartest guy she's ever known. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Turdblossoms of Autumn
blooming before our eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. ...in clusters!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:29 PM
Original message
This case is just going to continue
"but have warned they cannot guarantee he won't be indicted"
Fitzgerald is just postponing the indictments to get Rove's testimony. Maybe Libby will take the fall and Rove will get off scott free, as Lawrence O'Donnel hinted could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. WTF?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. This worries me only because Fitzgerald might have to extend the Grand
Jury now. Rove knows that and is perhaps testifying to stall things a bit, maybe they've got a plan in the works to derail Fitzgerald if they can hold off the indictments long enough. They just offered Fitzgerald's boss some cushy job in the private sector and have replace him with someone very suspicious. Can't remember the details. Anybody know about this, who it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. They want this over ASAP
Extending the GJ would bring its resolution that much closer to the '06 elections. This whole deal smells fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. I don't think it's fishy on Fitzgerald's part, just on Roves. The longer
this drags out the longer the Bush crime family has an opportunity to distract from or derail the investigation altogether. They will do anything, they are desperate, this includes engineering an massive attack against our troops or another attack against American citizens. Then, all bets are off, Fitzgerald and his investigation become immediately irrelevant because of a National Security priority. He's got to bring indictments soon.

Besides, I can't stand the wait anymore, it's killing me, I can't think of anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
74. Oh, me too. I'm a big fan of Fitz and I want him to take the time
and do the job right... but JEEZ!!!!! Let's INDICT ALREADY!!!

The amazing thing about this is that only us political junkies are following this thing with bated breath. I talked to a somewhat well-informed friend of mine and she had only the vaguest idea of what was going on. Fitz just hasn't been saying much.

The indictments will burst across the American news scene with a loud BOOM of surprise. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:38 PM
Original message
stalling to get Miers approved for Supreme Court?
what better way for Bush than to stack the court with his friends - Roberts, and now Miers...his personal lawyer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. I wonder what will weigh on the "brain" more heavily
a long prison sentence with no chance of pardon (as *Co will no longer be able to hold onto his office)

or

a suicide death by the hands of the BFEE?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. This is the beginning of the end
of Plamegate, I'm afraid.

Nothing is going to come of this, just as I figured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kostya Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
65. Someone may take a symbolic fall, but in general I agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
95. I feel the same way.
Probably no one will be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
145. I wouldn't give up hope yet
I mean yeah, all the things that have come up against this administration only to fade away into the night. The Downing Street Memo comes straight to mind. If that wasn't a smoking gun, what would be?

But on the other hand, Rove has not testified in front of this grand jury at least four times. That indicates something big is in the works. His lawyers would not allow him to keep testifying if they felt he didn't absolutely have to do so (to avoid prosecution, most likely). Every time he gets up there he just builds more and more of a perjury case against himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. I wonder how many times will this will be (Lies) for Rove? Lets see if he
he lied to Grand Jury other times and lie again... They'll hang his ass big time! Rove must be running scare because he knows he'd fucking lied to Grand Jury!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
143. So did Bu$h and Cheney, perjure I mean
There is no way these guys where not the ones pulling the strings on the outing. They had to be the ones at ground zero because they were under pressure at that time to come-up with WMD in Iraq.

The David Kelly murder, outing Plame, outing the cover company she worked for, all this had to happen to place WMD in Iraq.

Even though the placement of the WMD was never pulled-off, to do that these guys needed the watchers out of the way.

Don't think Bu$h is stupid, he's as smart as the rest of them. It is all an act, him acting stupid, he's as shrewed as they come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. Can you say perjury?
After visiting the grand jury three times and now going for a fourth, how is this lying piece of turd blossom, going to keep his story straight? He's done for.

Not to mention he'll be tattling on Libby and Cheney so fast it'll make the grand jury heads spin.

My only disappointment is that Bush may come out of this unscathed. I hope I'm wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
168. Rove is expendable to the BFEE. But, so is *.
Rove is in over his head, but with bigger people behind him.

He needs to protect *.
* is expendable to his mom and dad.
Bush Sr. is expendable to his users.
The users are the military(&Congressional/Global) industrial complex.

A problem is that the prosecutor only follows the big picture with *, Cheney and Rove, not the bigger picture of the BFEE and beyond.

But, there could be enough witnesses that would haul in * and Rove and Cheney and they are all somebody's expendable. So, it is still possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
38. Good, Another chance for Turd Blossom to perjure himself.--n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. That's what I'm concerned about
If he lied before and comes clean now, can he be tried for perjury for his prior grand jury testimony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
69. He's been told that it does not mean he won't be indicted.
My thinking is that while he's going to do some fancy footwork, he'll still be kicking shit.

I think he's in trouble and he's been told to take one for the team, he's covered, come what may.

He may just be attempting to re-arrange reality a bit to protect, oh I dunno, Cheney?

I think he's going down, there will just be some damage control attempted on Rove's part to protect "big timers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
76. Definitely!
I'm no lawyer, so take this with a grain of salt, but once you lie under oath it continues to be a lie. However, Fitzgerald has power to DECIDE to charge him with this. Also, the grand jury has some control over this as well.

I don't think there are any "do overs". Yet, if Rove gives really juicy info and is remorseful, maybe they'll decide not to charge him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
138. Yes, he can still be tried for previous perjury. "Sorry" doesn't work here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
42. Bob Kur on msnbc ...... 3.35 pm edt ......
This will be Rove's fourth trip to the grand jury. He also said that Rove has not said he received a target letter. But then he reiterated the notion that his testimony would not give him any immunity from prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
46. now on CNN.com
Rove to give additional testimony in leak inquiry
Prosecutors won't guarantee that Bush advisor won't be indicted

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/06/cialeak.rove.ap/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
47. Do we know when he will testify? Tomorrow morning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. now on MSNBC
Without protection, Rove to testify on CIA leak
Prosecutors say there's no guarantee president's adviser won't be indicted


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9613084/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
50. The only reasons to volunteer to appear before a grand jury
for a fourth time are because you are very, very worried about something you have already said or you are ready to throw someone else under the bus or both.It would be extremely difficult to correct your testimony of at least three prior occasions so my bet is that he will try and pin Libby with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. I agree with everything you said except that I think Rove will pin it all
on someone at a lower level than Libby. I would bet that Libby and Rove have discussed who would take the fall in this case if necessary and it would not surprise me if they actually have a volunteer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #56
79. I think it is way past that point. Prosecutors tend to work their
way up the food chain not down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #79
102. yes and Libby has is already up to his beady little eyes in this shit
I think rove will roll over and put the blame on libby with the hope he can come out with no indictment himself. Can you say Halderman and Erlichman? I knew you could!

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
52. "accepted an offer to testify". Must be pretty fucking nice...
.. can any of us imagine playing those games with a Grand Jury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
53. But can we believe Turdblossom's testimony?
I can picture Fitzgerald kicked back, eating popcorn during the questioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i miss america Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #53
88. And likewise, I can picture myself kicked back and eating popcorn during
... the impeachment hearings

:popcorn: :party: :bounce: :toast:

Bring it on!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #88
161. Shh! Can you hear the yukking up going on btw Fitz & his team right now?
Perhaps they've even got a pool going, anticipating who will get fingered, which lies he'll come up with...

I think we're going to get a great birthday present this year:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i miss america Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #161
175. LOL, I think the yukking you hear is coming from me but
hopefully Fitz will bah bah bah ba da bob bob bob bahda dring ding ding ding da da bahbah brrrrrrrriiinnnnnnnnngggggggg us some good news very soon.

And my word! Crazy Frog kkkarl has such a cute little dinger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #175
183. He should consider putting a chastity belt on that dinger soon...
They're waitin' for ya, Turdblossom!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i miss america Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #183
184. Yup. Hopefully kkkarl will soon learn that life's a bitch. And so is he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
57. Rove vs Cheney? Whom to root for? head exploding - need imput!
Locusts or boils?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #57
80. I'm rooting for dual annihilation from this bandstand.
:popcorn: ...they both seem like 'fight-to-the-death'ers to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
59. He reminds me of a desperate little kid.
Pulling out lame excuses to give himself more time to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bspence Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
60. Without protection, Rove to testify on CIA leak
From MSNBC:

Without protection, Rove to testify on CIA leak
Prosecutors say there's no guarantee president's adviser won't be indicted

WASHINGTON - Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th hour testimony in the case of a CIA officer’s leaked identity but have warned they cannot guarantee he won’t be indicted, according to people directly familiar with the investigation.

The persons, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, said Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has not made any decision yet on whether to file criminal charges against the longtime confidant of President George W. Bush or others.

The U.S. attorney’s manual requires prosecutors not to bring witnesses before a grand jury if there is a possibility of future criminal charges unless they are notified in advance that their grand jury testimony can be used against them in a later indictment.

link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. No immunity?
Looks like some congressional committee had better gear up to get all these folks in to testify and gum up the prosecutor's job by granting immunity left and right like they did for Oliver North, so that another generation of crooked Republican swine can break the law with impunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. If someone is just jerking us around they are succeeding. This is juicy
gossip. Does anyone know anything about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #62
70. It's not gossip. It's fact.
This is Rove's FOURTH trip to the grand jury!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #60
120. "prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove"
Did they really say that? Are they saying Rove is the one who "offered" to testify, and that Fitz ACCEPTED his offer?

Hmm. Can't be correct, methinks....but things are so strange under this misadministration, nothing would surprise me much anymore.

I'm wondering if Libby already outed Rove and boosh. Cheney won't easily give up his power, and Libby is Cheney's man.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bergamot Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
67. Let's hope Fitzgerald is fair and balanced
and asks Rove about his sex life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #67
73. Ah yes!, that love triangle: Rove-Gannon-Bush.
The menage-a-blah. Blah, blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #67
86. Lets hope Fitz will have his cake (more testimony) and eat it too (indict)
Then an all-out brawl between Cheney and Rove would be fun too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
71. Cheneys crew decide to "turn" on Karl (hence the love letter to Miller)
Karl in order to hopefully save himself is taking a major chance by giving testimony unprotected because he ha sno choice.. his only hope now is to give info on bigger fish and that means Cheney not Scooter or any of the others. The only fish that are bigger than Rove is Cheney and little boots and Rove scumbag though he is will not turn on the drunk lord.

Cheney however might go ahead and turn on him, though...

Does this sound about right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. Obviously, the love letter about the aspens turning
in clusters did not work. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #77
99. ya think...
actually Im not sure about that. I think that was the message, they were all going to turn on Karl in order to protect Dick. Thats why he released her because they think they have a deal with Fitz to get away with it on their side (for the most part) if they hand him Karl.

My thinking is that they didnt think Karl would go straight up with Fitz just to get his ducks off against Cheney... who will probably spill a bit about the smirkster.

I think chimpy is alone on a raft in deep sea of his own spooge and vomit thats what I think.

Karl gets to maintain his "at least I was loyal fucker" thing after he gets out of his shortened sentence for turning on Cheney, Cheney in the meantime gets to try and place blame everywhere but on himself not sure how well that will work because there is only one bigger fish to fry after himself and Im sure Rove kept the resident insulated pretty well excepting himself of course.

Bear in mind Im just trying to still think up the bestest yum yum scenarios for the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #99
106. Yes, there were messages in that letter,
as well as veiled threats. The parts about her being able to write again, etc., were given with the expectation that she would behave in a certain way, I'm sure.

One of the most intriguing parts of all of this is the part about the government and the media. I hope it gets blown wide open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #106
110. You, me and just about the whole world, Janx!
Very wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide open!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #71
78. self deted.
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 03:17 PM by cyberpj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #71
84. Like I said, dual annihilation sound pretty good to me...
:popcorn: because both of them seem like the type to fight to the death ifyou ask me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #84
93. Thats my impression as well.
Either way chimpy is royally screwed because everyone knows (and i mean his cultists as well) are is going to know that his asshole is a perfect fit for Karl and or Cheney. Only way anyone is going to snuggle up to his presidency is because they feel sorry for the mentally deficient amongst us and that would have to include blinky the wonder chimp.

He was not a president in any way at any time, he was only marionette and that my friend is his best defense. What an asinine wimp as well does not know how to control anyone on his staff except through temper tantrums. I hope they make sure he has a bauble or two in his play penitentiary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. hmmm... I don't see them getting The Chimperor. I feel pretty sure
it was one of those "don't tell me anything but handle it" things.

Or perhaps even "let's not tell him about this" from below.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #96
108. I agree they aren't going to get him on this....
Not for jail time anyways...

there are still so many scandals in the wings, DSM isn't over yet and Abu Ghraib will be leaked if not court ordered. Those are two of my faves that I hope destroy him but I dont think they will either, I think its going to be money... some sorta money thingy pointing back to bush himself.

Who knows maybe someone got pics of him with gucky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #108
151. As soon as those around him sink...
Bush will be fucked. He'll go down somehow. Probably some sort of pre-arranged thing that is actually quite minor, but the fact is that without his cabal he is a sitting duck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #71
147. Seems quite possible
You have to think Rove wouldn't go back in front of the grand jury unless he was very concerned about charges being brought against himself. What would his options be at this point? Some say to "clear up prior testimony," but if he has already perjured himself (which I am nearly certain of), then he can't "undo" that. So the only other logical course of action for him is to give up somebody bigger. That leaves only Bush and Cheney, and I agree that he would not give up Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
72. OOOOh, the smell of a deal during the Friday News Dump... tomorrow...
I hate this.

Can his ass, pleeeeeeeeze!

Zeus cannot be so cruel as to take away our election victories in 2000 2004 without throwing us a bone!

Bone = Rove..... (I'd want more, like Cheney on a platter) but... surely, Rove!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalibuChloe Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
82. no indictment or no immunity??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #82
85. No indictment...YET...the whole point of warning letters is to push
the recipients into trying to make a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
87. If they are sending the Rove-r right over... today,
to testify this afternoon, will we hear something today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothometoday Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
89. I doubt this is true
It stinks to high heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #89
100. But then again...
"Everything happens on Friday."

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SittingBull Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
92. Sorry
but it looks like an endless tactical mess with no end in sight.

If we have enough material to be sure that they all need to get indicted, and we could find it easy on the net like this http://www.thinkprogress.org/leak-scandal
why can't Fitzgerald prosecute with this material as base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #92
101. Fitzgerald showed his evidence to the Court of Appeals and convinced
Judge Tatel that crimes were committed. Fitzgerald probably is accepting Rove's offer to testify one more time just to give Rove one last chance to tell the truth or to avoid giving the White House the opportunity after indictments are issued to criticize him for turning Rove's offer down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not fooled Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #92
117. Yep, Fitzgerald may be...
...basically a tough, honest guy (well, as much as a 'puke CAN be), but we are talking about toppling the BFEE here. No way they will let one guy with integrity muck things up. Lots of questioning and behind-the-scenes groveling but nothing more is my prediction.

Which means, no way will kkk and other admin higher-ups be indicted (but I really, really hope I'm wrong).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
94. Rove will sing.
Then he'll be pardoned by *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
97. FREEPERS are trying to get their heads around this one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #97
111. It's a rough day for them
=)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
98. I smell a delay tactic
An earlier post had info that the prosecutor could extend the inquiry if anyone comes forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #98
114. Yep......Delayed by the master.....ROVE!!!!
Fitzgerald must be off his rocker!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:42 PM
Original message
I've a bad feeling about all of this.
People on this board are not going to be happy with the outcome. I've a feeling the dirty rotten bastards are going to get off once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
118. Me too, Obi Wan...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
119. I feel the same
Rove is too smart to simply offer unprotected grand jury testimony without knowing something we don't. He's got something in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #119
139. That's my thought.
The slippery bastard has been before them three times already, and now he is willing to go before the GJ again? No dice. The game is rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
173. Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
These fuckers have never had to answer for any of their mistakes, fuckups, or crimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSchewe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
103. This sounds like Rove may not be getting indicted, but....
if all of this invetigating has been done and he has not indicted someone like Rove, maybe they are going after someone like Dick Cheney.

That is just my loose speculation.

This is my simple math:

The U.S. attorney's manual requires prosecutors not to bring witnesses before a grand jury if there is a possibility of future criminal charges unless they are notified in advance that their grand jury testimony can be used against them in a later indictment.


+

The prosecutor did not give Rove similar warnings before his earlier grand jury appearances.


=

sounds like he can't be indicted...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #103
162. The important thing is that Fitzgerald included the warning for
Rove's appearance tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
105. Hot Damn.....I need to start investing my money in popcorn stocks!
Which shall if be? Orville Redenbacher, Healthy Choice, Pop-Secret, ActI, II and III (Not sure how many Roman numerals they have now), Lean Cuisine, or Weight Watches. Hell...I'll just invest in all of them. At this point it doesn't matter whether you are on a diet or not, whether you like butter, extra butter, light butter or no butter, Caramel, kettle corn, cheddar cheese, nuts or no nuts.

EVERYONE IS GOING TO BE EATING POPCORN WHILE WAITING TO SEE WHAT THE OUTCOME OF KKKARL ROVE WILL BE. SO EAT UP EVERYONE. :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: .:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: AND DON'T FORGET YOU WILL NEED SOMETHING TO WASH IT DOWN. :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
107. I think presidential pardons are in the works
This is getting pretty high, just like Iran-Contra did with Reagan. They criminals will mostly get off, but it will probably mean no Republican presidential candidate can be elected in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
112. How can someone that commits treason be trusted with giving honest
truthful statements or testimony? Seems to me, why bargain with the devil, aka: Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #112
113. Fitz is probably well aware of that.
Maybe this fourth Turd Blossom "visit" is for Fitz' amusement, or maybe he wants Rove to sing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #112
115. LMBAO...You know I never thought about it that way...
But now that you have enlightened me. I must say that you are absolutely "RIGHT". Indict, Convict and Imprison the motherfucker.:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
122. Interesting a 4th appearance w/o immunity...............
Perhaps old Fitz...has a trick up his sleeve. This is unusual but not to unexpected. Perhaps he is giving Rove one final time to come clean or he intends to use him to rebut the testimony of another. I expect that all the gloves will be off in this round. He is definitely going to be sweating old Turd Blossom for all the stink. Perhaps there is a perjury problem.....or something with hearsay or third party testimony. Fitz still isn't offering him a free pass. A witness is always subject to recall but this seems different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #122
124. He's a witness with a charter. The legal options
are huge: Rove give us the correct record. we can lessen the charges if you can offer corrobating evidence of the following witnesses or you can take the fall for this crime in total. The variations and gradations of felonies and misdemeanors is huge! And nothing is off the table for Rove so if you want immunity let's hear what you have to tell us and show us.... Turdblossom fried...

:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
123. Rove will lie and provide disinfo to grand jury, knowing Bush will pardon
He knows testimony of others to a large extent and will do anything to protect Bush from a
criminal charge. Fitz. may have something Rove doesn't know about, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneAngryDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
126. I hate to Ask something...
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 04:54 PM by OneAngryDemocrat
that might have already been posted, but...

Could this particular story indicate a PLEA AGREEMENT between Fitzgerald and Rove?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
130. WTF is up with the title of this thread?
The article very clearly states that Rove could still be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #130
131. It's somebody's idea of a headline,
I guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
135. Perhaps another scenario:
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 05:37 PM by phiddle
That the investigation has uncovered NEW areas/charges, Rove was notified that he was a target in those, and volunteered to testify. I don't think that he would volunteer concerning material he had already covered in testimony; the risk of perjury is too great. But if there were new charges arising, this could explain his behavior.
(Edit) The new charges could be perjury; that his testimony conflicted with that of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cshldoc Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
136. He just has to hold out...
..until the NYC subway bombing scheduled for sometime during Ramadan. Then all will be forgotten. 'United We Stand' and all that horsesh*t...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
140. Mods please correct the title of this thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #140
170. As the news broke, that's the way the story was reported.
Hence, the headline... heat of the moment, but reported verbatim as the story broke, I assure you.

Also, as of 2:00 am EDT, no indictments.

I promise you... I take the LBN forum very seriously and meant no disservice, nor hysteria, in the subject title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
141. No wonder there is a Terra Lert in NY
:rofl:


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #141
153. That's what I've been thinking. The timing and subject of Bush*'s speech,
today, sounded like a very strange non sequitur to me. But now I get it. Distraction is the name of the game with this gang...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty1 Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #153
159. The timeing of the New York subway scare was no coincidence...
That is just the staging for the HUGE distraction what will be coming down soon. The big speech about "enemies" plotting in Iraq by * today.
I'm betting the timing will occur within a couple of weeks. Just before Fitz's big pronouncements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #159
165. I realize that now, especially after reading more of the articles posted
here and listening to Olbermann. I can't believe that I was confused by Bush*'s seeming non sequitur, since this speech made no sense to me in the context of what considered I considered to be the real news, the DeLay accusations, let alone the pending indictments for Rove and Libby. But, in my defense, I was all caught up in taking my dog to the vet, today, and I was worried, so was distracted. But my dog's prognosis is good, and I get it now. I am sure familiar with their distraction tactics, after almost six years. My friend, who is one of us, says that a terror alert makes sense to her, since the Yankees are back in NY, followed by an influx of tourists, but we know their game by now. And distraction is the name of it...:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kma3346 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #159
177. That's exactly what I was thinking yesterday
It's too coincidental and the speech yesterday seemed very weird to me--it almost seemed to be aimed at preparing the public for something.

I'm also worried about some kind of major terrorist "distraction" that will delay the completion of this grand jury and result in martial law. And I'm particularly worried about something happening in Chicago--particularly the Chicago subway system, which I heard somewhere is near (under?) the courthouse. This makes me very nervous. I hate to be so paranoid, but yesterday I started getting the jitters when I heard that Rove was going to testify again.


:tinfoilhat: :scared: :scared: :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #141
155. Damn...can they be that stupid...We know all the tricks....n/t
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #141
171. I've been at work, and out of touch, since the Rove story first broke.
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 01:06 AM by VolcanoJen
While driving home and listening to the radio, I learned that the New York subway was under heightened security.

I laughed, and then felt ashamed that "boy crying wolf to distract America" was in full-effect.

Apparently, DHS disputes the heightened thread, which plays out pretty much as predicted.

I'm watching the repeat of Paula Zahn now, and she's talking about a threat involving, and I quote, "baby carriages and briefcases."

For crying out loud. Does it get more colorfully hysteric?

Now, Jamie McIntyre claims the threat is "highly classified" but might be related to a raid in Iraq involving new CIA information on Al-Qaeda operations.

Full-effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
146. He's breaking. Give up your buddies, Rove. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
149. Fitz should not listened to Karl Rove. Just let his actions speak.
They say "character assassination & slander & treason & lying under oath & outing government agent & money laundering" = INDICTMENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
150. Almost time for a frog march
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
152. What offer.....?
Do the Bush sh*theads know how much they're destroying our country? Not to mention the MSM sh*theads who are ignoring all the signs...errgghh. Where's our Woodward and Bernstein for this generation...dammit to hell !!!!!???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
156. To Rove
"We Know What You Did Last Summer"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
157. We will see him in cuffs one day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #157
163. And in one of these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
158. Rove to Testify Again in CIA Leak Case (LAT)
Federal prosecutors warn they cannot guarantee the presidential adviser won't be indicted.


WASHINGTON -- Presidential adviser Karl Rove has agreed to give last-minute testimony to a grand jury in the ongoing investigation into the leak of a covert CIA agent's identity.

It is unclear why Rove has been asked to make another trip — his fourth — to the grand jury investigating who leaked the name of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

(snip)

After New York Times reporter Judith Miller testified before the grand jury last week, Luskin said, "I was advised ... that might like his further cooperation and the prosecutor affirmed that he has made no decision on whether to charge Karl," Luskin said.

(snip)

"Certainly, it's not particularly good," said the Justice Department official. "What, exactly, the significance is, I can't say. But it can't be good."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-100605leak_lat,0,7095414.story?coll=la-home-headlines

I don't have a link to the NPR story I heard a few minutes ago that said Rove has NO IMMUNITY for this testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
160. Not so "brainy" after all, is he?
Looks like the little man-pig was outsmarted by a mile.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
176. CBS-Testimony A Risky Move For Rove
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 09:14 AM by Algorem
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/07/politics/main924554.shtml

Testimony A Risky Move For Rove

WASHINGTON, Oct. 7, 2005

Law professor Stephen Gillers said it was unusual for a witness to be called back to a grand jury four times and that the prosecutor's legally required warning to Rove is "an ominous sign" for the presidential adviser.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(CBS/AP) President Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove, has been called to testify for the fourth time before the grand jury investigating the leak of a CIA officer's name.

CBS News Senior White House correspondent Bill Plante reports the potential bad news for Rove is that even though he was told earlier he was not a specific target of this investigation he has now been warned there is no guarantee he won't be indicted.

Rove offered in July to return to the grand jury and Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald accepted last Friday, lawyers familiar with the investigation said Thursday, speaking only on condition of anonymity...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
180. look out for more terror attacks
apparently 4 people were 'caught' trying to blow up the NY subway which suggests that this was a cloak to cover the front pages when Rove gets indicted but it was botched. Seems like Cheney will be in there somewhere too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC