Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill would give Bush $50B more for wars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:48 PM
Original message
Bill would give Bush $50B more for wars
http://newsobserver.com/24hour/politics/story/2753625p-11349311c.html

Published: Sep 26, 2005
Modified: Sep 26, 2005 2:39 PM

Bill would give Bush $50B more for wars

By LIZ SIDOTI, ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate would give President Bush $50 billion
more for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as part of a $440 billion
defense spending measure a panel approved Monday.
<snip>
The House already has approved $45 billion more for the wars as part
of its $409 billion version of the bill providing money for the
Defense Department for the budget year that begins Oct. 1.

Both the Senate and House versions provide for a 3.1 percent pay raise
for the military, but the bills differ in other areas. The conflicts
must be sorted out before Congress sends the final bill to the
president for his signature.

Overall, Congress already has given the president about $350 billion
for combat and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan and fighting
terrorism worldwide since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, according to
the Congressional Research Service, which writes reports for
lawmakers. That total includes $82 billion that lawmakers approved
in May.
<snip>

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. another 50 billion for killing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. gee shock!
and Katrina is *only* going to cost $100 billion now - surplus money available just in the nick of time.

One NO vote here for $50 billion to kill how many thousands more?

HOW MANY GOD DAMNIT! HOW MANY MUST DIE IN THIS ILLEGAL WAR!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevereno Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unbelievable!
How are we going to pay for all this? This a senseless war and people are dying. If we continue this we are heading ourselves Broke country for generations to come. This must stop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugar Smack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU, Stevereno!
How low can he go, I wonder? What's beneath contempt? Whatever it is, that's what I feel for Bush. First off, the NOLA crisis is far, far from over, it's only going to get worse, and everyone knows it. How the House can approve such a thing is beyond my imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Welcome to DU.
How will we pay? My guess is they'll start ending the New Deal programs conservatives have been so eager to kill since their inception. The war on terra is more important, you see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have a dumb question - suffering a brain fart. What was it that
pushed the DoD budget until after the recess? I remember they took up something else over it, it was something stoooopid, but I can't remember what the heck it was....

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Gun liability?
From The Hill:

http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Business/092005_defense.html

The defense bill was pulled after a veto threat over torture.
Gun liability legislation took its place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. That was the one! Thanks!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bill would give Bush $50B more for wars
http://www.sacbee.com/24hour/politics/story/2753625p-11349311c.html

The Senate would give President Bush $50 billion more for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as part of a $440 billion defense spending measure a panel approved Monday.
Reflecting a post-Hurricane Katrina debate about the role of the military in domestic affairs, the bill also will require that a report be provided on how National Guard units in neighboring states can be used to assist those affected by natural disasters.

Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, the chairman of the defense appropriations subcommittee, said lawmakers and staff members were still working on the language.


wonder how much of that $50B could be used to help rebuild New Orleans and the other areas affected

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Criminal enablers .. that's all the Congress is anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. More wars, more oil, less school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Maybe the dems will filibuster this?
Naw, that would require backbone and I'm sure they're saving the filibuster for "something" else. Like when they nominate Judge Brown to SCOTUS, - yeah, that's when they'll filibuster! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defiant1 Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's just great....
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Who the Hell would vote YES on a bill like this?? They should be FIRED!!nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. And my friends if Congress gives it to him THEY ARE LIABLE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh Just Great. More Fuel for his Fire. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. U.S. Senate panel clears $50 billion for Iraq war

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N26284266.htm

U.S. Senate panel clears $50 billion for Iraq war

WASHINGTON, Sept 26 (Reuters) - Pushing to get money to the Pentagon for the Iraq war, a U.S. Senate subcommittee on Monday approved a $440.2 billion defense spending bill with a $50 billion emergency fund to finance the war into next year.

The fiscal 2006 bill from the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee cuts $7 billion from President George W. Bush's request and is nearly $1 billion below current levels, excluding the emergency funds spent on Iraq and Afghan wars. Ted Stevens, chairman of the subcommittee, said a range of programs were trimmed to meet Congress' budget limits.

"It's an unhappy year," said Stevens, a Republican from Alaska. "I think there's a great deal that has to be done to bring our military into the posture it needs for the future and it's hard to do when things like (hurricanes) Katrina and Rita are on the scene."

Stevens said he also intends to use the defense spending bill to lay the groundwork for a system to activate the National Guard for major disasters in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elvisbear Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I hope Stevens' plan doesn't include building any bridges.
"Stevens said he also intends to use the defense spending bill to lay the groundwork for a system to activate the National Guard for major disasters in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sh%t. I was hoping for a blank check for life.
Killing and murder comes with a price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bush is like a 3-year-old in a toy store
"I want that... and that... and that... and that..." with no concept that you can't just take what you want without paying for it. "It's sitting right there, Mommy, why can't I have it? I want a war, can I have $50 billion?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. As I remember
Clinton gave them more than 3.1 percent raise. And the cost of living is going up with the new Bush Gas prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. I wonder how much
down the rat hole for death and destruction before our "opposition" finally says enough is enough? One trillion, three trillion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Katrina set back Bush's plans for IRAN invasion
MAJORITY of the public thinks that federal funds should go to relief efforts here in the USA, not for IRAQ. Imagine what the reaction would be to an Iran attack now?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Congress kept feeding the war machine until the bitter end of Vietnam
The 2-party political system is incapable of reversing course in Iraq, just as it was in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. How much public education would $50 billion pay for?
How about dental care, or medical care?

How about all three?

And... why is it again teachers don't make $80-$100K per year? Police? Firefighters?

Why don't we overfund what we know is useful, and necessary? Why do we instead overfund things that only kill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. Exactly.
And we can't have universal healthcare in this third-world country b/c what, it's "too expensive"? But we can piss away billions of $$ on an insane, unjustified, illegal war. Absolute insanity. Exactly the opposite to fiscal responsibility (and nazis claim fiscal resp.), whereas funding universal healthcare (for instance) would be fiscally responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maggie_May Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kiss your social security bye bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why put a cap on it? Just give Boosh a blank check!
Instead of bleeding us slowly, why not do the human thing you fucking Repukes? Let Congress and Boosh go crazy on spending, no limit! Get it over with already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. monopoly money
i feel like he is just PLAYING! it's like it's all a game to him. someone posted some great photos the other day, one of which was gwb in the sandbox with his army toys. THAT feels like the reality to me. he has no sense, he just wants to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. $1.7 billion. The amount bush said this war would cost us.
bush was dead wrong, as always.

Americans who support bush; stupidest MFers on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. Time to clean house! These spineless Dems are beyond hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
31. Not One Penny More!
If he doesn't have the brains to call off the adventure, then let's close the public purse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. That won't be enough money.
We are currently spending $200 million a day in Iraq. If they budget $50 billion for Iraq this year, they will only end up paying $135 million per day.

Either expect congress to give the military more money, or the insurgency in Iraq to flare up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. Bill would give Bush $50B more for wars
Posted on Mon, Sep. 26, 2005


Bill would give Bush $50B more for wars

LIZ SIDOTI

Associated Press


WASHINGTON - The Senate would give President Bush $50 billion more for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as part of a $440 billion defense spending measure a panel approved Monday.

Reflecting a post-Hurricane Katrina debate about the role of the military in domestic affairs, the bill also will require that the National Guard provide a report on how Guard units in neighboring states can be used to assist those affected by natural disasters.

Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, the chairman of the defense appropriations subcommittee, said lawmakers and staff members were still working on the language, which will be added when the full Appropriations Committee takes up the measure.

"What we are looking at is when the National Guard should be triggered to come into a state to assist," Stevens said. "We aren't going to mandate it. We are going to ask for a report as to how it should be done and figure out if it is possible to develop a plan for that."

The House already has approved $45 billion more for the wars as part of its $409 billion version of the bill providing money for the Defense Department for the budget year that begins Oct. 1.


snip


http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/politics/12748549.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hegemony Cricket Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Ted Stevens in "How to say nothing with 27 words"
"We are going to ask for a report as to how it should be done and figure out if it is possible to develop a plan for that."

So, they're going to have a meeting to request a written series of meetings about how one would go about developing a plan...hopefully coming to the conclusion that a plan could indeed be developed.

Wow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. and now he's trying to convince us to let the military handle
natural disasters at home.

and we let him. we do. when are we going to be rid of this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. And they have no idea where the money is going or who's stealing
it or how well the contractors are doing. But we have to keep spending. Why are these people not being impeached by the citizens of this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
38. oh well..
I actually read "Bill would give Bush $50B for more wars".
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
39. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. What a waste! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC