Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush says ‘diversity’ key for next top court pick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:57 AM
Original message
Bush says ‘diversity’ key for next top court pick

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9491993/

Bush says ‘diversity’ key for next top court pick
President hints he may choose a woman or member of ethnic minority
Supreme Court Fact Finder

WASHINGTON - President Bush hinted on Monday that his next nominee for the Supreme Court would be a woman or a minority, saying that “diversity is one of the strengths of the country.”

The president also expressed optimism that the Senate would confirm John Roberts as chief justice this week — which seems virtually certain.

Bush, asked about his next nominee, said “I will pick a person who can do the job. But I am mindful that diversity is one of the strengths of the country.” The president is under pressure from many quarters — including his wife — to pick a woman or a minority for the seat of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who is retiring.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's playing "Blues Clues".... anyone know "who" he means?
LOL:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. JC Watts n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can you say, "Janice Rogers Brown" or "Gonzales"? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think there's something to what your saying.
If the Dems don't strap on their balls if this is the case. I'll go green!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Better warm up your Greenware.
The Dems will find some (plausible to them) reason for letting yet-
another Bush appointee slip by.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Gonzales....
It has to be......

Don't cha know they already got a negroe on the bench....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Diversity Pool for High Court Justices Too Shallow?
From law.com today:


The pool of qualified, conservative minority and female candidates for the federal bench is better than it was a decade ago, say court scholars and former Republican administration officials, but it is much shallower than the pool of conservative white males and the Democratic pool of minority and female candidates.

In fact, when a number of conservative legal scholars and others following or involved in the nomination process were asked to name, either on or off the bench, the conservative female counterpart to the left's constitutional scholar and advocate Kathleen Sullivan, no names leapt to mind.

"There isn't anyone," echoed Bruce Fein of Washington's Fein & Fein, a former Justice Department official in the Reagan administration. "The closest may be Pamela Rhymer, but she is not quite of the same stature in terms of analytical incisiveness."


http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1127466314856
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. In other words he's going to pick someone that embarasses
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 11:08 AM by noahmijo
whatever the minority group that person belongs to.

I'm already ashamed to be Latino due to the number of them that voted for Bush and Gonzales :(

I can't tell you how many times in English and Spanish I'd screamed to other Latinos that Bush belongs to the brand of Christianity that HATES them and their Catholicism, but nope Bush suckered them in hook line and sinker with the family values bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Ashamed to be Latino? Try walking in this WASP's shoes!
I do claim one Native American ancestor, who lived in 17th Century Virgina. But what the heck, you make the best of what you've got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Thomas does not speak for ME or MY PEOPLE

He speaks for Bush and he speaks for Mrs. Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
40. His votes never deviate from Scalia's
You know what? Thomas doesn't represent blacks. He represents WASPs.
Ask him and he wouldn't be shy to you so.

Thomas is pretty much in lock step with the right-wing. When it comes to thinking, they have no concept of diversity. They can make it LOOK diverse but it won't represent the population they represent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Well stated



"When it comes to thinking, they have no concept of diversity. They can make it LOOK diverse but it won't represent the population they represent."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
42. I'm with you on Gonzalez
I guess some Latinos find solace in having a Latino attorney general - I'd rather have one, of any ethnicity, who cares about issues of importance to Latinos. Sorry, Gonzalez doesn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Diverity wouldn't dare enter into it for CHIEF justice.....
now would it.

Can't have no black chick heading the supremes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. I would like to see someone with diversity of ideas & world view
more than diversity of gender or race.

Fat fucking chance. He will nominate another loyal ideologue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chuck in OHIO Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. So...
How many LIES is that now? Or how many times has "it" opened it's mouth???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Isn't that a litmus test?
I thought Republicans were against affirmative action, which is exactly what he is describing here. He just said that even if there's someone more qualified who is a white male, he will be passed over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. gonzalez
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. He's going to try for Thomas II
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. Then he should appoint a liberal
that would help 'balance' things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. judge judy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. He should pick a moderate, like Jeffrey Collins
Currently the US Attorney for SE Michigan. He was a criminal court judge in Detroit prior to his appointment and I like him because he sent the guy who threw the woman off the Belle Isle bridge away for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. So what, a Presbyterian instead of another white bread Episcopalian?
Although the person who's an embarrassment to his or her political identity is a good bet.

Curious, though; I thought that conservatives were dead set against preferences or quotas. They always want the best good old boy for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. You want scary? Given Bush's mindset, here's my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. That's SCARY
Look at the eyes on Coulter. She is possessed by something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bush Drops 'Diversity' Hint About Nominee
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/09/26/national/w084007D94.DTL

President Bush hinted on Monday that his next nominee for the Supreme Court would be a woman or a minority, saying that "diversity is one of the strengths of the country."


The president also expressed optimism that the Senate would confirm John Roberts as chief justice this week — which seems virtually certain.


Bush, asked about his next nominee, said "I will pick a person who can do the job. But I am mindful that diversity is one of the strengths of the country." The president is under pressure from many quarters — including his wife — to pick a woman or a minority for the seat of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is retiring.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsewell Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. What could be more diverse than a liberal justice?
Do it, George!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Let the torturers have a chance at the Supreme Court. They have
been so underrepresented since slavery was abolished.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Alberto Gonzales it is.
Mr. Torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Todd B Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Either him or..
Janice Rogers Brown, that is.

*shudders*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Gonzalez?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Bingo...
...Democrats-Diversity is people who THINK different
Republicans-Diversity is people who LOOK different...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. You got that right.
I am Hispanic and I do NOT view Gonzales as representing diversity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. If diversity is good, why did you send up a RW idelogue for CJ?
A tacit admission by * that Roberts was a fully political appointment to appease the RW wackos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Clarence Thomas Equaled Diversity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dretceterini Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. nominations
This mindless nutcase this diversity is the difference in views between Falwell and Robertson..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Spencer Abraham..
...former Secretary of Energy, former Senator from Michigan, former law school professor.

Bush carried the Arab American vote big-time in 2000, lost it big time in 2004.

Also looks good overseas -- we're not a bunch of reflexively anti-Arab bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
37. Emilio Garza is my guess
Of course he was my guess last time too, so what do I know.

Or maybe a Justice named Priscilla.

Both Texans anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. translation:
I'm looking for a modern house negro...anyone seen a modern house negro around? Let me know...I'm looking!!!:sarcasm: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. A modern house negro can be in any color...
It's a person who sucks up to a master at the expense of his own people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2DleftofU Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. So true
We fight so that repressed people can enjoy basic human rights and equality, and then a few have to ruin it by having the temerity to join the enemy. How sharper than a serpent's tooth indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. Diversity = Not Rich Anglo Saxon = Middle Class White Male???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
43. How will this play with his base?
Don't they consider any nod to affirmative action tantamount to hiring an unqualified candidate and denying a more qualified white candidate the job? That's the level at which their pea brains see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. RW Assholes love Uncle Tom/Aunt Jemima minorities
It's ok, as long as it's a "good nigger" or "good spick".

Clarence Thomas one more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
45. Gonzales
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 04:12 PM by txaslftist
Gonzales is pro-choice, so he's the perfect candidate.

That way the GOP ensures Roe v. Wade survives to use to kick liberals with for another thirty years; they can claim that the Democrats forced them to pick an Hispanic; they can tell the Hispanics that the Democrats don't love them if Dems oppose (which they should), gaining Hispanic votes...

Gonzales is the perfect Rovian candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
49. basically --> Clarence Thomas, part 2. Mama's 2nd Token.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 01:14 AM by NuttyFluffers
doesn't matter who he picks, it'll follow that same rough guideline.

can we say Uncle Tom's lean-to extention? i knew that we could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC