Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Many Contracts for Storm Work Raise Questions ("very apprehensive")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:29 PM
Original message
NYT: Many Contracts for Storm Work Raise Questions ("very apprehensive")
Many Contracts for Storm Work Raise Questions
By ERIC LIPTON and RON NIXON
Published: September 26, 2005


WASHINGTON, Sept. 25 - Topping the federal government's list of costs related to Hurricane Katrina is the $568 million in contracts for debris removal landed by a Florida company with ties to Mississippi's Republican governor. Near the bottom is an $89.95 bill for a pair of brown steel-toe shoes bought by an Environmental Protection Agency worker in Baton Rouge, La.

The first detailed tally of commitments from federal agencies since Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast four weeks ago shows that more than 15 contracts exceed $100 million, including 5 of $500 million or more. Most of those were for clearing away the trees, homes and cars strewn across the region; purchasing trailers and mobile homes; or providing trucks, ships, buses and planes.

More than 80 percent of the $1.5 billion in contracts signed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency alone were awarded without bidding or with limited competition, government records show, provoking concerns among auditors and government officials about the potential for favoritism or abuse.

Already, questions have been raised about the political connections of two major contractors - the Shaw Group and Kellogg, Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton - that have been represented by the lobbyist Joe M. Allbaugh, President Bush's former campaign manager and a former leader of FEMA.

"When you do something like this, you do increase the vulnerability for fraud, plain waste, abuse and mismanagement," said Richard L. Skinner, the inspector general for the Department of Homeland Security, who said 60 members of his staff were examining Hurricane Katrina contracts. "We are very apprehensive about what we are seeing."...


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/26/national/nationalspecial/26spend.html?hp&ex=1127707200&en=12b2f5f6d16da01e&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. "fraud, plain waste, abuse and mismanagement"
In other words, the last 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's wonderful day in the neighborhood. Can you say rape and pilage?
I quess they can't shoot the real looters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Santa has come to the Repugs again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kind of funny (sadly) - rePugs can't NOT be crooked! No surprise here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. you thought our Skinner had a thankless job...
imagine being the Inspector General for DHs, the most crooked of them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's see, how long is it going to take to clean up after Katrina?
Six months? A year? Two years? And the rush to issue several no-bid contracts of over half-a-billion dollars each in less than 2 weeks was... why???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. i once worked for a Bus company that got a contract they cold not meet,
they bought a bunch of OLD City busses and OLD Coaches from Mexico.. apparently with some Jamaican cocaine money.. the Rasta was really belligerent about the drivers not wanting to drive busses without brakes, steering, turn signals and lights..etc

I mean REALLY BILLIGERANT... they were driving soldiers too.

the Mexicans from across the boarder would drive anything.. minimum wage in mexico is $4.60 a DAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why don't they just hire Halliburton to do the study.
I am sure they would be the only ones in the world who could adequately do a study about cronyism and waste and fraud. They have been completely honest and above board to date so give them the chance to uncover abuse. I bet we would have a spotless record of clean contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Award them the study on a no-bid, hours and materials plus contract.
After all, we are in a hurry for it, they have the expertise, and it's all Clinton's fault anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Katrina clean-up work under scrutiny
Katrina clean-up work under scrutiny
Report: Homeland Security inspector says much of $1.5B in contracts sealed with only a handshake.
September 26, 2005: 6:41 AM EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - More than 80 percent of the $1.5 billion in contracts signed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to clean up after Hurricane Katrina were awarded without bidding or with limited competition, the New York Times reported Monday.

The newspaper, citing government records, said some of the bids are provoking concern among auditors and government officials about the potential for favoritism or abuse.

The first detailed tally of commitments from federal agencies since Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast four weeks ago shows more than 15 contracts exceed $100 million, including five of $500 million or more. Most were for clearing trees, homes and cars strewn across the region; purchasing mobile homes; or providing trucks, ships, buses and planes.

Already, the Times said, questions have been raised about the political connections of two contractors -- the Shaw Group (Research) and Kellogg, Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton (Research) that have been represented by lobbyist Joe Allbaugh, President Bush's ex-campaign manager and former head of FEMA.
(snip/...)

http://money.cnn.com/2005/09/26/news/economy/katrina_bids.reut/index.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11.  Kellogg, Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton
CHENEY'S PIG FRIENDS

DIP THEIR SNOUTS IN THE PUBLIC TROUGH

What else do you expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's time that States reject Federal help!!!.Time to stand on their own!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC