Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US court upholds enemy combatant's detention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MrBadExample Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:36 AM
Original message
US court upholds enemy combatant's detention
From here:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that U.S.President George W. Bush has the power to detain Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen who has been held for more than three years as a suspected enemy combatant without any charges being brought against him.

"The exceedingly important question before us is whether the president of the United States possesses the authority to detain militarily a citizen of this country who is closely associated with al Qaeda," appeals court Judge J. Michael Luttig wrote for the three-judge panel.

"We conclude that the president does possess such authority," said Luttig, a conservative who has been under consideration by the Bush administration for a possible Supreme Court nomination.

Padilla, a former Chicago gang member and convert to Islam, initially was suspected by U.S. officials of plotting with al Qaeda to set off a radioactive "dirty bomb" in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. bye-bye US constitution & rule of law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Fuck the Constitution. fuck the rule of law: the people are Cheneyed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think the Reichstag is burning. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. No, 9/11 was the Reichstag-Katrina/New Orleans is our KristallNacht & this
ruling is the sign of the danger ahead....Next is the GOP and Neo-cons using Congress in the next 30 days to get rid of Posse Comitatus Act. Then the coup is complete...

Goodbye America...without your Constitutional rights of protection against detention and the right to an attorney and being held without charges, it could be any of us in the future and we can become detainees, be "relocated" and held at a Gitmo and no one will ever be able to do anything about it.

:scared: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is fucking horseshit.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is al Qaeda Mentioned In The Constitution Somewhere.
Because if it isn't, I don't see how membership should have any bearing on a ruling of Constitutionality.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can this go to the supremes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. A political ruling, not a judicial one. Another BushCo crony
getting in on the act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes. Clearly Judge Luttig is bidding for a SCOTUS spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. just what I thought...
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 11:32 AM by xxqqqzme
his named just moved 2 the top of the list.


What was that quote of blivets** - 'just as long as I'm the dictator'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unbelievable!
Blatantly, clearly unconstitutional. Has been for 3 years. And a Federal Court upholds it?

10 years ago, had an American citizen been held in a foreign jail for years without charges, people would have demanded we send in troops to get him out. Now look at us.


"Bye Bye Miss American Pie
Drove my Chevy from the Levee, but the gas tank ran dry
And now they've killed the Constitution with lies
Singing 'Today the USA died.'"


I want my USA back NOW, damnit!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bush Administration Wins Appeals Court Ruling on Padilla Case
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aSCf164bIvnE&refer=us

Bush Administration Wins Appeals Court Ruling on Padilla Case
Sept. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The Bush administration can indefinitely detain a U.S. citizen it determines to be an enemy combatant in the war on terrorism, a federal appeals court ruled.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, ruled against Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen and a Muslim convert. The administration said he took up arms against the U.S. in Afghanistan and was recruited by al-Qaeda to carry out terrorist attacks in the U.S. The president has the authority to detain such a person, the appeals court said, reversing a lower court's order.

``We conclude that the president does possess such authority pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force Joint Resolution enacted by Congress in the wake of the attacks on the United States of Sept. 11, 2001,'' the three-judge panel said in an order posted on its Web site today.



To contact the reporter on this story:
Cary O'Reilly in U.S. District Court in Washington at caryoreilly@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: September 9, 2005 10:19 EDT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. gulag time
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good Bye Madison...Hello Stalin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. say good bye to the magna charta
the king is now above the law. our supreme court will rule that we should not base our laws on what the furniners think....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. not a big surprise, but disgusting
Coming soon: "President allowed to summarily execute whoever he feels like killing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Actually, there is nothing preventing him doing so already.
The Leader is above the law. Woe to all who dare question him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. We should auction off the Constitution to the highest bidder.
It's a dead letter we no longer use. I'm sure the Japanese or Chinese would pay top Dollar (for what that's worth!) just to be able to display it in a museum.

Doing so would also free up money wasted on its display in Washington.

But we should keep The Declaration of Independence. We're going to be needing it in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Give it to the Iraqis
They're in need of one and we're not using it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
or so I have been told.

Richard Samp, general counsel of the Washington Legal Foundation, a conservative legal group that had supported the Bush administration in the case, hailed the ruling.

"The courts are ill-equipped to second-guess the president when, acting in his capacity as commander in chief, he makes decisions implicating sensitive matters of foreign policy, national security, or military affairs," Samp said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. US appeals court upholds Padilla detention
WASHINGTON (AFP) - A federal appeals court upheld the military detention of Jose Padilla, a US citizen suspected of plotting attacks in the United States, as an enemy combatant.

The ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overturned a lower court ruling that found President George W. Bush's order to detain Padilla without charges unconstitutional.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050909/ts_alt_afp/usattacksjustice_050909164242


For those interested, the full text of the unanimous decision is at

http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/056396.P.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Back up to SCOTUS, I guess.
Will it WACK the administration, again? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. The two opposing decisions may improve acceptance by SCOTUS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's not like we've been using the Constitution for the last 225 years
Under Bush's fascist rule, Americans no longer have any rights because he says so. :mad: :puke: :wtf: :argh: :grr: :nuke: :scared: :banghead: I'm so god damn mad at this SOB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. I literally shuddered when they said this on NPR....
I keep asking my husband what America's KristallNacht is going to be...He said it just happened in New Orleans....and now this ruling...

I believe the time to go is coming soon.... :scared:

Goodbye my beloved America....without your Constitution, you are dead. :cry:

PS: Why does Judge Luttig's name sound familiar? Anyone know his other rulings or background?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Luttig is a HUGE favorite of conservatives. . .
to be nominated to the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Luttig..
..is a conservative judge often mentioned as a SCOTUS possibility. The other two judges on the court were appointed by Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. Get out your copies of the Constitution...
... and draw a big black LINE through amendment number 6 (or VI)... it no longer applies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. What am I supposed to put on the bar exam ... if I have to take it ...
again?

You get 4th-, 5th- and 6th-Amendment protections unless Chimpy McSmirk decides you are an 'enemy combatant.'

This is disgusting! This recent law graduate is very, very sad right now.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Bye bye, right to a trial by jury. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. All the better reason to make a stand against *s court appointments
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 08:06 PM by Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. appointments?
Clinton appointed the two other judges on this court. The decision was unanimous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think we've finally found O'Connner's replacement!
Yesseree bob!

This one's got all the right qualifications.

Bat shit crazy, fuck the constitution crazy.

He goes to the head of the line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC