Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing to shut down 757 jetliner production in late 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:34 PM
Original message
Boeing to shut down 757 jetliner production in late 2004

SEATTLE -- Boeing Co. will shut down its 757 passenger jet production line in late 2004, after building more than 1,000 of the mid-sized jetliners over the past two decades, the company said Thursday.
The announcement came after Continental Airlines said it was seeking to convert six orders for the jet to less-expensive 737-800 jetliners.

"This decision reflects the market reality for the 757 as well as the growth in range and seating capacity of our market-leading next-generation 737 family," said Alan Mulally, Boeing Commercial Airplanes chief executive. "Over the long term, the increased capabilities of our newest 737s and the exciting potential of the 7E7 will fulfill the market served by the 757."

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/apbiz_story.asp?category=6420&slug=WA%20Boeing%20757
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. 7E7?
Anyone elaborate for me? I thought the next model would be a 787.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I thought that was weird too
They're nicknaming the 7E7 the Dreamliner. Most of it will be built overseas and assembled somewhere in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Here's Boeing info on 7E7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. IMAGE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just a thought...
But I'd vote for any candidate that forces Boeing/Airbus to build COACH seats that actually fits a 6'1" adult male.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And a lav you can change a diaper in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think the 777 does have that
One or two of the 777 lavatories have HUGE rooms for that purpose (Or at least on the airline that I flew the 777 on - can't recall). Ask the flight attendant and they'll show you which one to hunt for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Here! Here! I second that!
>>I'd vote for any candidate that forces Boeing/Airbus to build COACH seats that actually fits a 6'1" adult male.<<

I second that! says this 6'2" 220 lb adult male...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. The Triple-7 does.
I flew coach from Frankfurt to Chicago on a UAL version and it was pretty damn comfortable. (I'm 6'0").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Airbus
I had this discussion over at an airline site
and it really peeved me off
John Kerry spoke yesterday in Washington
talking about how Airbus gets subsidized by
Europe, and how he would if President work
to stop that, which I think is a great idea
It is unfair for them to do that while Boeing
does not.
Something this misadministration is not doing to
protect our workers


JOHN KERRY PRESIDENT 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Don't worry the US aircraft manufacturers get their own subsidies too.
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 06:04 PM by JohnyCanuck
In the form of nice juicy deals from the Pentagon.


Arizona Sen. John McCain is blasting the Pentagon's approval of a

The Defense Department Friday announced that it has approved an arrangement in which he U.S. Air Force will lease Boeing 767 aircraft to be used as fuel tankers. They will replace the existing fleet of tankers and can be used to refuel other aircraft while in flight.

McCain said the lease deal is a waste of federal money and it would be less expensive to modernize the existing air tanker fleet or to just buy new planes. The Republican senator said the Pentagon has not cooperated with Congressional inquiries on the issue and has not followed procedures for studying alternatives to the lease deal.

"In all my years in Congress, I have never seen the security and fiduciary responsibilities of the federal government quite so nakedly subordinated to the interests of one defense manufacturer," said McCain in a statement.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2003/05/19/daily61.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Boeing get's more than it's share of Subsidies
Washington bends over for Boeing every day! And they get a lot of pork from the Military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. There goes Renton
But, on the up side, when Boeing sells off all that prime waterfront property on Lake Washington, I'm sure some enterprising developer will build a nice business park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. If you like superfund management!
Just look at the creosote mill Paul Allen wanted to develop. Soil will be toxic for hundreds of years! South Lake Washington is a danger zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have alway's hated that plane
it's single LONNNNNNNNG aisle is no fun to walk down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC