Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Presidential Hopefuls Split on Iraq Vote - (Gephardt to vote yes)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:28 AM
Original message
Presidential Hopefuls Split on Iraq Vote - (Gephardt to vote yes)
mods, I did a search and did not find this story posted, delete if dupe.

<http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&ncid=703&e=4&u=/ap/20031015/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_iraq>


<snip>WASHINGTON - Democratic presidential candidate Dick Gephardt said Wednesday he will support President Bush's $87 billion request for Iraq and Afghanistan.




why, oh why is Dick voting for this bill? Will he stand shoulder to shoulder with AWOL in the Rose Garden again?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I might some people mad by posting this but . . .


The Waltz of the Silver Plum Yes Men (here we go again)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
short bus president Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. nice!
:thumbsup:

"If the tutu fits," you buncha useless friggin DINOs!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Hey, Short Bus,
long time no see! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. not mad, but...
I just think it is stupid. It's arguable whether it was ever funny, but it's been posted so many times that it's just extremely irritiating, not to mention borderline sexist and/or homophobic and/or insulting to ballet dancers.

By the way, Gep's position on this will probably cost him my vote. I've been leaning toward voting for him, and I'll be looking for how he justifies it when it comes up in debates, but I can't see how he'll be able to do it. It's just too much money, and Bush hasn't proven he has any kind of idea what he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. What a sweet bunch of twerps!!!
Great Photo!!!

I need to place that on the back of my car!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sungkathak Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. You hit the point
They are the horses kept by insider group. To make sure if Bush can't win the race, the champion will always fall in same hand.

Howard Dean is an exceptional. He is supported by public not interest group. To prevent his victory, they add another horse, W. Clark, to block Dean's track by stealing Dean's opinion. And activate media to propagand on Clark, even said Clark leads over others. Poll number is one tool to conduct publics sentiment. And naive people believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. If the money were going to the "troops" then I would say
we've got to help them out. And let the tax cuts from the wealthy corporations help, too. But I heard that relatives of our Soldiers are buying "armor" for them and I'm not sure there is any provision in this money for our Soldiers.

Am I being too cynical thinking this money is for halliburton and that ilk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm sure that a big bulk of that money will go to AWOL's buddies
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 11:57 AM by MoonAndSun
in big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Bush's War Chest.....V's...Reconstruction
SNIP: So is a certain amount of campaign cash, cycled back from those who profit in the reconstruction. Against the backdrop of a treasury-draining scheme to remake the world, a few million dollars in corporate contributions to a sitting president may seem insignificant, but one can be sure they matter to Bush—and to his political opponents. For Democrats, the spectacle of a Republican administration larding out contracts to close allies is a political disaster.

< http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0342/trilling.php >

Pay back time...Bush awards rich buddies with lucrative contracts to rebuild Iraq...they in turn fill his re-election war chest....there oughta be a law..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The army has already gotten the MONEY for the armor.
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 11:48 AM by revcarol
Already appropriated. Not one penny of this money goes for armor.And after Halliburton/Bechtel get through with it, very little money for troop stuff like food and water,and very little for reconstruction stuff like re-establishing electricity and clean water.90% PORK!!

bEING RUSHED THROUGH AS IF IT WERE A REAL EMERGENCY, when the troops have enough money through December, maybe January, and Hallibuton/Bechtel/Dyncorp already can get their money anyway.

THIS IS JUST ANOTHER BLANK CHECK. I hope all those unions who are supporting Gephart realize that their children and grandchildren will pay for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Yes, the ARMOR monies was appropriated and the items in
question were sent a long time ago! That is a FEW of the items were sent a long time ago.

Where is the rest of the monies? Who leaked this about the armor... *it, thinking it would make the people all funky, sad and stuff to push to support this $87 billion coporation give away?

Our troops are living on bare minimum over there and the rest is going to making more weapons and paying off corporations.. PERIOD! It is a leaner army meaning less people and less supplies to keep them up!

War on the cheap as some have said while the BIG $$$ goes into profiteers and MORE KILLING MACHINES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why would ANY Dem do ANYTHING to help support Bush/PNAC?
The same question could be asked of those Dems who are voting to support the Syrian Sanctions bill. Why would any Dem vote to support things that enable Bush/PNAC to complete their plans for more war in the ME, world domination, and ME subjugation? Why would any Dem vote to support Israel's current government, when they fully embrace and support Bush/PNAC's plans, and Bush's "re-election", as well as fascist apartheid?

Don't these Dems realize they are helping the Republicans, and may very well be helping Bush's "re-election"? Don't they realize our economy is going down the tubes, and spending $87B in Iraq isn't going to do anything but enrich a few Bush supporters?

Do these Dems give a damn about this country, or anything not tied to helping their re-election/election efforts?

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dammit Gebhardt.
Make the fucker pay for his war. Make him pay for his war. If the war is worth fight, if it's worth laying down 300 American lives, if it's worth 1800 serious injuries and maimings, then goddamnit, it's worth raising taxes enough to cover the fucking cost.

And if that means Bush's fatcat pals have to forgo their huge fucking tax cuts, then so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gepthart has all those Boeing Bois to please!!!.....What a schmuck!!!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Just when I think
we are getting our backbones back and standing up the GW, out comes Joe and Dick knocking each other down to kiss his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Gephardt just dropped off of my political map
I was at least willing to consider him for VP. Not now. At least he could bargain some! At this stage of the game he's rolling over completely - just like the war resolution - he's cutting the legs out from under the rest of the Democrats. If they'd all stood together on this, maybe they could have had some input. At least make a statement . But this is total acquiecense.

He knows this bill will pass, and he wants to be on the winning side. He just crawled in bed with Holy Joe.

I'm anxiously awaiting Kerry and Edwards' position on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. ANY
Democratic presidential candidate voting 4 this outrage should w/d his name from the field. There is no way a vote 4 this can B justified altho I'm sure they will try. This is going straight N2 the korporate kontributors pockets - not a cent 2 the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Gallup: opposition to this 57% to 41%
http://gallup.com/poll/releases/pr031014.asp
Gephardt is repeating his betrayal from the war resolution - when he undermined the passage of the Biden Lugar amendment which had the votes to pass. He is edging Lieberman in vileness now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sungkathak Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gephardt, a hypocrite
He is the one who introduce the bill to authorize the Iraq war power to President Bush. He stood firmly with Lieberman to support Bush's Iraq war. Now he criticise Iraq war to campaign purpose. He maybe a favourite candidate of insider group, but how can he be supported by a high approve rate with such a character?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. Making it clearer all along why to go for Dean ...
or Kucinich, or Mosley-Braun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC