Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Democrat (Durbin): Abortion Stance Could Halt John Roberts' Bid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:33 PM
Original message
Top Democrat (Durbin): Abortion Stance Could Halt John Roberts' Bid
<<SNIP>>
http://www.lifenews.com/nat1474.html

Top Democrat: Abortion Stance Could Halt John Roberts' Bid Email this

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The number two Democrat in the Senate said Sunday that Supreme Court nominee John Roberts' views on abortions could halt his nomination to the high court. Illinois Sen. Richard Durbin's remarks appear to indicate he will make abortion a litmus test for his confirmation vote.

Durbin told NBC's "Meet the Press" that if Roberts doesn't recognize a right to abortion during questioning by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Roberts would "disqualify" himself from getting Durbin's vote.

Asked if President Bush had the same right to appoint pro-life justices that former President Clinton had to appoint abortion advocates, Durbin insisted, "I'm not looking for a litmus test."

....

However, asked what he would do if Roberts said he did not find a right to abortion in the Constitution, Durbin told "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert, "I wouldn't vote for him. That would disqualify him in my mind."

<</SNIP>>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad but Durbin hasn't veto power. What's the point?...
Will 40 dems filibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why the irrational fear of the words "litmus test"?
Fuck yeah there should be a litmus test. Recognizing women's human rights is a litmus test. That's not unreasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Roberts' appalling memory would be a drawback. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Locking
LifeNews.com isn't a suitable source for this forum. -thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC