Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal court bars enforcement of school patriotism law in Pennsylvania

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 10:33 PM
Original message
Federal court bars enforcement of school patriotism law in Pennsylvania
Federal court bars enforcement of school patriotism law in Pennsylvania

By Martha Raffaele, Associated Press, 7/15/2003 22:31
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) A federal court on Tuesday barred education officials from enforcing a state law that requires public and private school students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance or sing the national anthem each morning.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert F. Kelly agreed with the arguments of several plaintiffs, including a private school in Harrisburg, that the law violates students' right to freedom of expression under the First Amendment.

''I agree that (the law) unconstitutionally interferes with the school plaintiff's ability to express their values and forces them to espouse the commonwealth's views,'' Kelly wrote in issuing a permanent injunction.

The law also requires the American flag to be displayed in every classroom when school is in session.

Under the law, students can decline to recite the pledge and salute the flag on the basis of religious conviction or personal belief, but school officials must notify the parents of students who decline. (snip/...)

http://www.boston.com/dailynews/196/nation/Federal_court_bars_enforcement:.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes!
“The mixing of government and religion can be a threat to free government, even if no one is forced to participate.” JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE STEVENS and JUSTICE O'CONNOR join, concurring in LEE v. WEISMAN, 505 U.S. 577 (1992).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. AMEN! There's a couple of other states with laws similar to this.
I don't think PA will fight this too far - but if someone takes on the law in, say, Texas, they'll take it right to the Supremes.....and lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umcwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Locking,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC