Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich On US Space Weapons, Control Of the World

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:17 AM
Original message
Kucinich On US Space Weapons, Control Of the World
"The Administration is considering putting weapons in outer space, to give the United States the power to control the world. This astronomical arrogance pushes not simply aggression to new heights, but may well preclude our nation from spending money for anything other than weapons, which will cost hundreds of billions of dollars.

"The National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 states that it is "the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind." Space was envisioned as a place of cooperation, of confirming human unity, a place where we could aspire to build a new platform of peace, fulfilling the prophecy of the poet Browning who wrote: "but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a heaven for?"

"What has happened to our country? Why are we projecting fear and paranoia to such heights? Have we so lost our way and our faith that we are prepared to transform the heavens into hell? If the kingdom and the will of God is to be done on earth as it is in heaven, what is to happen when the United States takes nuclear fire up to the gates of heaven?
http://www.rense.com/general65/control.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Space weapons are a really stupid idea.
There is nowhere to hide in space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. In space...
...nobody can hear you scream.

I agree that they're a stupid idea....but space is a big area. Plenty of places to hide...behind a moon. Above a magnetic pole...in a comet's tail...um...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Yeah, you can be far away.
But then it takes a long time to hit something and it can
be seen coming and countered. In any real space war with
current technology all the relevant stuff will be neutered
with missiles and EMP bursts in the first hours and then we
will fight the old way in the rubble. To be sure it offers
some advantages against inferior opponents, but if the US and
Russia,say, got into it all the space placed stuff would be
cratered right away, with nukes if necessary. It's one of
the few things nukes are good for, and even then it's in the
context of mutual suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kucinich for President!!!!!
Star war coming, mate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I'll second that.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here is a link to our space policy
Edited on Thu May-19-05 11:26 AM by Jara sang
per a report of the Select committee on Astronautics and Space Exploration in 1959.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/conghand/spcover.htm

and another one put out by the U.S. Air Force, which is the Warfighters Guide to Space.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/au-18/au180001.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. operational in 18 months
"Everett Dolman, a professor at the Air Force’s School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, said Tuesday that work on several technologies — including microsatellites that could be launched to target enemy satellites and satellite-jamming systems — was far enough along that it could be declared operational within 18 months." from the yahoo news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. This is really, really scary
It's perhaps the most important issue in the world at the moment. They are obviously trying to do this so fast that most people won't notice until it's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lets control the world, get all of the oil and then destroy the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wasn't this
something he said years ago and everyone made fun of him for talking about it? Hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. yep...
He was ahead of the game, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Yep-HR2977 The Space Preservation Act of 2001 had an "exotic weapons"
portion that disappeared from the revision, HR3616 The Space Preservation Act of 2002.
http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thanks bob!
I knew you would have that. I don't save nearly enough. I am going to save it this time. It seems that it has become once again important. He knew it then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. is china ready to sign on the idea of no weapons in space?
or any other nation that in the future will develop the capacity to develop such defense or offense weapons? russia already has the technology and the ability to destroy satellites.this is not going away and it has to be dealt with now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. We fear everybody because we lost our faith in PEOPLE
...and spewing religiousity like this does not help one bit. Every word of creedence you lend to the Bible through your public office undermines your true intent and reinforces the apocalypse-mongers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. ...or its a way to reach people that otherwise wouldn't listen
I give DK credit for reaching out to people on their level.

DK :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. That is not the job of a democratically-elected lawmaker.
Edited on Thu May-19-05 11:53 AM by cprise
He needs to use associates in the private sector if he wants someone to make a case based on religion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Should people be allowed to speak thier minds? Or not?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'm not a formally religious person, but the first thing
Edited on Thu May-19-05 11:43 AM by GreenArrow
I thought of when I read about this weaponization of space was the "Tower of Babel".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The first thing I thought was
... a gigantic hand pointing a pistol at the Earth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. something like that
crossed my mind as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ho hum, this is old news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. The US system would be able to

take out communication satellites in space. Communication dismemberment has always been a key to military operations including anyone or any country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. But who is going to secure the moon for democracy...
We can't have the moon fall into the hands of terrorists.


</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. On Futurama
Edited on Thu May-19-05 01:43 PM by MN ChimpH8R
Al Gore was the first Emperor of the Moon.

Why did I flash on that? Working too hard. Need to go to DU Lounge... :beer:

But seriously, this may be the stupidest idea yet from Chimpy and Unca Dickkk's gang of imperialist crackheads, I mean, fantasizers. No, I was right the first time: crackheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. For winning ideas, and someone who will stand up...
to BushCo, look no further than Kucinich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. Space based weapons are a wet dream of PNAC
The PNAC neocon ghouls were giddy over the prospect of space based weapons in their report "Rebuilding America's Defenses."

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Dennis rocks.
Great statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmytuckett Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. rocking
i agree.

www.subbionic.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. locking
Source cited in Original Post does not meet LBN criteria, please feel to repost from another source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. So are we going to start attacking Russia and China's launch
sites preemptively so they can't compete with us in space? What about the EU?

This is truly MAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC