Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove Guided Career of Judicial Nominee in Filibuster Fight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 10:30 PM
Original message
Rove Guided Career of Judicial Nominee in Filibuster Fight
WASHINGTON, May 15 - Justice Priscilla R. Owen of the Texas Supreme
Court declined a chance to be the court's first female chief justice
last year so she could remain one of President Bush's nominees to a
federal appeals court, Texas lawyers and political figures said in
recent interviews.

The decision was one of three crucial moments in her judicial career
in which she seemed to have been guided by the hand of Karl Rove, Mr.
Bush's chief political strategist.

Justice Owen, along with Justice Janice Rogers Brown of the California
Supreme Court, is now at the center of the partisan battle in the
Senate over changing the filibuster rules. Senator Bill Frist of
Tennessee, the Republican leader, said Friday that the two state
justices, whose confirmations have been blocked by Democrats, would be
brought to the Senate floor as part of the fight over changing the
rules.

Justice Owen was, by all accounts, a respected but little-known lawyer
in Houston in 1994 when she was first elected to the State Supreme
Court with Mr. Rove's support and tutelage. Her experience up to then
largely involved obscure legal cases involving pipelines and federal
energy regulations.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/16/politics/16owen.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rove can't be just doing this for a civil servant wage....
maybe someone should figure out what
Rove is really making moneywise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. NYT: Rove Guided Career of Judicial Nominee in Filibuster Fight
Edited on Sun May-15-05 10:57 PM by Pirate Smile
WASHINGTON, May 15 - Justice Priscilla R. Owen of the Texas Supreme Court declined a chance to be the court's first female chief justice last year so she could remain one of President Bush's nominees to a federal appeals court, Texas lawyers and political figures said in recent interviews.

The decision was one of three crucial moments in her judicial career in which she seemed to have been guided by the hand of Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's chief political strategist.



Justice Owen, along with Justice Janice Rogers Brown of the California Supreme Court, is now at the center of the partisan battle in the Senate over changing the filibuster rules. Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, the Republican leader, said Friday that the two state justices, whose confirmations have been blocked by Democrats, would be brought to the Senate floor as part of the fight over changing the rules.

Justice Owen was, by all accounts, a respected but little-known lawyer in Houston in 1994 when she was first elected to the State Supreme Court with Mr. Rove's support and tutelage. Her experience up to then largely involved obscure legal cases involving pipelines and federal energy regulations.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/16/politics/16owen.html?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. well, not so obsure ... let's ask Enron about her energy-related help
http://www.now.org/issues/legislat/nominees/owens.html

Enron's political action committee gave Owen $8,600 for her successful Supreme Court bid in 1994. Two years later, Owen wrote the majority opinion that reversed a lower court order and reduced Enron's school taxes by $15 million. Since 1993, Enron contributed $134,058 — more than any other corporation — to Owen and other members of the Texas Supreme Court. A study by Texans for Public Justice found that the court ruled in Enron's favor in five out of six cases involving the company since 1993.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Owen is Enron dirty. That's about the dirtiest you can get
No, she should not be approved. She's just another corporatist who could care less about the working class. Dump the broad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick to combine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 09:30 PM
Original message
Rove Guided Career of Judicial Nominee in Filibuster Fight
this slimeball seems to be everywhere!!!


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/16/politics/16owen.html

> Rove Guided Career of Judicial Nominee in Filibuster Fight
> By Neil A. Lewis
> The New York Times
>
> Monday 16 May 2005
>
> Washington, May 15 - Justice Priscilla R. Owen of the Texas Supreme Court declined a chance to be the court's first female chief justice last year so she could remain one of President Bush's nominees to a federal appeals court, Texas lawyers and political figures said in recent interviews.
>
> The decision was one of three crucial moments in her judicial career in which she seemed to have been guided by the hand of Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's chief political strategist.......
>
>
> Justice Owen was, by all accounts, a respected but little-known lawyer in Houston in 1994 when she was first elected to the State Supreme Court with Mr. Rove's support and tutelage. Her experience up to then largely involved obscure legal cases involving pipelines and federal energy regulations.
>
> At the time, Mr. Rove was helping to make over the Texas Supreme Court from a bench populated by Democrats widely viewed as favorable to the plaintiffs' bar - the lawyers who sue companies - to the business-friendly Republican stronghold it is today........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalNerd Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. you're right
Edited on Mon May-16-05 09:24 PM by LiberalNerd
this bastard seems to have his grubby little hands in everything, and the majority of people don't seem to care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC