Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military, Law Enforcement Caught in FBI Drug Trafficking Sting Along South

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 11:59 AM
Original message
Military, Law Enforcement Caught in FBI Drug Trafficking Sting Along South
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBGYIV7N8E.html

WASHINGTON (AP) - FBI agents posing as cocaine traffickers in Arizona caught 16 current and former U.S. soldiers and law enforcement personnel who took payoffs to help move the drugs through checkpoints, Justice Department officials said Thursday.


Those charged include a former Immigration and Naturalization Service inspector, a former Army sergeant, a former federal prison guard, current and former members of the Arizona Air National Guard and the state corrections department, and a Nogales, Ariz., police officer, officials said.

All 16 have agreed to plead guilty to being part of a bribery and extortion conspiracy, the result of the nearly 4 1/2-year FBI sting, acting assistant attorney general John C. Richter and FBI agent Jana D. Monroe said.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. damn those few bad apples!
messing everything up!

it's only a very very small percentage of law enforcement that ever ever does anything illegal!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh
I support the troops!

...Never mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewJacksonFaction Donating Member (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. In what way?
In what way? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cash payments were traced to GOP causes such as Tom DeLay's
intra-decade redistricting of Texas. Please dig deeper...


"...former Immigration and Naturalization Service inspector, a former Army sergeant, a former federal prison guard, current and former members of the Arizona Air National Guard and the state corrections department..."

People like this don't just dream up this stuff on their own. They need connections. Connections to foreign governments and knowledgeable of law enforcement efforts. Who would those connections be? Someone who needs a lot of extra secret cash... hhhmmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who's guarding the guards?
This is getting tiresome: those "charged" with protecting society turn out to be the worst offenders.

Total Coverage: The CIA, Contras, and Drugs
News: The CIA-coke connection was detailed long before Dark Alliance -- and the evidence keeps coming

By Eric Umansky

August 25, 1998

You may have seen the headline last month on the front page of the NEW YORK TIMES. (Then again, you may not have, since it ran in a small box on the bottom-left corner.) It announced, "CIA Says It Used Nicaraguan Rebels Accused of Drug Tie." The beginning of that story read:

"The CIA continued to work with about two dozen Nicaraguan rebels and their supporters during the 1980s despite allegations they were trafficking in drugs.... he agency's decision to keep those paid agents, or to continue dealing with them in some less formal relationship, was made by top officials at headquarters in Langley, Va."
In other words, top officials at the CIA knew the agency was working with Contra drug traffickers and didn't do anything about it. But the story, even with that shocking headline, quickly disappeared. None of the other major papers, news magazines, or TV networks reported the NEW YORK TIMES' findings.

(more)

http://www.motherjones.com/news/special_reports/total_coverage/coke.html

And the "call boy/White House" scandals:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=callboy+white+house&spell=1

US service personnel, cops, government agents, Presidential administrations, Congress, etc. etc. etc. involved with illegal sex and drugs while claiming to take the high road, while the rest of us are expected to work hard, "act right," and pay our bills and taxes? This is getting tiresome, and I'm getting fed up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyn Michael Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Ya! Who is
watching the watchers, in short!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. No one would risk this kind of operation for personal gain
with this many people involved. It would be doomed from the start. But if they were working to make some money for a larger organization... (and had a little 'protection' going on...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Like they say in Chicago
The only time you find corruption in the police department is when you look for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. When a society values $$ above all else
what else can one expect? Not an excuse, just a fact of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm having a tinfoil moment.
http://www.steamshovelpress.com/fromeditor24.html

"The Octopus Returns"
by Kenn Thomas

Here's a quick refresher paragraph on the Octopus:

Danny Casolaro was "suicided" in 1992 on the trail of the mother of all conspiracies, a transnational cabal manipulating world political events since World War II called The Octopus. Key to his research was a super-surveillance software called PROMIS, which was given to a crony of Ronald Reagan's as a pay off for the deliverance of $40 million to the Ayatollah Khomeini for the "October Surprise" -- holding on to the 52 American hostages in Iran until after Jimmy Carter lost the 1980 election. The crony profiteered from PROMIS (really owned by a company called Inslaw) by selling it to police agencies throughout the world for the purpose of tracking criminals and extrapolating their next moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. The northern transshipment point for the soldiers busted in Colombia?
An interesting coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. they know the war on drugs is a joke
why not make some profit while the sham is running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. exactly
the only thing the so-called 'War on Drugs' does is ruin the lives of non-violent drug users, and provide a huge cash cow for covert ops. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. In 1972, the US Government said there were 10 million daily pot smokers. .
If we assume the number has stayed constant in the past 30+ years, let's do some math:

In 1972, a "lid" of marijuana was approximately 1 ounce (the usual measure was "three fingers" but the fingers never touched). If we assume 30 joints per bag (fat but not unknown in those days), a pound of pot would yield 480 joints. Let's call it 500 to make the math easier.

Five hundred joints per pound divided into 10 million people means there were approximately 20,000 pounds of marijuana -- 10 TONS OF MARIJUANA -- being smoked every day in America. That's in 1972 -- when a pound cost about $100 and lids went for $10 each.

I don't know present day figures, but for those of you who do, do the math, then tell me: How can you stop something this big? When you hear of a bust at the border that yields 5 tons of grass, bear in mind that's about half a day's supply. And when they boast of busts for "pounds" . . . well, we're talking minutes worth of consumption.

And from what I hear, the price has skyrocketed since 1972. How can anyone expect to stop the smugglers when they're obviously bringing it in by the truckload and making billions of dollars each year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I thought it was expensive when I was a kid.
I don't know how teenagers afford it today. You'd almost have to have a steady job to buy it regularly. But how do you keep a steady job if you're stoned all the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. be responsible...
don't smoke till after work. Just like alcohol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. ...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Anyway, our local news is reporting this now... I still say there's
something big here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. FBI Nabs Troops, Officers in Drug Sting
Edited on Thu May-12-05 05:54 PM by Zorbuddha
TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) - FBI agents posing as cocaine traffickers in Arizona caught 16 current and former U.S. soldiers and law enforcement personnel who took about $220,000 in bribes to help move the drugs through checkpoints, Justice Department officials said Thursday.

Those charged include a former Immigration and Naturalization Service inspector, a former Army sergeant, a former federal prison guard, current and former members of the Arizona Army National Guard and the state corrections department, and a Nogales police officer, officials said.

"Many individuals charged were sworn personnel having the task of protecting society and securing America's borders. The importance of these tasks cannot be overstated and we cannot tolerate, nor can the American people afford, this type of corruption," FBI agent Jana D. Monroe, who directs the bureau's operations in Arizona, said during a news conference in Tucson.

All 16 have agreed to plead guilty to being part of a bribery and extortion conspiracy, the result of the nearly 3 1/2-year FBI sting, acting assistant attorney general John C. Richter and Monroe said. Officials said more arrests are anticipated.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050512/D8A1S6UO2.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Funneling Colombian CIA cocaine into the US is their patriotic duty.
Just like it was when the Reagan adminsitration did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. sadly so
too true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolvedChimp Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. It's too bad
It's too bad that people sworn to protect us will take a bribe to corrupt us. It's equally depressing that the FBI had to spend tax payer money on this 3 1/2 year ordeal. It just plain sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. A vicious circle
A maze without exit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. I used to live in Phoenix....
and hung around with the La Familia crowd.. (The OG's who were living lawfully (mostly) and raising families.) It was common knowledge that a lot of stuff was coming over near Nogales, and the authorities were in on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. Just mules.
I guarantee the "brains" got away.

Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick to combine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northstar Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Military, law enforcement caught in FBI drug sting
Edited on Fri May-13-05 04:22 PM by northstar
<snip>
TUCSON, Arizona (AP) -- FBI agents posing as cocaine traffickers nabbed 16 current and former law enforcement officers and U.S. soldiers who had accepted more than $222,000 in bribes to help move drugs past checkpoints, the government said.
~~snip~~
Those charged include a former Immigration and Naturalization Service inspector, a former Army sergeant, a former federal prison guard, seven members of the Arizona Army National Guard, five members of the Arizona Department of Corrections and a police officer, officials said.
~~snip~~
Hillman said the defendants drove cocaine shipments past checkpoints manned by the government while they wore official uniforms, carried identification and used official vehicles.
~~snip~~
"Many individuals charged were sworn personnel having the task of protecting society and securing America's borders," Monroe said. "The importance of these tasks cannot be overstated and we cannot tolerate, nor can the American people afford, this type of corruption."
<snip>

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/13/fbi.sting.ap/index.html
-------------

The article also states that the defendants were not arrested, and were released on their own recognizance. The prosecutor said they could face a 34-36 month sentence for one conspiracy count, but that the sentence could be less, if they cooperate.

I dunno, maybe I'm old fashioned but this seems like a pretty light sentence for big scale drug trafficking, especially in light of the fact that they were sworn personnel using government ID and equipment to commit and cover for their crimes. I guess violating the public trust (what little is left of it) isn't a serious thing anymore? :shrug:

edited to add link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. It was the uniform that lightened the sentence. If they had been black
and in street clothes, they would each be facing twenty year sentences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Not for a first time offense they wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Border Patrol told to stand down in Arizona
I noticed this story earlier today and wonder if there's any connection.

Border Patrol told to stand down in Arizona

By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

U.S. Border Patrol agents have been ordered not to arrest illegal aliens along the section of the Arizona border where protesters patrolled last month because an increase in apprehensions there would prove the effectiveness of Minuteman volunteers, The Washington Times has learned.

More than a dozen agents, all of whom asked not to be identified for fear of retribution, said orders relayed by Border Patrol supervisors at the Naco, Ariz., station made it clear that arrests were "not to go up" along the 23-mile section of border that the volunteers monitored to protest illegal immigration.

"It was clear to everyone here what was being said and why," said one veteran agent. "The apprehensions were not to increase after the Minuteman volunteers left. It was as simple as that."

Another agent said the Naco supervisors "were clear in their intention" to keep new arrests to an "absolute minimum" to offset the effect of the Minuteman vigil, adding that patrols along the border have been severely limited.


More: http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050513-122032-5055r.htm

TYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. kick
TYY:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC