Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuba, Venezuela offer medial assistance to other countries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:31 AM
Original message
Cuba, Venezuela offer medial assistance to other countries
Edited on Mon May-09-05 08:32 AM by Mika
Cuba, Venezuela offer medial assistance to other countries
http://www.vnanet.vn/NewsA.asp?LANGUAGE_ID=2&CATEGORY_ID=34&NEWS_ID=150063
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on May 8 said that his country and Cuba will carry out a programme entitled "Mision Milagro" with the aim of bringing light to the poor people with eye diseases in the Latin American and Caribbean regions.

According to the programme, the patients with eye diseases will be sent to Caracas in Venezuela for consultations and then to Cuba for treatment. Thousands of Venezuelan patients with eye diseases have already been sent to Cuba for treatment.

The "Mision Milagro" is one of 41 agreements signed between Venezuela and Cuba when President Chavez visited Cuba in late April this year.




See? More threats to the US from Venezuela and Cuba. :eyes:






www.stopbolton.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps they could send some help to the US?
I love Chanvez, but I wish he wouldn't coddle the dictator Castro. The people of Cuba might have a better life than most cariibian countries, but it's still a dictatorship.

When Bush holds hand with the Saudi tyrants, that's wrong. When Chanvez and castro hang out like old chums and give the "Victory" sign together for reporters, that's wrong to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You couldn't be more wrong
Edited on Mon May-09-05 08:48 AM by Mika
http://www.poptel.org.uk/cuba-solidarity/democracy.htm
This system in Cuba is based upon universal adult suffrage for all those aged 16 and over. Nobody is excluded from voting, except convicted criminals or those who have left the country. Voter turnouts have usually been in the region of 95% of those eligible .

There are direct elections to municipal, provincial and national assemblies, the latter represent Cuba's parliament.

Electoral candidates are not chosen by small committees of political parties. No political party, including the Communist Party, is permitted to nominate or campaign for any given candidates.




The Cuban government was reorganized (approved by popular vote) into a variant parliamentary system in 1976.


You can read a short version of the Cuban democratic system here,
http://members.allstream.net/~dchris/CubaFAQDemocracy.html

Or a long and detailed version here,
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0968508405/qid=1053879619/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-8821757-1670550?v=glance&s=books






www.stopbolton.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Castro Has Been Elected Regularly Since 1976
It's a parlamentary system -- nobody runs for president or prime minister per se. Like Tony Blair, Castro ran as a representative in his local district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
31. Read up
before you talk about it, if you want to know.
http://www.georgetown.edu/pdba/Parties/Resumen/Cuba/desc.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. HAH
the party orientation labels are only the editors own impression of the orientation of a party and do in no way represent the parties' own opinions and that inclusion of an result does not reflect any opinion of the legitimacy of the election or the respective election processes.

I'm sorry, I don't accept opinion sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. I'm not
telling you to adopt a Cuban system. And I'm not taking the easy way out. If I presented an independent website that decried the US's elections and leaders, would you accept it? With that kind of disclaimer on it? And if political parties openly plotting to overthrow the USian government were thrown in jail, would you call that the stifling of dissent? I'm not saying thats always the case, I don't have that information, and neither do you. But I know it HAS been the case, same with the 'protesters' who're being paid by external organizations to destabilize the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
125. Whoa there Bucko, the US has only ONE political party
THE CORPORATE PARTY! You can't really be that blind can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
70. Your source leaned on "Freedom House" for its lordly appraisal
of Cuba. Freedom House was created by members of the reactionary right-wing Batista-loving Cuban American National Foundation in Miami.

By the way, "dissident" parties in Cuba are NOT exiles, or they would not be IN CUBA, would they?

Exiles are OUTSIDE Cuba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Stop taking the easy way out!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Izzatso?
CUBAN LIBRARIES SOLIDARITY GROUP PRESS RELEASE

Freedom House - don't believe the hype
28 March 2004

In a communique issued by IFEX on 23 March 2004 it was reported that:

"On 18 March, 2004, Human Rights Watch and Freedom House issued a joint statement with five other U.S.-based human rights groups, condemning the continued imprisonment of human rights activists, independent journalists, librarians and democracy advocates."

If you visit the Freedom House website you are told that "Freedom House, a non-profit, nonpartisan organization, is a clear voice for democracy and freedom around the world."

There is also a list of organisations which fund Freedom House. These include the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

Both USAID and the NED receive funding from the US government to support " pro-democracy" activities in Cuba.

In 2003 Washington gave $6 million to USAID and $1 million to NED, a congressionally funded organisation founded during the Cold War to finance subversion in the former Soviet bloc.

NED pays the salaries of "dissident librarians and journalists". For example, journalists are paid $15 per feature for CubaNet, a Miami-based online news service, which also receives NED support.

Payments for "independent journalists" articles last year came from a $41,000 grant from the NED, according to Cuba Net editor Rosa Berre.

So the US government funds USAID and NED and these organisations fund CubaNet and Freedom House. How, then, can Freedom House claim that it is a " nonpartisan organisation"?
(snip/...)
http://www.cubanlibrariessolidaritygroup.org.uk/releases/28_03_04.html

Don't think Eleanor Roosevelt founded a Cuban "exile" operation, thanks.

Don't call me a "Castro apologist." I'm not apologizing. You know that's red-baiting, don't you? Not acceptable.

Either provide a decent reference, or start educating yourself for more legitimate conversations.



Pretty nasty business, trying to name someone as an enemy of the state, isn't it? Why don't you prove it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
78. He would if Diebold had the concession. Remember the line about
glass houses and throwing rocks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. They are a Parliament, so they don't vote for the head of state.
Edited on Mon May-09-05 09:31 AM by brainshrub
Just because the people don't vote for a head-of-state does not mean it's a dictatorship. Case in point: England.

Castro is a dictator because there are no opposition parties allowed, and those who try to form them are jailed.

BTW: Welcome to DU. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Ditto Canada
also parliamentary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
95. Read up
No political parties, including Communist party, are allowed to put candidates. Candidates are chosen directly by local assemblies of people, not by political parties.

I'm not saying Cuban system is perfect, far from it, but political parties are not an essential criterion for a functional democracy.

And AFAIK Cuba does not jail opposition to the Cuban social model, only traitors who take US money to work against that model. And not even those allways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. They are only allowed to have one political party.
Sorry, I don't buy it. I grew up in SoFla with people who loved, and hated, Castro. (Mostly the later.) I don't hate Castro, but let's not pretend he's something he's not.

Castro is a classic dictator. Perhaps not nearly as brutal as the dictatorships the US supports, but Cuba is not a free country.

In my own opinion, Castro will only hurt chances for Democracy in So America.

By the way, Castro will never die. 300 years from now he'll still be around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't think Castro is about democracy so much as about anti-fascism.
I'm not sure how he hurts the chances of democracy in S. America -- the arc of history in South America seems to be bending pretty nicely towards democracy in the last five or so years, notwithstanding anything Castro has done over the last 50 years.

But Castro definitely does not come across as a danger to political developments in S.A. since his anti-fascism seems to be compatible with the anti-neoliberalism that seems to be taking hold everywhere else in S.A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. Read your Marx
It's inherently pro-democracy. Ditto socialism. So you're basically agreeing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #55
80. Some of the political parties in Cuba
http://www.gksoft.com/govt/en/cu.html
* Partido Comunista de Cuba (PCC) {Communist Party of Cuba}
* Partido Demócrata Cristiano de Cuba (PDC) {Christian Democratic Party of Cuba} - Oswaldo Paya's Catholic party
* Partido Solidaridad Democrática (PSD) {Democratic Solidarity Party}
* Partido Social Revolucionario Democrático Cubano {Cuban Social Revolutionary Democratic Party}
* Coordinadora Social Demócrata de Cuba (CSDC) {Social Democratic Coordination of Cuba}
* Unión Liberal Cubana {Cuban Liberal Union}



Plenty of info on this long thread,
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=6300&forum=DCForumID70







www.stopbolton.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. Didn't you get the memo?
Edited on Mon May-09-05 10:03 PM by GirlinContempt
They're all in jail. Or deported.
Or in a deported jail.
Or jailed in de port.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #55
96. Yup
In capitalism, political power of people (aka wage-slaves) is limited by "market-forces", the Capital. In socialism people have political control over the market forces.

So socialism means real liberty and democracy, capitalism slavery to capital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #96
102. Yep
Socialism is built by and for the people, and therefore serves in their best interests. Capitalism serves the interests of capital. But, people would have to actually READ Marx to realize what they're referring to, which is apparently too much to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #96
103. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #103
107. Actually
It's dependent on where they're working and living. As food, housing, and life needs are either subsidized or free, that is not a poverty wage. Free education, day care, health care, all the things that cost us hundreds of dollars a month, all taken care of! Oh no! Shocking! They don't live in a society where everything is privately owned and costs an arm and a leg. It's a SLAVE WAGE! Thats why they have 6 Dr's for every 1,000 people. (Thats more than double the U.S.) It's slavery. Slaves.

If you're going to pull out numbers like that, the LEAST you could do is try to look at the fact that the economies and lifestyles are so TOTALLY different that, taken into account, it's better than most Latin American countries.

Worried about slave wages in Cuba? lift the embargo's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #108
109. Now you're just TRYING to dumb this down.
You have to be. The black market exists for US goods, and the soaps, toothpaste, etc that you're talking about costs about 2 Cuban pesos, unless you want Dove, illegally smuggled in from the US. Yes, people who want USian products do have a much smaller living wage as they squander it on brands.

Be for private property all you like (though I refuse to refer to it as a right), be for an unsustainable economic structure which actually has far more control over your life than you'd like to believe. But maybe if you actually educated yourself on the Marxist principles you'd come into this with a better understanding of just what Marxism proposes and its effects.

I'm going to have to assume that you're referring to political activists funded by external governments to destabilize the Cuban government. Which is like, so horrible of them to try to stop. Really. I agree. Every country should allow people to organize a violent third-party funded coup within their borders. Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #109
110. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #110
111. Your subject line
AND the fact that you didn't read what I said before going off on a subject you seem to actually hold little knowledge about, has caused me to again back out of this. If you can't even be bothered to read what I've said, I can't be bothered to reply to you anymore. I'm not going to keep restating points for you to ignore and sensationalize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. Someone like that would also think that if you could buy a new Mustang
in 1966 for under $3,000.00, it's an indication that people used to be very poor then, since their cars were so inexpensive.

Impossible trying to encourage them to learn anything. Obviously they never travel anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #114
116. It's just impossible
to debate with anyone who doesn't even bother to read what you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #116
117. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #117
122. Axioms
The basic fault in your reasoning is that you suppose, by your cultural background, that political parties are essentian for a functional democracy.

In fact,, political parties are the opposite of real democracy. I'm not saying Cuba has it perfect, I'm saying we can do democracy much better and more democratically without corrupt authoritarian representation by "political parties". We can do democracy that is not only representative, but also direct and participatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #116
118. If a thought entered their heads, they'd probably believe they were sick!


Unfortunately, you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #110
120. Sustainable
All I can say to you: ignorance is bliss.

Ecologism and limits of growth were not hot topics in 19th century, but what Marx' theory actually predicts, is that global capitalism wii fall after it's become really global via imperialism, and thus Capitalism will fall after limits of growth have been met.

And when material growth turns negative, only way for civilization to survive is coopearation and sharing, equality, aka socialism.

It is a sad fact that US cannot liberate itself from the harmfull mythology of Americana, but is doomed to realize the Mad Max society, abrupt and sudden population drop, quite likely much worse than that in former Soviet Union.

All the best!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #109
119. Black market
Illegal drugs make between 10-25 per cent of US economy. Market forces of demand and supply are a fact that no society can deny. The problem is how to make them serve the common good.

Extrenest individualism, consumerism, materialism and idea of chemical happines (prozac nation) certaintly don't make people happy, but miserable. US is failed state on all levels. Cuba is less failed, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. One party? Kind of like America is now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. And we have a pro-democratic system where 9 SC justices decided...
...who our president would be in 2000? That doesn't sound very democratic to me. Perhaps I am missing something here?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Actually
I'd disagree with you on that. The essence of democracy is a power created by the people, for the people, with the principles of social equality. Which isn't in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Thats crap
Without social equality there can not be a true government of the people. I'm sure if we all think about that, we can understand why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Uhm, Marxism, huh?
Though Marxism is, by definition, democratic, to dismiss calls for social equality in a democratic system as Marxist is ridiculous. Social equality is as important as legal equality, because the law makers are the people who're in charge based on a flawed social system. Without a policy of social equality, the people you're voting for, who've been chosen for you, can not represent the people. Which is what democracy is. pick up a dictionary. Democracy can only exist in a system where equality spreads to all sectors of a society, because it's very principle is the choice of the people. And if some people have less choice, less voice, than others, it isn't democratic. And THAT is a social issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. its... right there in front of you
5 : the absence of hereditary or arbitrary class distinctions or privileges

1 a : government by the people - read what I said before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. What?!
Are you on drugs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. "like India used to do" You must be kidding. Aren't you?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0602_030602_untouchables.html


India's "Untouchables" Face Violence, Discrimination


Hillary Mayell
for National Geographic News

June 2, 2003
More than 160 million people in India are considered "Untouchable"—people tainted by their birth into a caste system that deems them impure, less than human.

Human rights abuses against these people, known as Dalits, are legion. A random sampling of headlines in mainstream Indian newspapers tells their story: "Dalit boy beaten to death for plucking flowers"; "Dalit tortured by cops for three days"; "Dalit 'witch' paraded naked in Bihar"; "Dalit killed in lock-up at Kurnool"; "7 Dalits burnt alive in caste clash"; "5 Dalits lynched in Haryana"; "Dalit woman gang-raped, paraded naked"; "Police egged on mob to lynch Dalits".

"Dalits are not allowed to drink from the same wells, attend the same temples, wear shoes in the presence of an upper caste, or drink from the same cups in tea stalls," said Smita Narula, a senior researcher with Human Rights Watch, and author of Broken People: Caste Violence Against India's "Untouchables." Human Rights Watch is a worldwide activist organization based in New York.

India's Untouchables are relegated to the lowest jobs, and live in constant fear of being publicly humiliated, paraded naked, beaten, and raped with impunity by upper-caste Hindus seeking to keep them in their place. Merely walking through an upper-caste neighborhood is a life-threatening offense.

Nearly 90 percent of all the poor Indians and 95 percent of all the illiterate Indians are Dalits, according to figures presented at the International Dalit Conference that took place May 16 to 18 in Vancouver, Canada.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. Er
Edited on Mon May-09-05 12:13 PM by GirlinContempt
Right. You DON'T have that in the U.S.
Interesting. I wasn't aware you'd done away with the class barriers that prevent people without millions of dollars from doing anything worthwhile in their political system. I wasn't aware that Bush & co. weren't awarded arbitrary privileges based on their heredity. My mistake. Class barriers don't exist in the US.

Capitalism isn't pro or anti democracy. Capitalism is pro-capital. Thats it. I'm not making a case against capitalism, though it makes its own case in the fact that it is pro-capital, and that tends to not be in the interests of the people.

A) Nothing in that definition states that it applies only to aristocrats.
B) Aristocrats don't exist only in a monarchy. A member of a ruling class or of the nobility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #60
68. Eh. Wrong.
You aren't paying attention to what I'm saying. At all. End the assumptions and we'll talk. At this point, I don't this this conversation should be continued, cause I'm going to tear out my hair. You're pulling stuff out of thin air, and it seems to be based on some McCarthy-esque blinder regarding social justice and the power of wealth. If you support capitalism you should realize the power of capital on all levels of society. You're taking this beyond what I was saying and trying to make it into some sort of Communistic ideal about money in general, which I may have, but is completely irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #47
98. Bush and Kerry
and "hereditary privileges".

You don't have that in US? LOL.

Capitalism is anti-democracy, it's system of plutocratic oligarchy, not democratic rule by equal citizens who have political control over productive means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
97. Social equality
is essential for democracy. Democracy, by definition, is not about some people being "more equal" than others. When rich people are "more equal", the system is plutocratic oligarchy, not democracy.

How many non-millionares are there in Congress, Senate and among the Presidential candidate in US? Not many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #97
104. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #104
128. US is not democracy
but oligarchic plutocracy, so it's bit thick that "moderate" supporter of plutocracy tries to teach what democracy means.

It means people power, period. I don't think even you are so naive to think that rule by rich people and capital itself, via best propaganda machine in the world, is rule by "we, the people".

Cuba is succesful, and democracy. Nordic countries that have been built by social democratic parties are also considered quite succesfull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
82. You are entirely wrong
http://www.gksoft.com/govt/en/cu.html
* Partido Comunista de Cuba (PCC) {Communist Party of Cuba}
* Partido Demócrata Cristiano de Cuba (PDC) {Christian Democratic Party of Cuba} - Oswaldo Paya's Catholic party
* Partido Solidaridad Democrática (PSD) {Democratic Solidarity Party}
* Partido Social Revolucionario Democrático Cubano {Cuban Social Revolutionary Democratic Party}
* Coordinadora Social Demócrata de Cuba (CSDC) {Social Democratic Coordination of Cuba}
* Unión Liberal Cubana {Cuban Liberal Union}



Plenty of info on this long thread,
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=6300&forum=DCForumID70







www.stopbolton.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
123. Again
Democracy don't mean rule by oligarchic, plutocratic and corrupt political parties, it means rule by the people, egalitarianism.

Partisanship is by no means essential to democracy, least of all definition of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
124. HAHAHA!
Edited on Tue May-10-05 08:33 PM by manic expression
WHAT AN IDIOTIC STATEMENT!

From another post in the SAME THREAD:

Some Political Parties of Cuba

* Partido Comunista de Cuba (PCC) {Communist Party of Cuba}
* Partido Demócrata Cristiano de Cuba (PDC) {Christian Democratic Party of Cuba} - Oswaldo Paya's Catholic party
* Partido Solidaridad Democrática (PSD) {Democratic Solidarity Party}
* Partido Social Revolucionario Democrático Cubano {Cuban Social Revolutionary Democratic Party}
* Coordinadora Social Demócrata de Cuba (CSDC) {Social Democratic Coordination of Cuba}
* Unión Liberal Cubana {Cuban Liberal Union}

(FROM Mika)

Oh no! Big Bad Castro doesn't allow any other parties! Even ignoring this, political parties are NOT ALLOWED TO PUT UP CANDIDATES (ON EDIT: INCLUDING THE COMMUNIST PARTY)!

WOW, YOU ARE HOPELESS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
32. You know
every time a government by the people forms, you get the fleeing bourgeoisie crying out that it isn't democratic, because they LOST.
And you get a campaign in the media that supports those people, because it's profitable, not to mention it feeds the party lines.
http://www.georgetown.edu/pdba/Parties/Resumen/Cuba/desc.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Y'know, I had never thought of it that way.
You have a point, but Cuba still isn't democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Tis the truth, tis
I'll accept that you don't think Cuba is democratic. Democracy is a vague and elusive concept any-who.

But, yeah, it's just like in Venezuela, the bourgeoisie rose up against the horrible Chavez, said he was a dictator, a satan..... aaaand organized a coup, put in someone who had not even the PRETENSE of election, and the guy threw out the constitution and everything the democratically elected government had done, and jailed hundreds of political leaders. And, when the majority of the people took to the streets to get their President back, the one they had elected and chosen, they were called thugs and bandits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Chavez is a great man.
So is Lula.

One of the benefits to having an incompetent idiot in charge of the United States is that Latin America has been able to retain their elected reformers without them getting killed.

I'm amazed that Chavez is still alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Cheers to that
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
58. I think castro is not as brutal as the current American administration.

After all, Castro did not invade a sovereign nation based on fabricated intel and outright lies. And Castro is not responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of sovereign citizens of that nation.

If Castro had done what America has done, we would have invaded and deposed him two years ago.

And Castro is NOT the most hated man in the world now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
77. OMG My first reaction also! Too Funny!
Edited on Mon May-09-05 08:18 PM by lonestarnot
Edit for so sad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Look out! It's a plot to spread West Nile Virus!!!
I know because John Bolton told me! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kindness and healing from government. What a novel idea.
As "Mr. Danger" and the fascist republicans cut nutrition programs for elderly folks to pay new prescription drug programs, a social democracy is cooperating with a socialist state in order to heal poor people with debilitating eye diseases.

Ya gotta ask yerself "What would Jesus do"?;-)

Chavez is looking like a pretty good guy so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. when considering someones morality just remember
castro sent doctors to haiti. bush sent death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
57. Oops! Guess I missed where you criticized Bush....
Or any Republican. You don't like Kucinich, though--although you offered no details.

The 1994 intervention was to restore a popularly-elected president to office. The 2004 intervention was to help out rebels that "we" supported. "Democracy" is only recommended for some countries.

Haitians make such good sweat-shop employees!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #66
93. The people in Ohio elected him to Congress because his decision--
--to refuse to sell public power turned out to be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #93
105. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #66
94. More Hatians than ever are trying to leave..
.. but the US has formed a perimeter around the coast to intercept and return them to the US assisted henchmen & squalor.

Many have made it to Cuba though, and remain there. The Cuban government has promised not to return them to Haiti until their elected government is returned.







www.stopbolton.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #94
106. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. 1994 we re-established an elected head of state with UN approval.
2004 we kidnapped the elected leader and established a brutal military junta.

So yes, there is a HUGE difference between the invasions of '94 and '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. a HUGE difference
1994 was about putting back a government that was elected by the people.

2004 was about greed, corruption and giving back the country to the elite.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. How about not arming the old Duvalierist assholes in the 1st place. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. Are you talking about the rebels that the USA armed by any chance?
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=436352005

US admits 2,600 weapons sent to Haiti

REED LINDSAY
IN PORT-AU-PRINCE


THE US government gave more than 2,600 weapons to bolster Haiti’s controversial police force last year despite allegations of human rights abuses and a more than 13-year-old arms embargo, officials at the State Department and US Embassy said.

The officials rejected allegations of a massive $7m shipment of arms and ammunition to Haiti in 2004, but conceded that the US had given a smaller amount of arms to the Haitian government in the form of bilateral assistance. An official at the State Department added that the US government was considering a request by the Haitian government to approve the sale of an additional $1.9m in weapons this year.

A report issued earlier this month by the Small Arms Survey, a Geneva-based organisation financed by the Swiss government, states that 5,435 military-style weapons, 4,433 handguns and some one million assorted rounds of ammunition, valued at $6.95m, allegedly entered Haiti from the United States in 2004 for use by the Haitian national police.

US officials called the report "false", but admitted that the US government transferred 2,657 weapons to Haiti last year, including more than 1,900 .38 calibre revolvers, nearly 500 9mm pistols, eight submachine-guns and 13 M-14 rifles for use by the Haitian police force.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #53
63. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #63
75. The police who weren't rebels were controlled by Aristide n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
62. Apparently you haven't been keeping up. Have ya'. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
100. Blah
Given free democratic choice, Haiti would go the Cuban way in a minute, which is the fastest and only way out of their misery, that is all you need to understand re US policy on Haiti.

When Aristide made gestures of becoming more independent and less obedient to IMF and considered applying Cuban social programs in education and health care, first Haiti was put under economic sanctions, and then US kicked Aristide out. Only way to keep Haiti allying with Cuba is murderous colonialism to keep the blacks in slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Not have encouraged the civil war in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. DU'ers have spent hundreds, if not thousands of hours watching
the tragic, villianous actions from George Bush concerning Haiti. WE all did our part in trying to get informed. It's a real low note hearing you didn't take the time to learn something about it then, yourself.

You have the entire internet to explore for the tons of articles which will get you up to date on the subject.

DU'ers don't believe the population wanted to overthrow the very President they loved then, and continue to love.

Sorry I won't be answering until late tonight. I've got to be gone until much later. I'm interested in seeing how you will do with some people who definitely know what has been happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
56. Why don't YOU provide some information?
There's lots out there....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
99. Not so big
Clinton put democratic governement back in Haiti only after they promised to be good obedient boys to IMF. Which is not democratic, but plutocratic and imperialistic. As Clinton was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
49. Are you not aware there are a lot of Haitians who have sought refuge
in Cuba? Americans who have taken the time to read or keep research or keep their ears open have known about this for years.

There are hundreds of thousands of Haitians living in Cuba currently.

A couple of years ago, Haiti's most beloved singer, Martha Jean-Claude died in Cuba after fleeing political trouble from the Duvalier government. She was greatly celebrated throughout the Caribbean.

Many DU'ers know that Cuba has accepted refugees throughout, even though Bush sent a group of American ships to Haiti to turn back everyone desperately trying to reach America after the contrived "rebellion" resulting in the removal of the very President Bill Clinton had returned to office, following the coup arranged by the elder Bush which removed him from his elected position originally.

There's a famous group of Haitian singers who are known world-wide (except the U.S., of course) who are second generation Haitians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. The US IS a ONE PARTY SYSTEM
Name one non-capitalist President.
The rest is window dressing for the wage slaves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Woohoo!
Edited on Mon May-09-05 01:10 PM by GirlinContempt
thanks for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. Luv that picture - keep it posted!
Great reminder and wonderful memo point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #65
126. That is a great pic. Where did you get that ?
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Don't you ever take time to think?
I'm waiting to go to a doctor's appointment, or I'd start posting the information which has already been discussed in depth here, over and over and over since that "intervention."

You are apparently overlooking the conspicuously familiar habit of our Republican Presidents to destabilize countries by heavy use of funds through any number of organizations.

Here's a quick one:

Wednesday, April 7th, 2004
Witnesses: U.S. Special Forces Trained and Armed Haitian Anti-Aristide Paramilitaries in D.R.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/07/1527256&mode=thread&tid=25


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


US Trained and Suppled Haitian Paramilitaries in Dominican Republic

Amy Goodman (AG): Dr. Luis Barrios. You were looking at who the rebel forces were and where they came from?

Dr. Luis Barrios (LB): Yes. We were running interviews in the Dominican Republic trying to get the information about what was going on in the Dominican Republic for the last two years. Preliminary reports indicate that for the last two years at least, Haitian rebels were living in the Dominican Republic. They were training in military settings that belong to the Dominican government. They also trained in San Cristobar. They were receiving technical training every month through the so-called International Republican Institute at the Santo Domingo Hotel every month. That was also the day for payment.
(snip)

http://www.afsc.org/pwork/0405/040514.htm


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Operation Enduring Sweatshop – Another Bush Brings Hell to Haiti
by Chris Floyd
10 March 2004

This week, the Bush administration added another violent "regime change" notch to its gunbelt, toppling the democratically elected president of Haiti and replacing him with an unelected gang of convicted killers, death squad leaders, militarists, narcoterrorists, CIA operatives, hereditary elitists and corporate predators – a bit like Team Bush itself, in other words.

Although the Haiti coup was widely portrayed as an irresistible upsurge of popular discontent, it was of course the result of years of hard work by Bush's dedicated corrupters of democracy, as William Bowles of Information Clearinghouse reports. Bushist bagmen funded the political opposition to President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, smuggled guns to exiled Haitian warlords, and carried out a relentless strangulation of the county, cutting off long-promised financial and structural aid to one of the poorest nations on earth until food prices were soaring, unemployment spiked to 70 percent, and the broken-backed government lost control of society to armed gangs of criminals, fanatics and the merely desperate.
(snip)

http://www.doublestandards.org/floyd5.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


As I said, I'm on my way out, and I'm going to be interested in reading a lot of the excellent sources you're probably going to provide, rather than uninformed claims, later.

I'll be happy to post any number of helpful articles at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #67
76. I'd like them
just for bookmarking purposes, if you have them handy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #61
101. The tragedy of Haiti
Is US support for the Duvaliers and all other interventions, including 94 and 04. The tragedy of Haiti is living too close to US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
79. Haitians do flee to Cuba
Cuba doesn't send them back because they have a legitimate asylum claim.. the US assisted in the overthrow of their elected government.

The US deports them back to a murderous unelected government forthwith.






www.stopbolton.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
121. how do you know how many Haitians have emigrated to Cuba?
You are implying that "not that many" do, that more come to the U.S. Do you have any data to support that? For all anybody knows, Haitians might be going to Cuba in droves. The corporate media couldn't care less, so we Americans will hardly hear about it if at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
64. Nominated-Need One More n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
81. So Cuba is BAD because it has ...
Edited on Mon May-09-05 09:51 PM by bvar22
...one less political Party than the US (and this is arguable).

Didn't Thomas Jefferson and several of the founding fathers warn AGAINST the corrupting influence of Political Parties?
I believe it was Jefferson who wanted NO political Parties.

Anyway, good on Chavez AND Castro for providing HealthCare for those who need it. They are working together to make the World a better place.

If I lived in Cuba, I would have HealthCare.

Doesn't someone have to be reasonably HEALTHY to care about who belongs to which Party and How many are there?
When I have an abscessed tooth, I could give a shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. Cuba has many political parties
One thing though..

http://www.poptel.org.uk/cuba-solidarity/democracy.htm
Electoral candidates are not chosen by small committees of political parties. No political party, including the Communist Party, is permitted to nominate or campaign for any given candidates.



Citizens diriectly propose candidates from among those on the voter rolls (in other words.. any citizen who has the right to vote has the right and chance to be nominated and elected).

I've been to Cuba and have witnessed the entire election process.


Really, DUers who haven't been there (and are making wild claims about Cuba this and Cuba that) should read..

Democracy in Cuba and the 1997-98 Elections
Arnold August
1999
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0968508405/qid=1053879619/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-8821757-1670550?v=glance&s=books


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. PINKO ALERT
Quick! Alert the media, we have a state of POLKADOT ALERT on the charts here, people.

Because, healthcare is for the rich. Leave the poor to die, they're in the way as it is. Less people to step over on my way to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. Cubans have representational government
Before the 1959 revolution

  • 75% of rural dwellings were huts made from palm trees.
  • More than 50% had no toilets of any kind.
  • 85% had no inside running water.
  • 91% had no electricity.
  • There was only 1 doctor per 2,000 people in rural areas.
  • More than one-third of the rural population had intestinal parasites.
  • Only 4% of Cuban peasants ate meat regularly; only 1% ate fish, less than 2% eggs, 3% bread, 11% milk; none ate green vegetables.
  • The average annual income among peasants was $91 (1956), less than 1/3 of the national income per person.
  • 45% of the rural population was illiterate; 44% had never attended a school.
  • 25% of the labor force was chronically unemployed.
  • 1 million people were illiterate ( in a population of about 5.5 million).
  • 27% of urban children, not to speak of 61% of rural children, were not attending school.
  • Racial discrimination was widespread.
  • The public school system had deteriorated badly.
  • Corruption was endemic; anyone could be bought, from a Supreme Court judge to a cop.
  • Police brutality and torture were common.

    ___



    After the 1959 revolution


    “It is in some sense almost an anti-model,” according to Eric Swanson, the programme manager for the Bank’s Development Data Group, which compiled the WDI, a tome of almost 400 pages covering scores of economic, social, and environmental indicators.

    Indeed, Cuba is living proof in many ways that the Bank’s dictum that economic growth is a pre-condition for improving the lives of the poor is over-stated, if not, downright wrong.

    -

    It has reduced its infant mortality rate from 11 per 1,000 births in 1990 to seven in 1999, which places it firmly in the ranks of the western industrialised nations. It now stands at six, according to Jo Ritzen, the Bank’s Vice President for Development Policy, who visited Cuba privately several months ago to see for himself.

    By comparison, the infant mortality rate for Argentina stood at 18 in 1999;

    Chile’s was down to ten; and Costa Rica, at 12. For the entire Latin American and Caribbean region as a whole, the average was 30 in 1999.

    Similarly, the mortality rate for children under the age of five in Cuba has fallen from 13 to eight per thousand over the decade. That figure is 50% lower than the rate in Chile, the Latin American country closest to Cuba’s achievement. For the region as a whole, the average was 38 in 1999.

    “Six for every 1,000 in infant mortality - the same level as Spain - is just unbelievable,” according to Ritzen, a former education minister in the Netherlands. “You observe it, and so you see that Cuba has done exceedingly well in the human development area.”

    Indeed, in Ritzen’s own field, the figures tell much the same story. Net primary enrolment for both girls and boys reached 100% in 1997, up from 92% in 1990. That was as high as most developed nations - higher even than the US rate and well above 80-90% rates achieved by the most advanced Latin American countries.

    “Even in education performance, Cuba’s is very much in tune with the developed world, and much higher than schools in, say, Argentina, Brazil, or Chile.”

    It is no wonder, in some ways. Public spending on education in Cuba amounts to about 6.7% of gross national income, twice the proportion in other Latin American and Caribbean countries and even Singapore.

    There were 12 primary school pupils for every Cuban teacher in 1997, a ratio that ranked with Sweden, rather than any other developing country. The Latin American and East Asian average was twice as high at 25 to one.

    The average youth (age 15-24) illiteracy rate in Latin America and the Caribbean stands at 7%. In Cuba, the rate is zero. In Latin America, where the average is 7%, only Uruguay approaches that achievement, with one percent youth illiteracy.

    “Cuba managed to reduce illiteracy from 40% to zero within ten years,” said Ritzen. “If Cuba shows that it is possible, it shifts the burden of proof to those who say it’s not possible.”

    Similarly, Cuba devoted 9.1% of its gross domestic product (GDP) during the 1990s to health care, roughly equivalent to Canada’s rate. Its ratio of 5.3 doctors per 1,000 people was the highest in the world.

    The question that these statistics pose, of course, is whether the Cuban experience can be replicated. The answer given here is probably not.

    “What does it, is the incredible dedication,” according to Wayne Smith, who was head of the US Interests Section in Havana in the late 1970s and early 1980s and has travelled to the island many times since.



    No one can say with any credibility that universal education and universal health care is forced on Cubans. Castro didn't give it to them. They worked hard to create these thingd that they felt were essential for any progressive system.

    Cubans wanted universal health care for all Cubans, and they have it. They pushed for government that represented their ideals, and organized and formed infrastructure that enabled Cubans to do so. Cubans wanted universal education for all Cubans, and they have it. They pushed for government that represented their ideals, organized and formed infrastructure that enabled Cubans to do so, and they have it. Cubans want to assist the world's poor with doctors and educators, instead of gun ship diplomacy.. and that is what they have done WITH their government, not at odds with their government.

    Can Americans make this claim about their own country? I'm afraid not.


    Cubans want normalization between the US and Cuba, and they have thrown their doors open to us, but, it is our US government that prevents what the majority of Americans want their government to do - normalize relations. Worse yet, the US government forbids and has criminalized travel to Cuba by Americans - something that Cuba hasn't done.





    www.stopbolton.org



  • Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:18 PM
    Response to Reply #87
    88. Uh, read through the
    rest of my replies. I think you'll get a better picture of what I was doing with that.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:24 PM
    Response to Reply #88
    89. I'm catching up.
    :thumbsup:

    I was too busy today to follow this thread.

    Its an eye opener. :crazy:


    I find it interesting that many DUers seem so sure of what is going on in Cuba NOW, but have never been there. Of course Americans are a special case, it is difficult to get there legally, as our US government forbids regular travel to Cuba. Doesn't it kinda make some wonder why? What is there that the US gov doesn't want Americans to see?






    www.stopbolton.org




    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:41 PM
    Response to Reply #89
    90. I find it
    interesting how so many USians are quick to call bullshit in the media when it pertains to their own politics, but seem to overlook it in others.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:51 PM
    Response to Reply #90
    91. Yes indeed.
    The press ringer Jeff Gannon story was big here at DU, as was Armstrong Williams story, but the US/BushCrimeInc bought_and_paid_for "independent journalists" in Cuba speak only truth. :crazy:

    Same goes with Oswaldo Paya's Partido Democrata Cristiano de Cuba (PDC).







    www.stopbolton.org



    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:02 PM
    Response to Reply #91
    92. Shh!
    Locking up people who're paid to overthrow you and destabilize your country is a stifling of free speech. Just read the paper. Cause its GOTTA be true.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:19 PM
    Response to Original message
    113. Thumbs up to them
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 04:34 AM
    Response to Original message
    127. Mika, I found an article which should shine some light on Cuban wages
    It was written by Julián Gutiérrez, of whom I've known for years, from a distance. He's a terrific guy, and has traveled a lot. He's got so many American and Canadian friends among his acquaintances.
    Cuba: Cost of Living

    Written by Julián Gutiérrez

    Cindy What are the wages in Cuba? What is the cost of living? These are topics that are often used by our enemies to attack us. They even confuse many friends and even Cubans that live in Cuba, who repeat without thinking that their wage is between $10 and $20 USD.
    Of course the topic is very complex and I do not seek to exhaust everything that one could say about it. I would like you to analyze what I explain here and let's establish an exchange where you give your perspectives and bring up the doubts that you still have.


    BASIC CONSIDERATIONS
    First I want to establish some economic concepts. To be able to analyze the financial situation of any person, family and even country, We cannot just take into consideration the nominal value of the capital that they possess, but also the purchasing power of that capital. Applying this concept to a person, it means that the important thing is not the nominal value of that person's capital (wage), but rather the purchasing power that this capital has. An example of this can be seen in the following: A person that lives in New York or in Tokyo, Japan (two of the most expensive cities in the world), if he receives a monthly wage of $1500.00 USD he could not live; but if he lived in La Paz, Bolivia or Port-au-Prince, Haiti he would have an ample situation. That is to say that the $1500.00 USD would have a bigger purchasing power in La Paz or Port-au-Prince that in New York or Tokyo.

    What will these workers' wages buy?

    The second question that I want to look at is: What are the expenses that most impact the wages of the people in the countries that We are comparing? : 1. -Housing. - That covers in most cases around half of the wages. 2. - Food. 3. - Education. 4. - Public health. 5. - Services. - Transportation, telephone, electricity, water, gas, funeral expenses, etc. 6. - Social Activities. - Recreation, culture, sports, etc. 7. - Taxes.
    If we agree on these concepts, we can go on to analyze the purchasing power of the Cuban peso, that is to say, of the wage of any Cuban.
    Let us consider that the main necessities of the Cubans are the same ones that we set down previously. Then let's analyze what a Cuban or a Cuban family spends for each of them.

    How much will it cost to educate these kids?

    Before beginning the analysis of each concept I want to explain a situation that exists in Cuba that is very different from other countries of the Third World and even of the First World (industrialized countries). In Cuba, in families, all the people of working age usually work and all the pensioners receive a pension. For this reason, in each household there are several incomes. In my house, for example, live seven people: me, my wife, my daughter and son-in-law (ages 29 & 30), their two children (ages 4 years and one month) and my son (age 27): so five of us are of working age and are working and receiving wages so the household has five incomes.
    (snip)
    http://hometown.aol.com/merengue123/cubaeng2.html

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    He used to post at CNN. He has seen wave after wave of Miami right-wing loons running exactly the same disinformation we saw on this thread. He's used to it.

    Pity.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 07:58 AM
    Response to Reply #127
    129. Thanks Judi. Certainly refreshing..
    .. to hear from Julian. It gets tiring beating back the red baiting posters who have never set foot on the island who spew accusations with nary a thought or serious question as to how Cuba has progressed as far as it has. It seems that the Cubaphobes think that Castro is one helluva guy to do it all singlehandedly. That's why I like Julian's writings.. he is part of what makes Cuba progressive and gives credit where credit is due - the Cuban people.










    www.stopbolton.org
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 05:45 PM
    Response to Reply #129
    130. Kick!
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:33 AM
    Response to Original message
    Advertisements [?]
     Top

    Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

    Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
    Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


    Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

    Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

    About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

    Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

    © 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC