Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice to Withhold Bolton NSA Transcripts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:36 PM
Original message
Rice to Withhold Bolton NSA Transcripts
Hmmm. . .What are they so afraid of?

The State Department is refusing to make public internal documents sought by Senate Democrats in their attempt to seek more information about repeated clashes between John R. Bolton and American intelligence agencies over Syria, administration officials say.

In rejecting the request, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said that the information involves "internal deliberations" and their disclosure could have a chilling effect on debates within the administration.

The decision was spelled out in a letter that Ms. Rice sent Friday to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which is evaluating the administration's nomination of Mr. Bolton to be the United States ambassador to the United Nations. Republicans on the panel had declined to endorse the Democratic request, but the State Department had not previously made its position clear.

The decision by Ms. Rice prompted a sharp new protest from Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, the top Democrat on the panel, who described the move as a lack of cooperation by the administration into the panel's examination of Mr. Bolton.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/09/politics/09bolton.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Makes me wonder
what they are trying to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. Where as Powell clearly states he isn't qualified for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. They want nothing to be released to the American public
The sheeple are more easily controlled that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dems to withhold Bolton confirmation
Fine, you don't want to play nice? There's plenty to convict him on without those documents. Do not pass Senate, do not collect a confirmation, do not let the door hit your ass on the way OUT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jandar Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe,
If the refusal servers to convince a couple republican committee members to vote against his conformation. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Was about to post the same thing -- withholding this information...
SHOULD raise some suspicions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. just raise suspicions?
how about raising a contempt of Congress citation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Trying to be realistic re. "moderate" Repubs who might vote no...
on Bolton. How I wish this WOULD result in contempt of Congress, as you suggest quite rightly it should --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
44. You are correct "it should" but knowing our press, it won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. We could encourage them
Drop a couple of polite notes to the Republicans here:

http://foreign.senate.gov/about.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. No advising, just CONSENT
Edited on Mon May-09-05 12:03 AM by PurityOfEssence
What a high-handed bunch of thugs.

We'll give you what we want you to have and you'll give us what we want; it's not that hard to understand, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't Biden demand DOS cooperation
when he agreed not to hold the vote at the last hearing. Didn't Luger assure Biden he'd get cooperation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockedthevoteinMA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. Yes, and Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. And the compromising fair and reasonable dems
get kicked in the balls every time and then come back for more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. A government of the people, for the people and by the people...
Edited on Mon May-09-05 12:39 AM by Miss Chybil
Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. It all depends on how you define "people." Aren't members
of the Bush* Crime Family "people," too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. There are "people" and there are "THE people." We are THE people.
They are the aristocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
41. BFEE are monsters, not people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. An Under Secretary sees them

but not US Senators!!

Amazing.

Jacob Matthan
Oulu, Finland
http://jmpolitics.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Point of order
Is the National Security Adviser an Under Secretary to the Secretary of State? Hasn't anyone told her of her new job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's not the first time they've used this excuse, is it?
I'll be dipped if I can call the other occasion to mind right now, but I know it's out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrRang Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. How can it have a chilling effect . . .
How can anything have a "chilling effect on debate" with these bozos? Bush has gotten rid of anybody who disagrees with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hey, Cheney got away with hiding the Energy meetings - they figure
they can just wait it out and the truth will stay buried. So disgusting, that easy assumption that the bullies will ALWAYS have their way.

Condi has a LOT to hide:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. What!!!????!!!!
In rejecting the request, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said that the information involves "internal deliberations" and their disclosure could have a chilling effect on debates within the administration.

'chilling effect on debates within the administration'

are there some who are fed-up or scared of being PURGED?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I think Condi needs a subpoena to come before Congress
and tell them precisely what the Hell she meant by "internal deliberations." This is a cover-up to salvage Bolton's sorry ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. "within the administration"
Yeah, all FOUR of them.....

sheesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. can anybody chargeher with OBSTRUCTION of ... or IMPEDING the SENATE to do
Edited on Mon May-09-05 02:21 AM by flordehinojos
its job.

just now it dawned on me that condoasses' smile is just as fake as that of laura. bush must have a fetish for fake smiles. oh,yes!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. They're trying to keep the OSP under wraps
Bolton has already battled allegations of exaggerating intelligence on Cuba's alleged biological weapons program but if they dig in the right places they'll discover his role in the "Office of Special Plans" and how he helped create the "faulty intelligence" leading to the Iraq war.

The Office of Special Plans (OSP) was a secret group of analysts and policy advisors with no status in the intelligence community. Nevertheless they reported directly to the White House and National Security office with cherry-picked intelligence from questionable sources to support the case for invading Iraq. The OSP circumvented formal, well-established oversight procedures, ignored intelligence that didn't further their agenda, expanded the intelligence on weapons beyond what was justified and over-emphasized the national security risk. They became more influential than the C.I.A. or the Defense Intelligence Agency who didn't even know the ultra-secret OSP existed for at least a year.

Because they were based in the Pentagon, it was assumed that the OSP was an intelligence-gathering agency that was second-guessing the C.I.A. but in actuality it was the White House Military Marketing Machine charged with the task of writing the PNAC's "Get Saddam" sales pitch for the public. Shading and bending reality to suit their own purpose, it wasn't important for the OSP's stories about Saddam to be factual, only that the average American believed them to be - in true Hollywood fashion.



Full chronology included in sig line link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Yes indeedy.
They can't have the OSP popping up at the same time as the memo. They are actually having to play whack-a-mole here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. See also this complementary thread - interesting!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3622343#3622371
Thread title: "White House Defies Biden and Lugar on Bolton Intercepts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. We, the People, to withold Rice toilet paper.
Tit for tat, Condi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. It Must Be A Smoking Gun - Otherwise Why The Fear
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. 'ts all the proof I need that Bolton was up to his hiney
In the great intell massage refered to in the Bush/Blair memo. My guess is that there are smoking guns all through that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. Now Joe, stick with your gun and get this nomination DEAD
Obviously they aren't co-operating; therefore, this guy's nomination should be dead in the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. * in Russia promoting transparency in government - HA!
Really though; it's not even funny anymore. Especially when this kind of shit is pulled - ever heard of a sharpie Condi? We have a right to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. the argument is very similar to the one Cheney used to keep his meetings
secret (regarding the energy meetings--and while these were 'extertal' industry types--and these are internal-the logic is the same--the 'chilling effect")

....In rejecting the request, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said that the information involves "internal deliberations" and their disclosure could have a chilling effect on debates within the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
29. The Cheney excuse...'We can't open that to scrutiny, it may force future
discussions to be honest'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. good one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. That's exactly right, it's the same argument
Remember, Cheney argued that if the energy deliberations weren't secret, then he couldn't get "unvarnished truth" from others.

Of course, no one ever calls them on this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
31. This part had me rolling on the floor laughing:
"chilling effect on debates within the administration."

Too funny, the irony, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
38. If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about
That is the standard Repub line about illegal searches and siezures and all Furth Amendment arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
39. JOE BIDEN'S EMAIL - tell him to STAY STRONG ON THIS
The next meeting on this isn't until Thursday at 10am so we have plenty of time to tell Joe to hold his ground.

senator@biden.senate.gov

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. wouldn't hurt 2 let
Reid know the dems need 2 stand firm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. Thanks for making that easy!
Perhaps a letter/email thread devoted to this is in order:shrug:


Who else besides Kerry is on the committe? We should write to them as well;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Here's a link to the list of all members - each with their own link
Edited on Mon May-09-05 11:22 AM by cyberpj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Thank you!
cyberpj, :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dandrhesse Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
42. She should be jailed for obstruction of justice. Don't Congressional Comm
have the legal power to supoena documents? If not then they need to go another route but that is flat out wrong and IMO criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
48. This admin withholding information? I'm shocked, I tell you tell,
simple shocked...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
49. What internal debates?
Your ass starts debating the Nazi crew, you wind up on the street, pronto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC