Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP,pg1: NASA Chief Speeds Plan For (shuttle replacement) Spacecraft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 10:55 PM
Original message
WP,pg1: NASA Chief Speeds Plan For (shuttle replacement) Spacecraft
NASA Chief Speeds Plan For Spacecraft
Griffin Wants to Launch Shuttle Replacement by 2010

By Guy Gugliotta
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 9, 2005; Page A01


Less than a month after taking the job, NASA Administrator Michael D. Griffin is pushing an ambitious but risky plan to shave four years off the timetable for building a next-generation spaceship to replace the space shuttle, and wants to launch it with a crew by the end of 2010.

The shuttle has not flown since the Columbia tragedy in February 2003, and even after safety modifications are completed and flights resume, the orbiter will not be able to get beyond "low Earth orbit" and will become obsolete as soon as construction of the international space station is completed in 2010.

NASA has planned for more than a year to build a new workhorse spacecraft to carry out President Bush's long-term vision for space exploration, aimed at returning humans to the moon by 2020 and eventually sending them to Mars, but the initial strategy called for completion of the new spaceship by 2014. That would leave the United States without its own access to space for four years....

***

Griffin, as have many members of Congress, has frequently criticized a strategy that would cede U.S. preeminence in human space travel, and at his confirmation hearing last month he advocated building the new spacecraft faster to shrink the four-year gap or eliminate it altogether....

***

Several sources said Griffin's initiative has put him at odds with retired Navy Rear Adm. Craig E. Steidle, the principal architect of the original plan....The plan's clarity and Steidle's procurement expertise won plaudits from industry, but discontent has grown among some scientists and lawmakers who fret that storied NASA programs -- especially in earth science and aeronautics -- are being cut to fund the new initiative....


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/08/AR2005050800834.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. The whole shuttle concept is pointless and expensive
Edited on Mon May-09-05 12:11 AM by wuushew
basically it is an over manned expensive PR machine that sucks down money like their is no tomorrow.

In Robert Zubrin's 1996 book The Case for Mars, he estimated that a new heavy lift vehicle in the 120-140 ton LEO capability could be developed for a few billion dollars and used to pioneer ongoing missions to Mars. These missions would accomplish real science unlike the shuttle and Bush's pointless lunar fantasies.

Nothing new or pioneering would be necessary for this task as the launch vehicle could for all practical purposes be identical to the 1960's era Saturn V or the current Russian Energia booster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC