|
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 04:10 PM by Maat
Out here in SoCal, they have elected not to mention the adoption at all if the article is not specifically about adoption. And I agree with that.
Hanai - thanks, that concept is interesting.
When I was a social worker, I noticed a great deal of inequity as to when someone was charged with the felony and when they weren't. In the vast majority of cases, informal family maintenance (intervention/monitoring) was quite sufficient to correct the behavior.
Many times, whether or not there is a criminal charge depends on the severity of the injuries, the likelihood of the parents being able to avail themselves of parenting education, how many incidents there have been, and whether or not the parent regrets the incident.
Many times, even if there is a criminal charge, the penalty involves parenting class, and working with social services.
It was my experience that the vast majority of cases involved an isolated incident, the injuries were relatively minor (welts on the back), and in conjunction with parenting education, we never saw it happen again (even in view of monthly contact by the Department with the child for several months).
So, I think I need to know more about this case. But the fact that the police chose to charge her with a felony (even if I knew no other facts) does not bode well (because most police officers are very reluctant to go that far unless the situation was/is dire).
On edit: I calmly reread the article. She's already been convicted; a jury heard the evidence. It was apparently established beyond a reasonable doubt that she threw scalding water at the kid (wow, what a rage that must have been!). It was a 'brutal beating.' Sad, what a tragedy. Now, the child will suffer several times over - Child will bear physical and mental scars from the torture/injuries; Child will also suffer from being taken from the mother Child has known for the majority of his life; Child will forever wonder how circumstances could have been different. What a tragedy!
|