Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada may retaliate against new U.S. border rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:25 PM
Original message
Canada may retaliate against new U.S. border rules
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/04/05/passports050405.html

CBC News

WASHINGTON - In response to a new rule requiring most Canadians to carry passports for entry into the U.S., Public Security Minister Anne McLellan said Americans may also have to carry the document to enter Canada.

"Our system has really always worked on the basis of reciprocity," McLellan said outside the House of Commons.

"And therefore we will review our requirements for American citizens and we're going to do that in collaboration with the United States."

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Why? It's punishment for imposing a tariff on the US...do you think it's
a good idea to estrange yourself from friends and neighbors? We are making enemies far faster than we can kill them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
44. Bingo!
It is a terrible idea because it is another indication of how far we have fallen out of favor with the world community. When even our closest neighbor (some could even call them a sibling) starts to get cold, then we have truly become a pariah.

Thanks Bush! You f***ing dimwit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. no problemo
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 09:26 PM by xray s
I have my passport. If you don't have one, I strongly suggest you get one as soon as possible, especially if you are of draft age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll definitely have to visit
this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Passports are good things to have.
I keep mine handy -- just in case I decide to get the hell out of here, fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
52. yes it is but the greater issue here is just how far your government
is going to alienate it closest ally. This is just one more way to shit on your neighbour with a little fuck you thrown in for good measure. It's really sad how far this administration has gone to sever this "friendship" :( Assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
56. and if you have it with you, no one can doubt your citizenship
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 02:42 PM by SoCalDem
at a polling place on election day:)

I have often thought that a better way to help poor people register without the hassle would be to just get them all passports.. It would probably be cheaper than all the lawsuits after the fact:) and it would be irrefutable identification:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Derek Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've been using mine to cross the border for a few years now. I
don't see a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Only because you aren't looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. American Visits To Canada, Mexico To Require Passports
American Visits To Canada, Mexico To Require Passports
New Rules Phased In By Jan.1, 2008

POSTED: 9:49 am PDT April 5, 2005

WASHINGTON -- Americans will need passports to re-enter the United States from Canada, Mexico, Panama and Bermuda by 2008, part of a tightening of U.S. border controls in an era of terrorist threat, three administration officials said Tuesday.

Similarly, Canadians will also have to present a passport to enter the United States, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Canadians have been the only foreigners allowed to enter the United States with just a driver's license.

An announcement, expected Tuesday at the State Department, will specify that a passport or another valid travel document will have to be shown by U.S. citizens, the officials said.

Until now, Americans returning home from Canada have needed only to show a driver's license or other government-issued photo identification card.

(more)
http://www.kirotv.com/travelgetaways/4348277/detail.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. As a resident of a border state...
I think this kind of sucks. Metro Detroiters go back and forth to Windsor, Ontario, as if it were in the States - it's like a suburb. I, too, carry my passport when I cross the border just because it's easier and speedier, but the vast majority of people don't own passports. I do wonder how this will impact transborder leisure trips.
Sometimes I get the feeling that Bush & Co. would prefer that Americans not travel beyond their borders, expand their minds and realize there are perhaps better ways of doing things.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is one problem
I see though. Passports can be stolen. It's actually smarter IMO to use birth certficates, voter registration cards, in conjuction with drivers licenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. passports for entry into foriegn countries?
oh my god, what will they do next? no, wait, isn't that what passports are for? its not as if the citizens are being required to obtain visas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Understood, but...
When you're in Europe, traveling from EU country to EU country, passports are not required. I don't know why we need the change the current U.S.-Canada arrangement. The 9/11 hijackers, if I remember correctly, arrived from Germany and would've needed to present a passport, if the prevention of a terrorist attack is the aim of this law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. i'm not saying its right or wrong to change the rules, however
the difference is that the EU countries have agreed among themselves not to require passports as a way of qualifying for membership in the EU. i presume any country could begin requiring passports, but then they would loose the benefits of membership. the US and Canada are not in any similar kind of union with each other (unless i'm mistaken, and please correct me, but NAFTA nor any other treaty we have is silent on the issue), regardless of how open the boarder is and how many times people might jokingly refer to canada as the 51st state.

and i'm also not saying that showing passports will, necessarily, do anything to protect against terrorism - much in the way drivers licenses didn't do anything to prevent the hijackers from boarding the plane. my only point is that enforcing, or implementing anew, the rule doesn't seem to be an unreasonable demand for international travel.

(after all, didn't you see canadian bacon? our northern neighbors are just plain loco... :bounce:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
37. EU countries can require passports
For instance, during the Fifa World Cup, Germany will temporarily opt-out of the Schengen treaty.

My issue with the Bush administration's continuous sniping at the Visa-Waiver program (and the Passport-Waiver one), is that stopping it will hurt tourism and business on both sides of the big pond, without doing anything to enhance security (remember: the terrorists had valid, genuine visa. Not fakes and not limited to 90 days). Much the same can be said about closing down the Canadian border.
The legality is without question, that doesn't make it wise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yeah, just imagine that
After all, the EU countries all require passports to travel back and forth among member nations...

Oh, wait a minute, they don't anymore. Fancy that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. what your analogy misses is that
the countries of the EU made the removal of the passport requirement a condition of membership to the EU; Canada and the US don't have a similar agreement (unless there is one in which case please correct me). in addition, while travel within the EU doesn't require showing passports when crossing between individual countries, a passport is required for entry into the EU itself, even for citizens of EU nations. in that respect, travel within the EU is more similar to traveling between states within the US than it is of traveling between the US and Canada.

and as i said in my other post, i'm not saying its right or wrong, i'm merely pointing out that a passport is normally required for people to visit the US and there hasn't been a call to require visas, so it doesn't seem to be an unreasonable requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Speaking as one who has benefitted from the no-passport system,
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 11:10 PM by Art_from_Ark
I think this is a foolish move on America's part. The no-passport system has been around for as long as I can remember being interested in traveling to Canada (early '70s), and it has brought many benefits to both Canada and the US. I much prefer to maintain the spirit of the Peace Arch in Blaine/White Rock, which proclaims that we (Americans and Canadians) are "Children of a Common Mother" and that the symbolic gates at the Peace Arch should never be closed. To me, this is a step (perhaps small, perhaps not) toward closing those gates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. When I was a small boy, my folks would take me and sibs
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 12:43 AM by kurtyboy
across the border at Blaine/White Rock often, to visit family. Mom was Canadian, Dad was American, and Dad (a history schoolteacher) pointed to the Peace Arch and explained what it meant---Our two nations share more than we do not, and we've been at peace across this world's-longest-frontier for more years than any other nation-pair on Earth.

Our two nations are like siblings, with a special relationship that ought not be ruined by squabbles.

I agree with you Art, this passport requirement sounds like a bad, xenophobic move.

I have come to expect as much from this administration.

Kurt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. There's a special place in my heart for the Peace Arch
I don't know how many times I've walked through the arch and looked at the Canadian side, with its beautiful flowered Maple Leaf, then turned toward the American side, with its flowered Stars and Stripes, then read the inscription by those symbolic gates and prayed that good relations between our countries would continue forever. And I took my son there and told him the same thing your Dad told you :D I believe it was one of those unique experiences for my son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Dad always related to Sam Hill when pointing out the Arch
I wonder what Sam Hill would say today???

I have a feeling that he'd wish he'd never been born American.

Just sayin'....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
63. I used to cross the Peace Bridge from Buffalo into Canada w/my family.
When I was a child, all they asked was, "Where were you born?" Later, they asked, "Citizenship?"

It saddens me that our good relations with this great neighbor are being torn down systematically by the boobs in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
71. Of course it's foolish. But so is this entire administration.

NOthing they have done makes sense unless you view it from the winsow of paranoya. After all, we must keep the masses afraid. It's the best way to control them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
38. No, it's not a requirement for membership of the EU
The UK and Ireland still require passports for entry, even when coming from elsewhere in the EU. In fact, Iceland and Norway have signed the Schengen treaty despite being outside the EU, and Switzerland is in the process of ratification.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. I always held some pride in US-Canada relations
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 09:45 PM by JohnnyRingo
That we saw things on a par with Bob and Doug McKenzie.
That we could import our greatest comedians with a shared sense of humor.
That the US and Canada were in no way threats to each other's sovereignty.
That going to Niagara was little more hassle than a trip to Cedar Point.

Whenever something bad happens, I blame either GW Buxh or my best friend's wife.

Even my best friend's wife likes Canadians. And she hates everone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. what bothers me about this is the loss of civility in our oldest
international relationships. Too bad we've pissed even the Canadians off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Derek Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Canada has no problem with Democrats however we are
beginning to think that as far as Republicans are concerned we are now viewed as an enemy. That is a pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
53. Refuckians are more than an enemy in our eyes, they are a threat
to world peace and any semblance of order or humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty1 Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. As a Canadian I couldn't agree more....
It's a mutual admiration for sure! Luckily, my family has plans to vacation in your splendid nation this summer before new laws are implemented that require DNA testing and an Iris scan for all of us. My son wants to make his life time pilgrimage to the place where Michael Jordan performed his miracles in Chicago.
I only hope that the implementation of passports won't put a large dent in the border town economies. With the price of gas going up so much as well, it could become a costly journey.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. I smell a draft.
apparently this is exactly what they wanted. in anticipation of what's to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have a passport
thing is, if I go to Canada, can I stay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hell, most people probably don't know how to get a passport.
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 10:46 PM by tokenlib
This is such nonsense--at least with Canada. Now I have to find out how to get a passport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. it's very easy these days
I remember back in the day when you had to go to the World Trade Mart or whatever it was called in your major city to get passport and official photo. Much easier now. You can bring your own photo to pretty much any post office. If you belong to AAA, you can get free passport photos made at any of their offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. post office
its just that easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. i don't see any difference in having a DriversLicense & Birth
than a passport can anybody explain that???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. constitutional authority
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 11:53 PM by fryguy
both birth certs and drvier's lics. are issued by the states and not the federal government. this makes a difference since it is the federal government, and not the individual states, which has the power to regulate trade and commerce with foreign nations - this includes immigration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #29
45. Does the federal government think
you are more likely to be you with a passport than your are with a driver's license and birth certificiate? What ID do you have to show to get a passport?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. its not a matter of which is more likely be carried with someone
a passport is an internationally recognized travel document that verifies the nationality and identity of the person holding it. a drivers license is only a form of identification, not citizenship, and a birth certificate shows citizenship but not identification.

in addition, it is far better for people to travel with their passport and leave their birth certificates home in a safe place. this is because if you loose your passport you can get a new one, whereas it is very very difficult to replace a lost birth certificate. not to mention birth certificates are fragile and might not be able to stand up to much wear and tear. so, speaking as someone who's traveled quite a bit, if people are currently more likely to carry their birth certificates when traveling i think they ought to be encouraged to get a passport for their own convenience.

as for requirements to obtain passports, check here - http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/first/first_830.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #54
66. It's very, very hard
to get a birth certificate? All you have to do is request one. I have duplicate birth certificates in addition to the original ones for ALL my family members. I didn't find it in the slightest bit difficult to get them.

Thanks for the link. I read the requirements, the application, and the ID required. It is much more difficult to get a passport than a duplicate birth certificate (getting photos and going in person and taking oaths). For a person who might want to visit Canada or Mexico every few years or so, it is enough trouble to make some decide not to bother. That's really plain to see.

I've been to Canada twice as a youngster. I have absolutely no doubt I would never have visited Canada if my parents had been required to get passports for us all. In fact, a few years ago when I visited the Bahamas I would not have bothered if I had to get a passport first. This would have required taking at least a half a day off work for two people, nearly $200 in passport fees, ?? for the photos and a long wait hoping the passports would show up on time. Who is going to do that for a weekend? Not me that's for sure. If I take a vacation once every 10 years I'm lucky, so I'm certainly not likely to add another $200 or more to the cost. I'd stay home first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. Security and interop issues cause EU biometric passport delays
The most serious of the problems Frattini describes with some understatement as "still being finalised" relates to the planned use of a contactless chip to house the passport's data, and the security mechanisms used to protect that data from unauthorised readers. Contactless means (at least in theory) that travellers can breeze through the barriers with a wave of their passport, thus speeding their progress towards whatever destination immigration officials choose to assign them. But contactless also means that the data is vulnerable to snooping, and it should not take too much effort for would-be snoopers to produce devices that will read the passport data from a greater distance than the designers would wish.

Much US opposition to the technology complains, with characteristic insularity, that such systems would allow terrorists to identify Americans abroad and kidnap them. For our non-US readers, however, we should stress that such systems would allow terrorists to identify anybody and kidnap them. Or steal their ID. Or even better from the point of view of automation-happy kleptos, locate and steal their passports.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/01/eu_bio_passport_delay/

There will have to be some standardization on the chips. Can't see having two or three types of passports depending on ones destination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is there any aspect of life that shrubbie can't screw up?
All this is going to do is ensure that any possible terrorists (those without GOP approval anyway) pick a spot other than an official border crossing to move from Canada to the US or vice versa. Slow them down maybe a couple hours by making them go cross country or by boat. It wouldn't stop anyone other than a "Terrorist of passion" i.e. someone who, in a fit of rage, decided cross the border and steal nuclear material from a power plant or send anthrax laced letters to Democratic senators.

What it will do is piss off yet another country, lower world opinion of us, and inconvience law abiding citizens. Probably there's a companion plan to privatize the process for obtaining a passport - it would fit their MO to find a way to enrich some donors with no bid contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. I think it sucks
I live 20 minutes from Canada. For all of my 49 years, I've gone back and forth to Canada - sometimes on a whim, sometimes to play Bingo (high stakes unlike here), sometimes to shop. It's never seemed like another country to me. Just hopped in the car and went.

Canadians come over here just as easily and probably more often - I see their cars in all the shopping mall lots, flea markets, grocery stores - everywhere.

Our countries were FRIENDS. It is a friendship that has endured far longer than my lifetime (my parents got married in Canada), and bushit is screwing with one of our closest friends and allies, because they, unlike him, have common sense. He makes me sicker by the day, if that's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. those passports could keep dissidents from traveling
freely.

I think this is more about keeping us in, than keeping "them" out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
43. That is, I believe the REAL reason behind this move....
It's more about keeping us in, than keeping "them" out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. I totally agree.
Keeping us trapped.:banghead:

Milking us by forcing us to pay taxes to a Totalitarian Regime that we don't believe in and
using our children to fight a war to benefit$$$$ their corporations,
oppression as misinformation and lack of information about the real world by the mainstream news,
and the newest and latest threat: trying to shut down the blogger air waves like a gag order.

What more could The Bush Cabal Regime want as they wallow in their ill-gotten gain and enjoy the "spoils" of war as they continue to crack their whips on us, the slaves?:argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
31. Did CBC change the Headline ??
.
.
.

I don't see anything that indicates that it is "retaliation"

If they DID change it - it was a good idea

The article, including Public Security Minister Anne McLellan's comments don't indicate any sort of "getting even" attitude to me . .

Here's what I read for a Headline at the link:

"U.S. will demand passports from Canadians"


Personally, I don't give a hoot one way or t'uther

I ain't crossing that border ever again until the US parks that friggen War Machine

Little things like that "Patriot" Act unnerve me a wee bit

If they can stick there noses up their OWN citizens a$$es an peak around, or throw them in jail with no due process - I dinnae wanna be no furriner down there!!

I'd feel safer in Cuba thank you very much!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. I had to get my passport last Fall..
As part of my emigrating to Canada from the US; looks like I got mine just in time. I had to go down to Calgary (I live in Edmonton)to the American Consul; what a surreal experience..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
39. How would this impact seniors
travelling to get lower cost perscription drugs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. This will surely affect a LOT of Canadians
because we have many Canadians who own winter homes here in Florida. I'd say 10-15% of the people where I live are Canadians who bought their homes here to enjoy the warm winter climate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
60. not in the least, assuming they have a passport - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. How many have passports?
Will they realize they have to get them. Will they know how (and the expense) to get them? I think it would be solveable for most - but a real pain in the neck the first time finding that they are at the border check - and stuck there with no "acceptable" documentation.

A lot of folks don't have the luxury of travel beyond the immediate area and don't have passports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. its a passport - they're not hard to get
they can be gotten through the Internet and mail or, if you're unable to do that, from any post office, and they're not very expensive - $65 and valid for ten years. so if there is anyone that can afford a drivers license and make the effort to go to a DMV for it, than they can get a passport - its even easier since no eye exam is required for a driver's license.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
40. when we lose Canada, we lose ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
41. I would think that a passport
would be easier for a "terrorist" to obtain than a state specific Driver's License. If anything I think this will make the border less secure. Border patrol will be so busy checking and stamping passports that they'll stop using the instincts the use in an Q&A type situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
42. The largest open border in the world just closed. Thank the GOP. (nt)
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 06:42 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
47. Go Canada! Stand up to the bastards! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaDeacon Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
49. one word DRAFT !!!
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 11:17 AM by DaDeacon
Open your eyes guys this is a mesure to ensure that IF a draft is needed, that the road to our north and south are closed to dodgers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. And I say:

HELL NO, WE WON'T GO!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. so the bushies imposed the rule knowing Canada would reciprocate?
since the rule requires Canadians entering the US to have passports, not US citizens entering Canada to show them to leave the US . . . it is the Canadians who are imposing - quite rightly - this in response their own rule requiring that.

so if this is a plan to seal the boarders, it must mean the Canadian government is working in cahoots with Washington now....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
55. How much ARE passports?
And how easily available are they? I have an expired one - and I seem to recall it was somewhat of a hassle to get it, involving getting a special photo taken, and then having to take it to a federal building, and the whole process was time-consuming and completely ate into my work day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. its very easy
you can go to a post office or even do it from home online

http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/renew/renew_833.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
57. I wonder if the purpose is to keep Americans from finding out
about other countries. If the Average American has to get a passport to go to Canada or Mexico or the Caribbean, he or she might simply decide it's not worth the trouble of going.

Then everyone can sit around and say, "Them furrin countries don't got nothin' that we don't got right here in the good old U. S. of A."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
61. I just used my passport to go to Syracuse, NY, from NYC
Talk about border crossings. I know NYC is another planet, but really.

Seriously, I didn't want any hassles with TSA guards on a one-day Easter Sunday visit with family, and I've had problems with photo IDs that weren't driver's licenses. I once used a license that was still valid for four months, but that didn't stop one TSA person in Boston Logan from advising me to renew it promptly. A university photo ID worked at LaGuardia but didn't pass muster in Boston, so I just figured, use the passport to Syracuse and everyone was happy.

An article in today's WaPo reports on changes in policy that will require US citizens to use passports for all travel in the Americas by 2008 anyway, so Canada's retaliation is rather anticlimactic. The first passport is the worst to get because of the required official copy of one's birth certificate, but passport renewals aren't much trouble.

In this case there's no sense fighting city hall. It's not as bad as having to take off one's shoes and belt and stand on one foot and turn around in the middle of an airline terminal, and that's happened too often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #61
67. I recall that shortly after the Patriot Act was passed.
that a daughter of a congressman was traveling from Boston to Maine(?) and was asked for her passport. When she questioned the officer about it saying she didn't need a passport to travel within the US, the officer got belligerent with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
62. As well they should
Although that'll make it more difficult to sneak across the border when the Republic of Gilead comes to fruition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
68. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberallyInclined Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
69. so what? if you need it to return, OF COURSE you'll have it when you enter
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
70. So what's the real reason
behind this bush iniative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
72. Passports cost more
than they did. This is going to hurt the poor, people with large families, getting a passport for everyone, etc.
El Paso and Juarez are very close and families live on both sides of the border. Children from Juarez would go to Loretto Academy, Cathedral, Jesuit in El Paso everyday, this is going to be shitty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC