Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is he Johnny Gosch? (DU mentioned in article)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:20 AM
Original message
Is he Johnny Gosch? (DU mentioned in article)
By ERIN CRAWFORD
REGISTER STAFF WRITER
April 5, 2005

Johnny Gosch may finally have been found, thanks to Rush Limbaugh.

The Iowa paperboy was kidnapped in 1982, with unsubstantiated stories emerging later from his mother that he was abducted into a child pedophilia ring. No trace of him has ever been found, and no suspects have been arrested.

Nearly 23 years later, White House correspondent Jeff Gannon, who wrote for a conservative Web site, was exposed in February as James D. Guckert, a man with no journalism experience and links to several gay escort addresses online.

If you have the time to read a few hundred Web postings, you will see how Johnny Gosch and Jeff Gannon, two completely unrelated individuals, became the same person on the Web. The way the theory developed says much about the anything-goes nature of the blogosphere and self-proclaimed reporters on the Internet, who seem to find accuracy and proof a nuisance in uncovering fantastical conspiracies.

<snip>

The Gannon-Gosch conspiracy theory first appeared on the message board of a liberal political site called The Democratic Underground on Feb. 26. A site regular, using the name TwoSparkles, speculated that Jeff Gannon was victimized by a government-organized child pornography ring.

more: http://edit.desmoinesregister.gannettonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?NoCache=1&Dato=20050405&Kategori=LIFE04&Lopenr=504050376&Ref=AR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. wonderfuL
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 08:22 AM by sniffa
fuck them!

why don't they run a piece on my conspiracy that dubya Lost the abiLity to achieve an erection years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
143. LOLOL! Good one! Excellent Retort, Sniffa!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. When did Pigboy...
Become a DU'er? What's his screen name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
51. I heard his username was "Tandalayo" something-or-other..
KIDDING, KIDDING, I just couldn't resist.

*ducks thrown objects*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
75. Anyone up here registered as AnalCyst?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #75
106. or Hillbilly Hero (in)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceBuddy008 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
121. Holy.'man behind the curtain' your images jumped off the page...
us KuCitiZens FOUND yr. KerryPict and here is what wonked!

whaen the battle is for Higher ground WE got them bYE thIer SElvEvrS,we got them by they souls

AaaahhhUuuhhhh!

HOLy 'camradrie'

when BigMedia is EXposed cheaper to 'book' the Net
more later

defense SPenDing
I-Bomb-A-nation
A-Bomb-I-Nation

KloFF ot Her Po sTs
that mEans HI !

thanK You, POSTEWR OFG COMRADRIE IANdb1, YOU ARE kLOFF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lovely.
Thanks, guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Crikey!
My husband is absolutely furious with me over this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Why? Because he thought the speculation about the Gosch/Gannon...
...connection was ridiculous and irresponsible.

Now, that he sees my screen name mentioned as a propagator of the theory--in our local paper--he's not happy.

He'll get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Maybe also because it implies that your husband is married to
a man? :shrug:

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. Speculation can lead to discovery...
It is silly not to speculate on thing...regardless on how ridiculous the speculation may sound.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. First they ignore you, then they ridicule you...
Two Sparkles, this story, showing up in your local paper, lends more credence to the possibilities of Gannon/Gosch connection, not less. Why is this extensive story published there? It does nothing at all to disprove the link, it adds no new or verifiable information, only ridicule. To me that's a clue that the investigation and the "theories" were getting too hot. The FBI agent and the NYC investigator confirm the possibilities of identity and "whole life construction." Noreen Gosch calls the theory bizarre, according to the author of the story (without quotes) but she never refutes it. The article does not publish the picture progressions, they wouldn't dare do that! There is no proof at all that Gannon is Guckert, and the article carefully says that "a James Guckert graduated from..." very much like Gannon said in the interview on CNN-- when asked if he was indeed James Guckert, he said, "That's the name on my driver's license." This whole article reminds me of the tactic of the Swift Boat Vets, smear the messenger, raise doubts, but don't prove the theory wrong. The end line in the article referring to Operation Mockingbird is also interesting. Mocking. Hiding in plain site. It is what they do best.

That said, I don't think the blogosphere has absolute proof of anything, but the investigation is still legitimate. As in any brainstorming session, the group brings up all kinds of ideas without prejudice and maybe a connection for one builds on another. It is a very good way to break through rigid thinking, to look at a puzzle from different angles. And the Gannon/Guckert/Gosch story is still very much a puzzle. I, for one of many, am grateful to you for putting your thoughts out here on DU and for all of the incredible efforts of the posters on DU and elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
59. You're right, and really it's not very much ridicule
It seems they're both ridiculing AND leaving open the possibility that it is possible. As does Gosch's mother. On one hand, it's "bizarre", but on the other hand she doesn't know. To me it seems like a very strange article, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
62. "First they ignore you
then they ridicule you"'

This is some sort of aphorism meant to convey the idea that all silly ideas are eventually proven correct. They are not. The vast majority of the time when they ignore and you and ridicule you, it's for good reason.

This is such a case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #28
145. We quit talking about the Gannon/Gosch connection about a month ago.
We were letting it drop. Why would they feel the need to refute it now? If it wasn't true, they could've just let it drop. Why?

What are they hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
144. I actually like most of your posts! Now you're INFAMOUS!
That's not such a bad thing at times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Uh oh! 2SPARK's: Are you Rush Limbaugh ?
My hubs would be annoyed, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I can definitely say I'm not Rush Limbaugh! LOL (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well, it's not like they used your real name.
Anonymity is your friend. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
43. WHHHHHOOOO HOOOOO!!!!
Way to go!:woohoo: :applause:

Now is this good or bad that Rush "the big fat Idiot" is talking about this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
101. why is he talking about it now? no one has even mentioned it here lately
have they? Why would they bring this up now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
52. Jeez, TwoSparkles!
Thank God for usernames, pretty soon you may be interviewed on 20/20 or have a spot on the Tonite Show!:7 Ha!

It's interesting to see how they have been reading pretty deep into some of the stuff we post...........Wow!:wow: News travels fast!!!

Anyway, Hubby should lighten up :dilemma:(he'll get over it)

You have to admit it's kinda funny anyway!;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
100. don't let it bother you. this is a message board not a blog
you were supposing not newscasting. You are allowed to discuss what you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
republicansareevil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. yawn. who cares?
Didn't even read the link. How many thousands of posts does DU have per day? Anyone can cherry-pick the ones that sound crazy or take things out of context to make a reasonable post SEEM crazy. Why even give this article any attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. Maybe it was "GANNONGATE THREAD #54 UDPATE"
It went on far too long, it was so ridiculous I was suprised to read that Gannon hadn't spend a week camping up my ass :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
70. There were more than a few posts about the Gannon-Gosch connection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Holy sh*t!
LOL

My favorite part is that it is in the 'Recreation' section!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. The other side will only try to discredit DU
so fanciful conspiricy posts will be pointed out as a general concensus so we all may be labeled paranoid lunatics. The DU needs some good press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krupskaya Donating Member (689 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nice, uh, "journalism," too.
I'll be glad when newspapers are done with the whole "people say KA-RAZY things on the Internets!" story. It's getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. DU doesn't make the papers or TV when they discover the truth...
only when they make an error. Typical!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
35. Maybe DUers should spend more time obsessing about the truth
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 10:25 AM by BurtWorm
than about freeper Johnny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. There was no error
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 11:24 AM by slaveplanet
in this instance, only group speculation, fueled by disappearing webpages and search engine caches, shadowy right wing operative connections, Gosch's own mother, and investigators working on that case for the last twenty years. Any one worth a pebble knows that A DU member was also the first to post the Conneaut Lake HS photo's on the web, and even met a Vanity Fair writer there who was doing the exact same thing. Guess who was getting paid. How dare this DesMoine hack make hay out of a job she should be doing. Why was Gannon even allowed to be within knife throwing distance of the POTUS?
We still haven't gotten our answer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
48. The paper news medium is analogous to LPs
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 11:28 AM by acmejack
On edit: This was supposed to be a reply to Post 7!

It is rapidly losing readership. I only read the letters to the editor, obits, and the local news. The internet is the cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. Geez
This guy spent all this time and energy mocking a theory that in the beginning of his article says this:

"Gosch's mother, Noreen Gosch, called the theory "quite bizarre," but not impossible.

"We don't have anything conclusive," she said."

So yeah, maybe it's out there, but we don't really know for sure. He doesn't waste any of his prescious time to find out any details about Gannon/Gueckert that would conclusively put any of these theories to shame. He just uses ridicule?

Why the heck doesn't he put on his big boy media hat and figure out who Gannon/Gueckert is rather than printing out someone's theory on DU and wasting his time mocking it? So what if it's out there, sometimes truth is stranger than fiction. Anything is possible. I don't think Gannon is Gosch, but who knows?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krupskaya Donating Member (689 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. She.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
147. DNA would resolve it once and for all.
What's say, Noreen? Jeff/James?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kota Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. They left out the male prostitute and sex sites Gannon/Guckert
is connected with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. I noticed that too. Dwelled more on where it went wrong and
ignored all the correct findings...as well as the salacious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. ROFLMAO!
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 09:07 AM by foreigncorrespondent
"The Democratic Underground." Since when did DU begin using "the" in front of the site name?

Cripes, can't they get it right?

On edit: Just got home from work, and I am tired, so I made a few typos, which needed fixing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
93. Ha ha - - The DU; The kids; The little woman - - that's how we talk in IA
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. The FBI agent quoted in the article made an interesting
comment about what the CIA is capable of doing.

I didn't think it was a "bad" article, just another journalist trying to hang on to his job by discrediting bloggers.

I agree, why are these "journalists" looking for the real stories, like the Gannon-White House connection?

Shouldn't Jeffy had a complete FBI background check for his Hard Pass? That alone would have laid all these conspiracy rants by the MSM to rest.

I think the editor of that paper should be notified about flaky junk journalism being more harmful than anonymous bloggers! So the CIA-MSM connection noted at the end of the article really doesn't sound that bizzarro...:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. So what's his agenda? I'd say it's more about defending Gannon, less
about DU. Bashing DU is just frosting.

It would be different if the mother of John Gosch had bashed the theory and condemned DU.

The big thing here is that Limbaugh is trying to defend and deflect. Defend Gannon. Deflect a male porn connection theory by attacking people who discussed it.

The inference is that the theory is irresponsible - which is a roly-poly stomach laugh coming from him.

The bottom line is that he wrote to protect Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Bingo!
Peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
57. Jeff Gannon = MSM (Male Seeking Male) Reporter
I think we should use that pun once in a while when speaking to the "other MSM" (Main-Stream-Media).

























Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #57
84. Funniest pics I've seen all year!
Thanks for all of those. Made my day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #57
102. very, very funny pics
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
114. exactly, Higher class
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 11:58 AM by hiley
:hippie: It would be different if the mother of John Gosch had bashed the theory and condemned DU.

The big thing here is that Limbaugh is trying to defend and deflect. Defend Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. *yawn*
who cares. right, USA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. Surfing the blogs - the source of stories for non-journalists. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. well said rooboy....
lazy assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. This is terrible for the real story ...
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 10:00 AM by HamdenRice
because it picks up on all the allegations that basically have been proven to be groundless.

Yet there are several big stories, which the MSM is assiduously trying to avoid reporting -- from the basic problem that a gay prostitute had been ushered into the WH press corps by a group of highly placed republican operatives, its connection to the bigger picture of purchased columnists and govt-paid-for-propoganda fake news segments, to the perfectly documented connections between Guckert/Gannon and Aziz al-taee of Nick Berg and faked Iraqi intel scandals.

This is just an excuse for the MSM to NOT deal with the issue.

The Gannon wrinkles conspiracy theories, from Hunter Thompson to Gosch to aliens to mind control have done real damage to the real story.

<edited>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. HamdenRice, please note that Noreen Gosch did not discount
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 10:23 AM by merh
the possibilities or deny that jg is Johnnie.

Your view as to what is the real story is your view. Don't discount others who have different views or may consider this a part of the real story.

If it was a non-story and just to ridicule the speculation and the speculators, why the heck was it published in the first place.

I have seen no articles about the poppy connection to JFK's assasination published or about the "murder" of Pope Paul in 1978, which would be appropriate for posting today, given the pope-mania. I have seen nothing ridiculing the 9/11 conspiracy theories or MIHOP or LIHOP.

Again, your theories are wonderful, I believe you are on to something as you continue to investigate bulldog, but your angle is not the only angle or the only "real story".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
95. I agree, as usual Merh.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #95
113. Thanks for the thumbsup!
;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DARE to HOPE Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
29. Do you think this is an attempt to contain this explosive story?
After all, one detail left out was the name of the editor of the DesMoines Register when Johnny Gosch was first kidnapped. Wasn't it James Gannon?

The finger has been pointed rather pointedly at them. And they had to write something.

And even though she rather mocked it, she still did mention Operation Mockingbird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #29
50. I could go with that explanation ...it makes more sense.
Besides, I find it very interesting that the mom did not condemn the story.

Victims of childhood sexual abuse often go into prostitution, stripping or become sexually promiscuious, a psycologist once told me that it becomes a way of controlling the abuser from their past by controlling men (if they were the perps) as adults and gaining back lost power from when they were abused as a child ...there is some interesting probability to all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
99. Unbelievable! The Editor's name was James Gannon? I haven't been
following Guckert/Gannon closely - that went over my head.

Let me ask...the FBI creates new identities for people at risk who cooperate with the government. If the govt insiders arrange a new life for Guckert/Gannon....would they have him married and converted from homosexuality? Don't fundulls claim that they can convert someone from homor to hetereo?. Is he convertible? He also seems to need brain washing to learn discretion and forget his military, excort, and 'journalism' careers.....and now, possibly his Franklin background.

The drama, innuendo, intrigue, arrogance - could not have been created in fiction...it is beyond fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. There no such thing as bad press....
wtg 2spark.....your nation wide!!!!!lololololololol...and with good company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
31. Accuracy and proof a nuisance? Don't confuse us with the * administration
"The way the theory developed says much about the anything-goes nature of the blogosphere and self-proclaimed reporters on the Internet, who seem to find accuracy and proof a nuisance in uncovering fantastical conspiracies."

Well, heaven forbid that accuracy and proof raise their ugly little heads in the rush to war against Iraq.

I do not think, never did, that Jiffy-Lube Jeff is/was Gosch. However, I would encourage Mr. or Ms. Erin Crawford that his/her time would be better spent discovering precisely who this shadow-bound imposter is, rather than throwing stones at those who attempt to make an honest effort to uncover his real identity. There are still many questions out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yep, the really whacked out conspiracy theories on DU is all they'll
ever report.

Expect some "chem trail" threads to get mention some time, too.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Because it is part of their conspiracy to make DU and the blogs
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 11:01 AM by merh
appear to be kooks and conspiracy theorists! :tinfoilhat: :sarcasm:


Actually, I think that is a wonderful question, I don't have an answer. Welcome to DU! :hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
54. Tribal150, welcome to DU and that is one helluva great idea!!
Let him deny it!! Cuz if it is not true and it has caused him financial harm he can sue for libel damages!!! And I've been wondering why he hasn't. Now it's in the print media. Let's see what he does. I want DNA!! HAAHAA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. Yes, indeed. One would think he would have done it long ago...
quite a reasonable way to stop any further speculation. Welcome to DU, Tribal150! Nice save!

Hello, Mojo! Always nice to run into you on the threads...

Peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #64
94. Hey, fooj! Good running into you too, especially here!
Ain't it just a tad bit fun!

Peace back at you, my friend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Wouldn't that have been a good story?
Des Moines Register, are you reading this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bin.dare Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
66. kudos to RI ...
...
"Though the photos' perspectives differ, and it's proof of nothing, the alignment of features is striking," wrote blogger Jeff Wells on Rigorous Intuition (rigorousintution. blogspot.com).

hey, this DM Register article is not dissing the G/G/G theory --- there are many such balanced statements as above in it. Also it gives full citation to RI allowing interested people to be more informed. Why? Something curious is definately afoot. Of course, she also has

"Have you ever heard of Operation Mockingbird?" he asked.
It's another theory. It argues that the press is being controlled by the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. I wonder too.
Perhaps the MSM is just too afraid to dive right in and risk being right or wrong. Wrong could get you ridiculed....right could get you killed.

Maybe they need the blogosphere to ask and develop the politically/socially controversial stories to provide the cover for bringing the story above ground. This article doesn't really answer anything....but it will make more people curious enough to start reading up on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bin.dare Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. stories abound about how in the former soviet union ...
... articles would be printed in the press this way (ostensibly dissing a subject) but everyone learned to read between the lines so that you actually had quite a well informed population. and there was nothing the politburo could do!!

is that where america is going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Why On Earth Should She, Ma'am?
Why should anyone pay the least attention to this sort of folly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. You think this story is "folly" sir?
You think all of us who want to know who "Gannon" is are FOOLS, SIR??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. The Idea, Sir, That Guckert is Gosch
Is indeed folly, and of the most absurd and entertaining sort; it is no wonder a journalist with a local angle plucked this thing up for a humorous piece.

The actual background of Guckert does offer some interesting possibilities for enquiry, most particularly the questions of how he came into ciontact with the Talon operation, and whether of not that involved his "top-man" services for some client. My suspicion is that the answer to the latter is yes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. I'm with you on this one. I've watched this "developing story" with morbid
fascination as it grew here on DU. But mostly I watched with a an eye for worry about what might occur if this story got cherrypicked by a large news outlet in the same manner. It was good for laughs and sometimes the occassional murmer but that was it.

I really hope this does not come back to bite anyone here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
136. you might want to listen to noreen gosch!
listen here...

http://johnnygosch.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=browse&id=5267&pageid=53

mrs gosch says if this is johnny its a big story, if it is not it is still a big story!


she sent private dectectives for a dna test gannon would not comply , mrs gosch called gannon as well..he would not discuss it with her..she said she wants answers and she wants a dna test...

of gannon,,,and she said the blogger did a good job!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. um, because it's a dumb idea??
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 11:56 AM by WoodrowFan
Since they're 12 years apart in age, and its known what Pennsylvania schools he went to, and we have his school photos, why should Guckert's Mom bother? To quiet some really, really silly "theories?"

(edited to change 14 to 12) It's a plot! It's a plot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. they did find people who knew him
as well as school photos and records. And Guckert joined a fraternity int he id 1970s, when Gosch would have been about 9 years old! KOS has a good timeline.


Sorry, the only thing "weird" here is that this tinfoil tale hasn't been laughed back into the closet with "faked moon landings" and "the hollow earth"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/28/82111/6781

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #47
56. Was Gannon/Guckert an orphan? Who raised him?
If he was orphaned, how/why did it happen? If he isn't an orphan, who/where are his parents?

My interest has been tickled, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #47
60. It may be silly, but wouldn't a REAL biography of Guckert be interesting?
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 12:02 PM by IanDB1
And wouldn't it make the kidnapped-Guckert theory more discredited (and the conspiracy bloggers more silly) if they presented a point-by-point refutation?

There are magazines like Skeptical Inquirer and Skeptic Magazine that spend hundreds of pages a year discrediting much sillier things-- creationism, Holocaust Revisionism, ghost stories, The Bermuda Triangle, Bigfoot, psychics and UFO's-- yet nobody has bothered to offer a comprehensive refutation.

I am not saying the theory is correct or even likely.

I am not even saying it isn't silly.

If journalists can be bothered to spend countless man-hours debunking such incredibly silly things, then why not the theory that Guckert was a kidnapped paperboy? At least that theory does not require magic or divine intervention, which has to make it at least less silly than Creationism or ESP.

I'm just saying that:

1) The MSM is being lazy (again).
2) A comprehensive refutation of this theory (even if it's a silly theory) would be interesting. Inquiring minds want to know: Who Is James Guckert?

I want to see yearbook photos, interviews with old classmates, his Presidential Physical Fitness Certificate from 6th grade, interviews with his mom and old neighbors and school teachers and athletic coaches. I want to hear from the minister who presided over his Confirmation or the Rabbi that Bar Mitzvahed him. I want to see all these people sit down in front of Barbara Walters or at the very least Jimmy Kimmel.

Not because I think there is necessarily something to the theory, but because THAT would be GOOD (REAL) journalism.

That would be much more interesting than "Silly bloggers on the internets think James Guckert was kidnapped as a child." It would be much better to tell us all who James Guckert REALLY is.

But that would require MSM "journalists" tearing themselves away from their desks and doing more than simply rehashing the latest press releases that arrive in their email.

Below: Where James Guckert REALLY came from (artist's conception):
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. it's a little early
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 12:22 PM by WoodrowFan
the "theory" is a little new for the Skeptical Inquirer and such. But here's the KOS link for what's known so far.

Besides, there's enough known already (such as the 12 year age difference) to make it clear the "theory" has no basis, but that hasn't stopped the tin foil brigade!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/28/82111/6781
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. that last line
//.. January 26, 2005

Fast forward through hundreds of day passes and scores of partisan "Gannon" queries to the fateful day of the infamous question. You know, the one where he strafes the Democratic leadership and President Bush succumbs to a snicker. First, a long preamble, jumbled in with a made-up stolen quote from Rush Limbaugh, and then the final, jarring phrase that brought a firestorm of scrutiny down upon him, his "news" agency and White House vetting standards:

"Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. Harry Reid was talking about soup lines, and Hillary Clinton was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet, in the same breath, they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you said you're going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

Mr. "Gannon," take a deep breath. You're about to get "googled." //

....is precious

I mean can you really blame people for searching every crevice...It's a CT'ers dream...

and by no means is DU the only guilty party

even if the Gosch angle is poppycock... think of all those scandals that got rehashed in the process, and introduced to a whole new younger generation.

It's more valuable than any MSM hack piece....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #65
80. How likely is it that Guckert is a DIFFERENT missing child?
Run-away kids very often become mixed-up in child pornography, prostitution or worse-- Republican politics.

How surprised would we be to find out that Guckert is indeed a missing child-- just not the particular child in the conspiracy theory?

How much of a past do we really know he has?


Artist's renderig of James Guckert as a child

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. not too likely
as KOS has pretty much nailed down his past. At least enough to rule out "missing child" porn rings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. I'm still hoping for Extra-Terrestrial Visitor or Cyborg From The Future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. I'm putting my money on
genetic experiment gone horribly wrong. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. Perhaps another illegitimate child of Strom Thurmond?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bethany Rockafella Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #83
119. How much is KOS paying you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
46. My question isn't why they singled out DU....
It's why they ever bothered to report upon such ludicrous foolishness at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
55. They still haven't proven this theory incorrect.
The story states that Gannon's mother "isn't convinced either way."

Neither am I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. I think when they
showed the 12 year age difference, that pretty much disproved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. It has yet to be disproved or denied.
How odd - someone get gannon's water glass on April 8.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #63
71. Ah, so Guckert/Gannon is HONEST about his age, but not his credentials
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 01:44 PM by mzmolly
profession, or much else.

It has been surmised that when one is in "hidden protection programs" and the like, age is often changed along with the name.

But, I'm certainly not gonna carry the "Gannon = Guckert" banner myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. It would appear so
given the appearance of his high school yearbook, which clearly places him 12 years older than Gosch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
85. I haven't seen the pic.
Can you provide the link. Unless you're talking about that wimpy kid who played soccer and looked nothing like Gannon/Guckert .. Gosch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #85
89. I can't tell you the thread #...maybe 12 or 13?
There were a bunch of HS pics....the Guckert in the golf team photo's don't look like the same guy. The HS pics could be a young Guckert with hair. But that morph of Gosch sure was compelling, too.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #55
137. please do listen to noreens interview yesterday!
http://johnnygosch.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=browse&id=5267&pageid=53

and if this whole thing haqs come to nothing ..the franklin story was real why did the newspaper ignore that??

and if this did nothing but educate americans to the pedophelia ring that existed, under the * and reagan admin and then we have a prostitute sitting within feet of the president..why are they no0t asking questions that we all asked..why is this subject being shut up?? i have questions for people who are so willing to try to shut up the questions about gannon..i have serious questions of people who are not inquiring why was gannon so close to our president after 9/11??

me thinks some protest too much!~!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
68. I read most of the wrinkle threads.
How is this different than a bunch of people sitting around and speculating about the content of Cheney's Energy policy meetings? The only difference is that the discussion is handled via written word rather than verbal.

I was intrigued when I saw the morphing pictures....certainly enough to continue reading the threads until the HS pics were posted. Because we allow ourselves to ask questions....that's a bad thing? For those that ridicule CT posters here....please share your thoughts about the Franklin Savings scandal and how that 1989 story went from 30 point page 1 Washington Times expose to nada in one day....nothing there either, right?

Anyway, I, too, would like to see what other facts are still to be unearthed about Mr. Gannon/Guckert. Why no personal history after HS? I still think his prostitution website had other purposes other than to provide Jimmy-Jeff supplemental income from his day job as an administration call boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
73. What in THE fuck!!!!
So because this son of a bitch TALKED about something, he figured it all out? This is atrocious.
The Des Moines register can seriously kiss my ass. I truly got the feel from this article they were just trying to discredit bloggers. A whole article based on bloggers findings and then Skolnick gets brought into it... Why no AmericaBlog? Why none of the actual sites that Gannon owned? No Franklin Credit mentions.

i am so angry over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. Easy does it.
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 02:04 PM by sfexpat2000
I was stifling-myself-Edith, but maybe this will help.

I wrote to the reporter and copied the editor,

- pointing out lapses in the MSM reporting on Mr. Gannon's credentials, up to and including this piece.

- pointing out that the discussion at DU made no claims

- asking why it was more in the "public interest" to discredit the internet than to present the facts of Mr. Gannon's story?

and

if you'd like to talk about this, pm me. It would be nice to give everyone a break from Gannon/Shiavo/Pope before the next fire gets lit. The opposition specializes in setting multiple fires, don't they?

peace,
Beth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
74. who here read the ENTIRE article???
First of all, what does Limbaugh have to do with anything? The article didn't spell out his role in all of this.

The first half of the article mocks the theory but then the second half gives many reasons why it could be possible. I finished it not really knowing what to think.

I never really read much of the Gannon wrinkle threads so I admit I don't know much of what has already been discussed on DU, but after reading this article, I'm blown away at the idea of a pedophile ring in DC for the "upper echelons". WTF? Maybe Gannon is Gosch, maybe not, but one thing I do know...this article legitimized the pedophile ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #74
91. ...and we all know that pedophile rings do exist.
At one time, in a small western town I know of, the Sheriff's office was watching a group of upper echelon local citizens who were getting lots of mail from Thailand and countries like that a taking trips there in groups. It was later discovered to be a pedophile ring that focused on men preying on little boys overseas in poor third world countries. Truly sick bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #74
98. Probably to get the Rush fans interested in the story.
Dittoheads are in the thousands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zerex71 Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
78. He's not too creative, is he? All the aliases are JG...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. hmmm gannon gosche guckert ---- g g g upside down
is 666

is it not?






*ducking*
just had to do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
79. What an odd article...
Why do a story on Gannon/Gosch just to discredit DU and bloggers? It's like they wanted the info out there for the world to see, but at the same time were washing their hands of it!

It will be interesting seeing what develops from this ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bin.dare Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. my feeling too, but who is this "jeff" ? ...
... there is a blogger in Iowa called "jeff" on a site called "Tusk and Talon". he has all the RW talking points down perfectly. He has on a few occasions dissed Erin Crawford. We know JG has Iowa contacts, is this it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
87. In any crime the most likely explanation is the simplest, Gosch is
most likely raped, killed and buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #87
107. Nice theory
only 2 flaws in it ...the killed and buried part.

you see If you had bothered to follow the wrinkles threads , then you'd know we have court testimony ,under oath . that Noreen , had a visit from her son in the late 90's.....

So if your post is an attempt to mock the people who spent a lot of time trying to sort this all out, as loony CT'ers

maybe your energy would be best directed at mocking your own brand of CT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #107
110. someone claiming to be Gosch visited Noreen according to Noreen
I don't assume that to be true without corroborating evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #110
111. yet, you are quick
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 10:38 AM by slaveplanet
to assume he is killed and buried without any evidence of that being the case.

and your basis is .. that some stranger had plastic surgery so he could duplicate Jonny Gosch's birthmarks for one clandestined late night visit with Noreen Gosch in attempts to get her to back off...:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #111
112. Raped, killed and buried or dumped is the predominant MO for
kidnapped children who are abducted by strangers.

I don't assume anyone had plastic surgery to fool Noreen because I don't presume that the claim of the visit is true. Like the Schiavo's, Noreen has a lot of motification to fabricate claims.

Whatever Gannon is NOT in his 30's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #112
116. How do you figure
is motification supposed to be motivation? If that's your theory , you may want to know this, She didn't disclose that information freely. She only gave that testimony ,against her wishes, against her sons wishes when asked UNDER OATH if she had ever been visited by her son, John Gosch, since the kidnapping had taken place. She was bound to disclosure under threat of perjury.

Noreen Gosch is not the criminal here, she is the victim.

She has only reported futher on the visit, once the cat was already out of the bag....If you have evidence of her criminal perjury, Now would be a good time to produce that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
92. I don't know what to say about this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #92
126. i don't know what to say either other than...
seems to me we may have gotten closer than others are comfortable with and they want to neuter the speculation!
after all thats what we were doing... is speculating with alot of facts and alot of inferance..but one thing is for sure..we were doing alot more than this newspaper or any msm in this country was in trying to figure out who the heck gannon is! and for that the msm should hang their heads in shame! they are dispicable that they have let the ball drop...same as all the media who lied and carried forth the "it must be dems" on the talking points of the teri shiavo story...yes it was talking points..and helloooo rush, hellooo o'liely, and hello washington post, and helloooo ny times...if you had investigated you would not have said it was a set up by dems , and you would not have lied to the american people..you ass sucks..it was mel martinez's office ..his legal guy..you filthy lazy asses..so if you media did your damn jobs we wouldnt be speculating!!

we would already know the truth..but truth is the furthest thing from your little so called journaliatic minds isn't it rush and msm??

wow those pukes make me puke!!

i think everyone who was on the wrinkles to begin with were doing what the media should have been doing ..and i am darn proud of everyone who did all the research..thats how you get to the truth..by looking under every rock...our media used to do that ..now they just give monica jobs to *!!

fly



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
96. Remember the saying "There's no such thing as bad publicity?"
Or "Just make sure to spell my name right?" I think that DU being mentioned is a good thing and can only serve to draw more people here.

It would either cause the people who are NOT familiar with DU to come here out of curiousity. The people who are familiar with DU are either dead set against it or dead set for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RAF Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
97. It's a hit piece
Mind you, I don't buy the Gannon/Guckert/Gosch story but this write up did it's best to put all liberal bloggers under an umbrella of conspiracy nuts.

Am I the only one who finds it more than a coincidence that Gannon/Guckert will also be the feature attraction of the National Press Club this week, April 8th?

For months we hardly hear a word about Gannon/Guckert from any corporate media and in a span of a few days he's covered in detail by two fairly prominent media outlets.

This has a stench of Rove behind it as if to sidetrack people off the true story behind Gannon/Guckert by discrediting all bloggers as tinfoil hat wearers. Sounds very similar to the Tang Document scandal (CBS/Bush AWOL)...imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #97
127. well if there are still americans who haven't figured out the rove m.o.
than they don't deserve to live in this country or have the things we are so accustomed to like..freedom and bill of rights and a constitution, they then are too damn ignorant to reside in this country..and share those freedoms!

fly

p.s. maybe thats too strong but that is how i am feeling anymore..people pay no attention until it bites them in the rear..well thats not being a good american..thats a lazy person who no longer deserves for us to care about them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
103. I wish people would just give this up.
Even I don't believe the "Johnny Gosh" issue is worth pursuing--for any reason related to Gannon/Guckert, C.I.A. mind-control conspiracies, or any other Bush-related investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BamaBecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
105. My response to the De Moines fish wrapper
Is he Johnny Gosch?

I became very angry as I read your article. You want to get credit for writing this "puff piece", while you make fun of those investigating the story? So you think it's funny that this story is being investigated? Did you laugh out loud, while speaking with Mrs. Gosch? How very noble of you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
108. Reporting for duty
"...self-proclaimed reporters on the Internet, who seem to find accuracy and proof a nuisance in uncovering fantastical conspiracies."


A nuisance? I think the people here revel in the search for proof. We raise questions, search for proof, and sort it all out. This reporter has it completely backwards.

Aren't journalists the ones who are supposed to be researching this stuff, not ordinary citizens???

We report, you decide.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #108
109. Lining up right behind you
and reporting for duty as well. It's not "proof and accuracy" that people here find a nuisance, it's the MSM attempts to discredit the pursuit of said goals before they can be attained that we find a nuisance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #108
128. you bet your bippy!! thats what
Edited on Thu Apr-07-05 04:39 PM by flyarm
journalists are supposd to do..but see we on the internet are scaring the crap out of them..because we are doing a better job than they are and we are making them insignificant..they are worthless fish wrap!!

they are crap now..we dont need them..and they know it and we scare the crap out of all of them!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bethany Rockafella Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
115. What does Rush Limbaugh have to do with this?
Very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #115
117. strange indeed
Limbaugh trying to protect Jeff Gannon.
Says alot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bin.dare Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #115
120. it seems Lush brought Gannon to the fore by commending him ...
... for his WH reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceBuddy008 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
118. Who is his Benefactor(s)? is he a SS agent of some sort ?
speculation from one of the 'wrinkle' threads that he is an expert covert 'penetration' agent, schooled in the spook art of blackmail.

is it possible there is campaign to create these 'manchurian' slaves

extreme loyalty overides the moral, ethical 'conscience' when it comes to doing bad things

Peter Dale Scott, war pentagon researcher, says the security establishment went bad when we took the 'gloves off' and sunk to the level and tactics of 'enemies' to win 'the game'

I think were #1 now in dastardly MaMa Mia Machevellian ism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
122. Here is some stuff from General Discussion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
123. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #123
125. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #125
133. KICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #123
130. that interview is noreen and she is saying this could be huge
she has contacted gannon and ssked for a dna test so this story can be stopped or verified..

she also mentions andy..and i was on wrinkles 1 when andy first contacted noreen...

and we have discussed it from the get go..

and it seems to me there are some people trying their darnest to shut this story down and out...but me thinks they protest too much!!

and either way like noreen says ..its a big story ..and noreen says the bloggers did a good job...so thats good enough for me!

i will say again..i am very proud of all those who wprked so hard on the wrinkles threads... those who took it seriously and you know who you are..you did an incredible job..its just too darned bad we have to do the job in this and 9/11 that the media refuses or intentionally ignors!! we are the new media and we are scaring the bee gee bees out of the crooks who call themselves journalists!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #130
132. ohhh and let me add...
too all the so called journalists who care to read this...let this be a warning..if you are not willing to do your job as outlined in our constitution..then get out of our way..because we will not be stopped to get the truth to americans any way we can and must..it is our duty as americans..." we the people" ..we take that "we " very seriously..even if you don't!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #132
141. Left on, Flyarm!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
124. If Noreen thought he was her son.....
why would she say anything? If all of this were to found true that Gannon is Gosch, then damn near everyone involved is going to become 'depressed' and start dying. So i wouldnt say shit either.

I do believe he is, I do believe he was kidnapped by other children involved with the Franklin Credit Union (Paul Bonacci UNDER OATH,) and i do believe that our country has a truly scary underlying current.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #124
131. Read point blank at the link in the post above.
n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #131
138. HEY MERTH CAN YOU PM ME..THAT POINT BLANK
ARTICLE HAS BEEN REMOVED!!

if you kept it can you pm it to me?? thanks..or i will have you email it to me off du!! thanks!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #138
139. Will do!
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #139
140. thanks merth!!!..and thanks others who sent it to me..!!
guess it was too hot!!

lol..fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #140
148. So plenty have seen the article!
How curious :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
129. ironicly this article has issues of it's own
first it assumes that Bloggers are some monololithic entity.

But anyone with a computer, time and inclination can make a blog and they often disagree with one another.

Of course sites where people can post would seem to have a 'collective truth". becuase we spend a lot of time argueing back and forth until the best arguement wins. Even on DU where we all start more or less on the same page, we argue back and forth.

That's what that market place of ideas was all about.

Which brings us point Two, it implies that everybody here came to a consensus that Gannon/Guckert was gosch. I sure as hell didn't. In fact I saw many good posts here pointing out the problems with this idea entire scenerio.
Were those posts in this guy's story? I didn't see any. Did I miss them?

Indeed, by this writer's own account, the "few hundred Web postings" only came from a few individuals, like that one guy who posted to over 80 sites.

I admit I was willing to entertain the possibility. That's a far cry from beleiving it as truth. an Open mind is not the same as gullability.

Which leads to three, that yes, anyone can post any thing they want on the internet. Just like a reporter can write any story he wants too. But that doesn't mean there aren't checking mechanisms.

For Reporters, they have to get past thier editors and then be able to back up what they say as true should readers call them on it.

Bloggers don't have editors to keep them from getting published but they too must be able to back up what they say. even more so since thier critics have just as much power to post as the blogger in many cases. and a site that is seen as uncredible will soon be ignored for others that are.

Ironicly, while Mr. Crawford is criticising blogging and DU, he ignores that the MSM hasn't exactly acquitted itself so well when it comes to fact chacking and be wary of irresponsable stories. The MSM seems to have become frequent victims of 'collective truth". If paid and trained "profesionals" are having so many lapeses, why should unpaid amateurs be under a higher standerd?

So for a guy who seems to be painting the internet as untrustworthy (and by comparison the MSM as credible), Mr. Crawford seem to make a lot of mistakes himself... he uses half truths and takes stuff out of context. he uses posts that supports his point and ignores others that don't. He paints a diverse group with a broad brush and misrepresents the forum he is talking about. (The mere fact that blogging and the MSM work in different ways and have different ways of checking themselves does not by itself make blogging untrustworthy nor the MSM credible). and he uses the rather tired conspiracy smear..as if conspiracies themselves are impossible.

Though that this kind of story would surface requires no conspiracy to account for it. The MSM doesn't like that the bloggers showed them us as the lazy and to often corrupt shills many of them are. They aren't used to competition for dispersing info, much less havign thier gate keepers sidetracked. So naturally the MSM will pounce on any mistake any blogger makes.

Which is good. it will keep bloggers honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
134. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
135. What about the Dem 'rebuke'?
What about the Dem 'rebuke'?
This may have to do w/more of a deflection move to keep you from taking seriously the Dem report on Rawstory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #135
146. Deflection is the name of the game, but...
I can't figure this one out. IF they were real journalist's spending time investigating issues we need answer's to, would they be reading blogs?

But, if they are reading this thread - I've always wondered why they stop at investigating the reason G/G knew about Plame!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
142. And BIGFOOT is the Next of Kin!
Bunch of Un-Er-Mer-I-Kins! Idiots! Dim-witted, freepen idiots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
149. Jeff Gannon/Guckert IS 47 years old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #149
150. Please stop trying to confuse people with facts
Son't you know that fall right into Rove's plans? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #150
151. You mean like the real research Susan G of Daily Kos has done?
Gannon also worked at Karnak Inc. in West Chester, PA as reported by me and verified by Susan G.

He is a 47 year old skank that lies about his age on his escort sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC