http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/28/weekinreview/28TYLE.html?ex=1065326400&en=5ffaf2b958caad87&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLEAGHDAD, Iraq — The decision by the Bush administration to seek Turkish, Indian and Pakistani troops for peacekeeping in Iraq has reached what many Iraqi political figures knew from the outset would be its final destination: the department of ideas whose time has not come. "We do not want Turkish troops in Iraq," said a Kurdish member of Iraq's Governing Council last week. His sentiments were shared not only by fellow Kurds, whose frustrated national ambitions make for relations of mutual mistrust with the Turks. Some non-Kurdish members of the council also wonder how Iraq's other neighbors, particularly Iran, might react if Turkey got even a toehold in the territory of their oil-rich neighbor.
India and Pakistan — the other foreign candidates that Washington was hoping would send enough troops to relieve the strain on American armed forces — conjured an even more delicate problem: where to deploy them so they would not be at each other's throats.
Some Iraqis feared that however much Iraqi territory separated the nuclear rivals of South Asia, the two armies might find a way to harass each other in Iraq over some imaginary "line of control" like the one that separates their formations in Kashmir.
It has been hard enough to win the peace among a restive population that resents the current American occupation without worrying about keeping peace among the peacekeepers.
<snip>