Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Schiavo Case a Precursor to Battles Ahead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:39 PM
Original message
WP: Schiavo Case a Precursor to Battles Ahead
By Dana Milbank
Thursday, March 31, 2005; 10:39 AM

The political passions stirred by the Terri Schiavo case over the past fortnight are but a hint of the feud likely to come this summer with an expected Supreme Court confirmation battle, partisans on both sides say.

Republicans say the Schiavo fight has mobilized its conservative base for the struggles to come over President Bush's judicial nominations. In defeat, they believe Schiavo's death could become a rallying point for a broader "culture of life" movement to secure judges and a justice who would restrict abortions.

"It is entirely possible that in her death Terri Schiavo will become a symbol for many people about a disturbing trend in American culture," said Gary Bauer, a prominent conservative activist. Predicting a "donnybrook" over the eventual Supreme Court nominee, he said the Schiavo case "will make more acute the feeling at the grass roots that too many of the most important decisions are being made by unelected judges."

Democrats are comforted in knowing that the intervention in the case by Congress and the president has been resoundingly rejected--not just by the courts but by large majorities of Americans and even some conservative commentators. "The other side has overplayed its hand and taken a beating," said Jim Jordan, a Democratic strategist.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15454-2005Mar31.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't get why MSM
and repubs keep thinking this is going to benefit them politically. Did they not see the poll that said 82% opposed congress getting involved? Another poll said about 70% agreed with the husband about removing the feeding tube. This is not a winning issue for the fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The fundies don't care how unpopular their stand is.
Have you forgotten? Their god is using them to straighten out the rest of us. With god on their side, how can they lose? We should be thankful they want to save our depraved and barbaric souls from eternal damnation!!! SARCASM OFF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMHO
the churches around this country are going to see a drop in attendance once they start preaching "constitutional amendment"!!

I knew this was coming as soon as the religious freaks made this very sad, very personal situation into a dog and pony show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So does this mean republians no longer favor the death penalty?
Culture of life and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, good point
I'm wondering how * is going to try to use this to raise his approval rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. yes and they must favor universal health care as well.
if we respect life, we must take of people so they can continuing living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Activist judges?
"Republicans say the Schiavo fight has mobilized its conservative base for the struggles to come over President Bush's judicial nominations. In defeat, they believe Schiavo's death could become a rallying point for a broader "culture of life" movement to secure judges and a justice who would restrict abortions."

I thought the idea was to NOT have activist judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Its a private family/doctor issue period.
the government needs to stay the hell out. maybe the repukes should check some of the basic tenets of republicanism, like small government that stays out of people's personal lives. Oh and then there's their latest mantra about respect for the sanctity of marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is how the GOP is framing this
http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/11278167.htm

CAPITOL HILL A leading congressman is calling Terri Schiavo's death a "legal tragedy" and a result of "moral poverty."
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says Schiavo died because the legal system "did not protect the people" who need it most. He's vowing that will change -- and that "the men responsible for this" will have to answer for their behavior.

Meantime, House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner is calling on Congress to pass a bill aimed at preventing others from going through the same legal battles.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist says he's "deeply saddened" by what he calls a "regrettable loss of life."

but the Dems say nothing because they think they have won. So while the Dems are savoring their supposed victory, the GOPers go on attack "spinning" the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't think Americans
want a law that interferes with private matters!

I think Americans wish to be left alone on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Culture of Life"
"Please, Governor Bush, don't KILL me!"

How many Iraqi children killed since 1991? 500,000? 750,000?

1500-odd American young people sacrificed to the "Cult of Democracy on The March".

How many sick people in this country who'll never survive long enough to get Hospice care?

These fuckers don't care about "life" unless it's "life" that's incapable of running on it's own without heroic outside intervention. "Can't survive without a placenta, ventilator, or 'feeding tube', hey, we're the GOP, we're your Champion!"

Doing somewhat OK, maybe just need some health care, or better Armour? FUCK you, get outta here!

And 48% of Hoosiers just lap this shit up because it's wrapped in a red/white/blue tortilla with a healthy dollop of Dumbya Bush and Gush Pfleghmball's spunk and a yellow ribbon on top of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'd like a conservative
who embraces "the culture of life" (as though people of varying viewpoints are all secret serial killer wannabes) explain to me how this movement in medicine of "conscience" and "refusal" squares with their belief that everyone is entitled to life - which apparently means from zygote to life support measures.
This new movement, which is taking root in different areas of the county, allows health care professionals refuse to treat a patient for ANY reason if it interferes with their moral beliefs. For instance, a fundamentalist Christian who believes that being gay is a sin can refuse to treat someone with AIDS - and I don't mean long-term - but for ANY reason, which could be highly treatable things like infections or other complications that just require an antibiotic to clear up. An unwed pregnant woman who needs medical intervention for whatever reason could be refused treatment because she isn't married. The sinning is endless so the reasons could be as well! And what if "moral" grounds really are financial grounds? With the number of uninsured people in this country, that can't be dismissed as a potential problem in these cases.
These laws are allowing people who are supposed to be commited to healing make moral judgements about whether a patient is worthy of their care. That is so just wrong.
Pharmacists in some states can refuse to fill a script if they feel it's morally wrong. Of course, it's mostly affecting women and their access to birth control and emergency contraception because the abortion issue is behind much of this.
It seems to me that health care workers should have decided upon another profession knowing that sometimes they might have to treat patients or do things for patients that they are opposed to on moral grounds.
But where is the culture of life in a doctor, pharmacist or other health care worker refusing to treat a sick patient for ANY reason if it could imperil that person's health or cause death?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. kick to combine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. Political Battle in Schiavo Case Rages On
good for Kennedy for making his point!!

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20050401/ap_on_go_co/schiavo_politics&sid=84439559

Political Battle in Schiavo Case Rages On

1 minute ago


By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON - In death as much as in life, political controversy surrounds Terri Schiavo. "The actions on the part of the Florida court and the U.S. Supreme Court are unconscionable," Sen. Rick Santorum (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa., said Thursday, attacking judges who repeatedly had refused to order tube-fed nourishment restored to the brain-damaged woman.


"This loss happened because our legal system did not protect the people who need protection most, and that will change," House Majority Leader Tom DeLay added in a statement issued hours after Schiavo's death at a Florida hospice.......


DeLay complained of "an arrogant and out of control judiciary that thumbs its nose at Congress and the president."


"I'm not sure what Mr. DeLay meant when he said 'the time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior,'" the Massachusetts Democrat said in a written statement. "But at a time when emotions are running high, Mr. DeLay needs to make clear that he is not advocating violence against anyone."
..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. No, Rick, the only thing "unconscionable" is you being a Senator.
Fortunately, we get to fix that real soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC