Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil tops $55 a barrel level

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 09:22 AM
Original message
Oil tops $55 a barrel level
Oil tops $55 a barrel level; Goldman ups price outlook By Ciara Linnane
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Crude-oil futures climbed back above the $55 a barrel level in premarket trade Thursday, extending the prior session's late gains, after Goldman Sachs raised its oil price outlook. "We believe oil prices have entered the early stages of a superspike period," said analyst Arjun Murti, who raised his superspike range to $50-105 a barrel from $50-80. Investors are also awaiting the release of weekly natural gas supply data. The crude contract for May delivery was last trading up 2 percent at $55.09 a barrel. May natural gas was up 1.1 percent at $7.55 per million British thermal units. Enercast analysts are expecting the Energy Department to report a withdrawal of 49 billion cubic feet.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/newsfinder/pulseone.asp?siteid=mktw&guid=
{58510034-772F-421F-A133-B270CE138CD4}&dist=bnb

Holy shite! $105 a barrel? I better go buy a good bike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Holy shite! $105 a barrel? I better go buy a good bike."
Better Prepare For The Second Great Depression Instead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, there's PLENTY of oil..................
and we'll kill anyone who stands in our way of getting it. It's called "The Bush Doctrine". So gas up those Hummers and drive like there's no tomorrow. There may not be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes.
Also, HE WHO HOLDS THE OIL HOLDS THE POWER. That's all that's necessary to rule the world.

You have a wrench and a spigot, and you control energy. Energy is power. Power is life. Oil is the essence of life.

That's why they're so afraid of Hugo Chavez. Chavez has more power than Washington right now, and they know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernboy Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. a real kick (in the gas) eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Boy I'm glad I got rid of that gas hog of a car I had
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. "a good bike"
how much would a "good" bike cost? i never thought about getting one until i read that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. About $500-1000
I would go with a Cannondale or a Trek (These are the best American Made bikes today). Europe has some better bikes but the difference is less minor.

Please stay away from low end "High Tensile" Steel bikes, you will see the difference in pedaling once you try a high end bike, (i.e. Chrome Molybdenum Steel or Aluminum bike). People tend to not realize that you can lose up to 70% of your pedaling power in the frame of a bike. The only way to minimize this lost is to go with the stiffest bike frame you can get. In order of Stiffest the list goes this way:

1. High Tension Steel, the wonder material of 1900, it is a very flexible material easy to repair, but not very stiff and as such harder to pedal than the following materials:

2. Chrome Molybdenum Steel (Cr-Mo or Chrome-Moly), the wonder steel of the 1930s. Chrome-Moly is a huge jump in stiffness compared to High Tension steel. So large a jump that almost all of your racing bikes have been of this material from the 1930s till today (Aluminum and Carbon Fiber are slowly pushing Cr-Mo out but Chrome-Moly is still holding its own in the market even at the high end racing market). It is still a good material and the lowest level of Material I would go with in a bike.

3. Aluminum, the wonder bike material of the 1980s. Stiffer than even Chrome Moly light weight and strong. Cannondale dominates this material (Cannondale starts at about $700 and goes up, you can get cheaper Chinese made Aluminum bikes but the quality is not up to the standards of Cannondale, through I have heard good things of Giant Bicycles, A Chinese Brand.

4. Titanium the wonder Material of the 1990s, even stiffer and stronger than Aluminum, but expensive compared to Aluminum. Had a big push in the early to mid 1990s and than slowly faded away as the price of Aluminum dropped and Titanium increased since about 1995. Titanium bikes go for $800-1500 JUST FOR THE FRAMES (With parts add another $500-1000 dollars).

5. Carbon Fiber, the wonder material of the last ten years. Stiffer and lighter than Aluminum and Titanium, but expensive (Going Price abut $3000).

Piece of Advice, buy the best FRAME you can, you can always replace the components with better parts, but the Frame is the base you are struck with. Most companies sell their top notch frames with Cheap Components thus the $500-800 bikes, knowing that you will upgrade the parts over the next few years.

Advice as to Front and Rear Shocks. Rear shocks are design to help the back wheel stay on the ground while you are racing over hills (Notice I did NOT say dirt road, when I say hill I mean hills). Thus unless you plan to go cross-country (i.e. even avoiding Dirt Roads) you do NOT need a rear shock, in fact it reduces the stiffest of the Frame so it will make it harder to pedal. Thus for commuting I do not recommend rear shocked bikes.

As to front shocks, as a general rule NOT needed, but given it is in the front you do not have the increase pedaling penalty caused by Rear Shocks (The near to be able to steer works against making the front end to stiff). I do not think front Shocks are worth the extra weight such shocks weigh compared to non-shock absorbing front forks, but if the bike I like has one it would NOT be grounds in my mind NOT to take the bike (Unlike Rear Shocks which you should avoid if you are using the bike for commuting).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Terri Schiavo , Terri Schiavo ,Terri Schiavo ,
Michael Jackson, La La La La La... No story here, guys. Move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC