Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jury Says New Orleans DA Guilty of Bias (against whites)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 08:46 PM
Original message
Jury Says New Orleans DA Guilty of Bias (against whites)
NEW ORLEANS Mar 30, 2005 — New Orleans' first black district attorney discriminated against 43 whites when he fired them en masse and replaced them with blacks upon taking office in 2003, a federal jury decided Wednesday. The jury awarded the employees about $1.8 million in back pay and damages.

The jury made up of eight whites and two blacks returned the unanimous verdict in the third day of deliberations in the racial discrimination case against District Attorney Eddie Jordan.

Jordan acknowledged he wanted to make the office more reflective of the city's racial makeup, but denied he fired whites just because they are white. In fact, he said, he did not know the race of the people fired.

Under U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval's instructions, jurors had to find Jordan liable if they concluded the firings were racially motivated. The law bars the mass firing of a specific group, even if the intent is to create diversity.
....
"We thought the facts as well as the law favored us. I still maintain that I did not use race as a factor in my hiring practices," he said.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=627411&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. This idiot
came into office and unilatterally fired every single ADA on staff. It disruptted coutless cases, resulted in many criminals walking free, and was a general disaster for law enforcement in New Orleans.

I don't know that it was racially biased, but it was a dumbass manouver. If he really felt it was needed to insure racial diversity, he should have at least retained the DA's through the end of their open cases. Murder's went free because of this idiot.

Yes, I have personal knowledge of this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. At the time
it read as if it was a neophyte (newbie to this type of position - and not thinking through the actions of doing this so broad sweepingly.)

Sorry that the reprecussions sound as if they were far greater than what oft is the case with big early blunders of new office holders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC