Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Annan defiant over his son's links to oil-for-food scheme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:18 AM
Original message
Annan defiant over his son's links to oil-for-food scheme
Independent
By David Usborne in New York
30 March 2005


Kofi Annan's position as secretary general of the United Nations was further undermined after investigators said he failed to take sufficient action in 1999 when he found out that a company that had employed his son for several years had been awarded a big contract to oversee the oil-for-food programme in Iraq.

In its latest interim report yesterday, the committee investigating claims of corruption in the programme said it had found insufficient evidence to show Kojo Annan's connection to the firm in question, Cotecna Inspections, had skewed the bidding process that led to it being awarded the contract.

"There is no evidence that the selection of Cotecna in 1998 was subject to any affirmative or improper influence of the secretary general," Paul Volcker, former US Federal Reserve chairman, said. Mr Annan released a statement last night saying the inquiry had "cleared me of any wrongdoing".

But the cloud that the affair has cast over the secretary general will not be easily dispersed. Mr Annan was fully aware his son was working for Cotecna. What the investigators could not prove was that he knew the firm was competing for the oil-for-food programme in late 1998. He told investigators he only learned that Cotecna had sought and indeed won the contract from press reports in January 1999.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=624673
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's damn thin grounds to condemn him.
I mean, just on the idea that because he found out his son worked for the company that meant that the company traded on his son's (and therefore his own) name to get that contract. How would he know this? Paranoia? Well, yes!

In an ideal world that would be enough but, those are thin grounds indeed to demand Annan's head. Big disappointment for the kill-the-UN crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Annan learns well. Takes a page out of Bush/Rove book! It's called
by the RW being "strong" "confident" "consistent" "firm" and even being a "great leader."

Now all he has to do is tell them to go "f**K themselves and he will gain the admiration that Cheney gained on the Senate floor.

Boy, are American hypocritical, or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. The "Cloud" Was Fabricated By Unseen Evidence That Halabi (The Spy)
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 10:46 AM by cryingshame
supposedly had on his computer but refused to divulge.

That's right- this all started from words out of the mouth of that upstanding Iraqi citizen Ahmed Chalabi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, if this is the new standard for corruption . . .
Then what are we to make of no-bid government contracts handed out to a corporation that isn't competent to deliver the goods and services called for in that contract, which was teetering on the verge of bankruptcy before the fortuitous event of a trumped-up war, and one of whose former executives just happens to be the Vice President of the United States, who continues to receive compensation from that company, and that same company is shown to have overcharged recklessly for the services it has performed as well as charged for goods not delivered and services not performed?

I know, I know. Off to Gitmo with me for rememberin' stuff and askin' questions. No turkee for gratuitous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC