Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Consider Slowing Benefits Growth for Most -NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 10:14 AM
Original message
Republicans Consider Slowing Benefits Growth for Most -NYT
Can "progressive indexation" help sell President Bush's plan to overhaul Social Security?

Though he has been loath to propose specific measures to reduce future benefits, Mr. Bush and other officials are gingerly promoting the idea as a way to cut costs and still protect low-income retirees.

Supporters of "progressive indexation" say it could achieve several goals: it would eliminate a big part of Social Security's long-running financial gap; it would guarantee benefits at current levels and allow them to rise in real terms for people at the bottom of the income ladder.
...
In terms of purchasing power, benefits would not decline. But because wages tend to rise faster than prices do, analysts estimate that benefits would fall far behind increases in the standard of living.

Benefits promised to people who retire in 50 years would be about half as large as benefits promised under current law. Instead of replacing about 40 percent of pre-retirement income for a median-income worker, as is the case today, Social Security benefits would replace only 21.5 percent of earnings for a person who retired in 2065, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/25/politics/25social.html?ex=1269406800&en=af51441cff29d10f&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. bull shit
anything these bastards come up with to "help the people at the bottom of the income ladder" is just another plan to screw them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockerdem Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Huh?? Theyve been wanting to do that for a long time.
One strategem for the GOP has been to turn SS into another welfare program for the poor. They feel that most Americans would drop their heavy support for it, thereby driving a wedge into it, killing it eventually. They already have a wedge between the younger and the older. Beware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. WTF "But because wages tend to rise faster than prices do"
On what planet does that happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Disinformation
Get rid of the $90,000 salary cap, roll back the tax cuts--crisis over!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is that like the whatchamacolit is attached to the whosit?
And if under a blue moon on the 29th of february a blue billed herring eats a worm your benefits will go up.So as Bush says "It's all good."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. …
Edited on Fri Mar-25-05 11:35 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC