Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

14 Dems break rank (vote with Rs) to end debate on bankruptcy bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:49 PM
Original message
14 Dems break rank (vote with Rs) to end debate on bankruptcy bill
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 05:52 PM by BlueInRed
Political strategy reports that a bunch of Dems broke ranks to end debate on the bankruptcy bill. Here are the Ds who voted with the Rs to end debate (and thus clear the way for passing the bill):

Biden (D-DE), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Salazar (D-CO), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea

They have more info on this over at http://www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/001214.php .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Traitors One And All - They Are Now On My Permanent DINO List
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. what does DINO mean?
i grasp the meaning, but don't have it exactly. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Democrat In Name Only
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
202. Read my lips: Most rich people don't give a damn about the working poor.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwantmycountryback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Yeah Robert Byrd's a real DINO
*rolls eyes* I don't agree with his vote right here but be serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
71. fine then explain his vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #71
133. I think it's obvious...
...anyone of them who get money from the Credit Card lobby, will go this way and vote for the legislation. I remember reading an article somewhere discussing this 'political whoring' for a big local state industry no matter how liberal the Senator is. Someone really ought to push through campaign finance reform, or at least better campaign finance reform (ie: no Corporate or Union donations -- make it all individual and put limits on that). I don't think it will happen though, but it should be an issue that's addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #133
138. McCain & Feingold are working on a new bill
but I don't know what it includes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #138
148. unless the new bill provides for public funding it is not worth shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #148
189. I think we need to give free air time
We own the airwaves, but we have no control. Pols fool around with rules for DECENCY, yet we have to pay for commercials to try & get a fair election?

It's all about the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #189
201. money and power you got it Leilani
it is why the middle class has not seen their standard of living increase in three decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #133
177. Force them to disclose all donations on a public web page
Give them 24 hours to post any and all donations they receive to this publicly accessible page. Make them give the amount and who it came from. Then watch what happens when people realize who is really running this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
purduejake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #177
188. I think they already know their people receive lots of corporate money.
But most of the repukes don't care and vote against their interests just so they can have people in office who attack women, blacks, gays, you name it. They are truly sick people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manly Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #177
192. "Force them to disclose all donations on a public web page"
What an excellent idea. Therefore there's no way will this ever get enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
115. How much money did they get from the credit card
Comapnies?? I would say these are bought and paid for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
157. NO to Biden in '08
Over my dead body will he become our nominee. Hell, I'd rather have HILLARY over him.


http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues/507794
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manly Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #157
194. NO to Biden
Biden is a real hypocrite. His left hand doesn't know what his left hand is doing, but it's under the table, so we can't see it either. I wouldn't vote for him for dogcatcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Et Tu, Byrd?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I just double checked that and yes, Byrd
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 06:06 PM by BlueInRed
I am surprised by this. As I am with Stabenow and Kohl. Very disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
142. Kohl owns a string of department stores
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 05:48 AM by saigon68
That need credit cards to keep going


http://www.kohls.com/main/home.jsp




I hope he chokes on his own Bile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #142
172. Kohl no longer part of Kohl's

His family *did* strt it but
they sold their stake 23-odd years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
164. my letter to Debbie Stabenow
Senator:
I noted you voted in favor of the new Bankruptcy bill recently. This is unbelievable to me, a life long Democrat. Are you now supporting the big money interests? I can only assume so.
My checkbook will stay in my pocket when next you ask for cash. I might even decide not to vote for you based on this.
It appears you've sold out on this bill - to the detriment of most of your constituents (the ones who can't write you checks for millions).
How sad.

And she's up for re-election - hope she loses, after this, even if it means a real Republican. We simply cannot have this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #164
167. My Letter to Her
Senator Stabenow, I am frankly shocked and dismayed by your actions concerning the recent bankruptcy bill in Senate.

Credit card companies spent millions of dollars to screw over the poorest, the weakest, and the most voiceless among us, and by allowing that to happen you are complicit. You are responsible for a "reverse Robin Hood" -- assailing the poor to help the rich. There is positively NO EXCUSE for the miserably bad decision you made.

In late 2001/early 2002, after a combination of a lost job due to Bush's mismanagement of the employment market, nosediving investments due to Bush's bungling of the economy, and loss of home due to both of the above, I moved back in with my parents and fought to scrape together enough money to file for bankruptcy. I was one of the lucky ones -- having received a discharge of debt, I have maintained financial stability. Now that I am back on my feet financially, I repeatedly refuse the predatory credit card offers I continue to receive. I am credit-card-free and intend to stay that way. I am now living fairly comfortably on my own, am just months away from completely paying off my student loans (which were not discharged), and even have enough money for modest savings. Without the safety valve of bankruptcy, it's impossible to know where I would be right now.

It pains me to write this letter, as I have always been proud to call Governor Granholm my governor and Carl Levin and yourself my senators. But your actions regarding this bankruptcy bill offend me on a very personal level. If you had your way a few years earlier, I shudder to think what my living situation would be like today.

I sincerely hope whatever the credit card companies and financial institutions paid you for your soul was worth it to you. I have lost all respect for you and your office.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #167
168. Your letter is terrific
My view: let her lose next year. I will campaign against her - telling my fellow liberals to vote for the 3rd party candidates. We need to go down fighting, not licking the offal left by the GOP. And of course, Debby the Turncoat's opponent will be funded by the same people she voted for. Amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #167
169. It is terrific, and
I will bet Stabenow will vote against the final bill, after voting to clear the way for it's passage (by voting against the ability to filibuster). So for most people in your state, they will never know she voted to end debate and to clear the way for the bill's passage. Sad.

I hope your letter will get published in a newspaper or other public forum. People deserve to know the details of this kind of situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #169
207. How true. Her vote against it later won't matter.
What mattered, mattered NOW. She's a WHORE. Bought and paid for. Just like Biden, et al.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #164
220. Might decide not to vote for her? I'd definitely not vote for her..
.. there is really no excuse for this vote. How could it have any type of positive effect on the people she is supposed to be serving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Byrd was one of only two D's to vote against the abortion ammendment... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
67. maybe Byrd is just having a bad hair day. the amend got 46 votes
which isn't bad, but still a very real loss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
82. I thought he was pro-choice
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spock_is_Skeptical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
124. my thoughts exactly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. one party govt
at its finest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. it's no wonder the democrats have lost all control of government
since they act like Republican lite or one big party called the
corporate party.

How I wish, even if just a few, we had a party in congress that
actually represented the people and never backed down or did stuff
like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourStarDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
147. And 45 million people still don't have health insurance.
Next, they will bring back the debtors prisons, and refer the medically impovershished to "faith-based" funded homeless shelters. They'll probrably call that another 'reform'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. The six that voted for torturer Gonzales are all on this list
Lieberman, Salazar, Nelson, Nelson, Landrieu and Pryor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. Gee, Lieberman, what a surprise.
:eyes:

What a turd blossom and an asshat, to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
74. Florida's Bill Nelson
you're kidding me?!!! /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pie Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Byrd AND Kohl?
What the fuck are these men thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Someone said Byrd sometimes votes for cloture but against the bill
So that he can be on-record that he voted against it.

Let's wait and see, but I'm not hopeful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trapper914 Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
158. You May Be On To Something
It could be that Byrd, Biden, et al voted for cloture just to get to the up/down vote, eliminating the "obstructionist" cries from the right. Then, when the bill passes without their votes, they can use it against the Republicans in 2006 and 2008. Keep in mind, the biggest bankruptcy states are Red states. The biggest reason for bankruptcy is due to out of control medical expenses (can you say affordable health care...a Dem position). This cloture vote could be key in winning back a seat or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #158
208. Their later votes against it won't matter, because they know it PASSES
Their SPINES were MIA when it mattered. Voting to cut off debate was the death knell for the opposition, and they fucking knew it.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
182. That is my question too.
I need a list of actual VOTES, up/down, on this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #182
210. I think this is what you are looking for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #210
221. Yes, thank you. I did go dig up the info on who did what....
Edited on Fri Mar-11-05 12:00 AM by Sugarbleus
Furthermore I watched the Senate this morning as they debated Kennedy's proposals for this bill. I continued to watch in stunned silence as Biden voted NAY on the new language for this bill as it pertains to single mother's/child support et al.

What, pray tell, is Biden's trip!!??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
183. Cloture is the whole ball game
The republican majority cannot be stopped after cloture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lizzie Borden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. My resonse too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pie Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
104. I'm not sure whether to cry or puke or get drunk
I just don't get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #104
184. Get drunk! Then if you cry or puke you won't mind as much. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
68. Kohl can be wishy washy at time. glad i do not see Feingold on this list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
95. Kohl = Kohl Department Stores = Kohl Credit Cards
Byrd seems to only be progressive on war issues. Other than that . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mills Street Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #95
153. I don't believe Kohl owns the stores anymore N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hebegirl Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
222. I knew Salazar would be Rethug Lite
It's a damn shame, too. Because Mike Miles won the top of the Colorado Senate Primary ticket, but the DINOs in the state party (the same ones who blocked Dean nationally), wouldn't support him, and Salazar got the nomination. You should hear all the "warnings" we are now receiving in this state, about the "jihad" (I swear, that is how it was written in a local newspaper article last weekend) that the Mike Miles supporters initiated-- by voting in a new state party chairperson. PULEEEZE!!!!
The "warnings" all center around the Miles contingent "moving the party to the Left," etc etc which really means moving it back AWAY from rethug -lite which is squarely Salazar's camp. Maybe Pete Coors (talk about your Fortunate Son) would have won against Miles. I think I would have preferred that to this turncoat lite . If Salazar, Byrd, Biden or Lieberman - or any of the DINOs-- dares to support Shrub's social insecurity plan- I hope there is hell to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #222
225. Good info on why we need the new chairperson. F*ck Salazar
I will never vote for this thug again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Writting Big Ben Nelson did alot
I can't wait for his return letter explaining his vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. Tell me, did you honestly expect some other action from good ol Ben?
He voted just like he always does, for his corporate buddies and his republican pals against the people who make up his party.

Ben Nelson is a walking shit heap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #42
85. I think he's scared out of his wits by getting beat
in the next election. In some ways I can't blame him, but at some point you've got to wonder if it's worth being Senator if you can't vote how you want to. I really don't know if he's in someone's pocket. I want to believe he's not. I think he's first of all - a very conservative democrat and second - overly scared of not being re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trish1168 Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Losers!
I wish they'd pay attention to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tubbacheez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Anyone know when each of their terms are up for reelection?
The early ones will make great examples for the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
111. From Project Vote Smart
http://www.vote-smart.org/

Biden (D-DE), Yea - 2008
Byrd (D-WV), Yea - 2006
Carper (D-DE), Yea - 2006
Conrad (D-ND), Yea - 2006
Johnson (D-SD), Yea - 2008
Kohl (D-WI), Yea - 2006
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea - 2008
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea - 2006
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea - 2010
Nelson (D-FL), Yea - 2006
Nelson (D-NE), Yea - 2006
Pryor (D-AR), Yea - 2008
Salazar (D-CO), Yea - 2010
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea - 2006

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Inscribe their names on the Wall of Shame.
Thanks for nothing, a-holes. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kohl!!
KOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHLLLLL!!!!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks--this is so tragic some humor is needed (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Lol!
OK, I needed that. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It sure looks like Amerika is for a rough time.
Except for the Oligarchy that rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
76. bahahahha
ahahahanice.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
98geoduck Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Did anyone say same shit different pile yet. Third party please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Third? We don't need a third, but having two parties would be nice
instead of just one in which all congressmen listen only to coporate lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
98geoduck Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. great point, it's all such a blurrrrrrr and my eyesight is 15-20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Stabenow?
That suprises me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. Doesn't suprise me.
She's a ditz. I've met her, as she was my state rep and state senator growing up. I even played Equations against one of her bratty sons and performed a story (Forensics) for her and the Rotary club in town when I was in high school. I hate to say it, but I've never been that impressed with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
121. Stabenow finally lost my vote.
She's been a Quisling too often. This obscene legislation preys on the weakest by the wealthiest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
131. That's the one that shocks me.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
166. My Letter to Sen. Stabenow's Office
Senator Stabenow, I am frankly shocked and dismayed by your actions concerning the recent bankruptcy bill in Senate.

Credit card companies spent millions of dollars to screw over the poorest, the weakest, and the most voiceless among us, and by allowing that to happen you are complicit. You are responsible for a "reverse Robin Hood" -- assailing the poor to help the rich. There is positively NO EXCUSE for the miserably bad decision you made.

In late 2001/early 2002, after a combination of a lost job due to Bush's mismanagement of the employment market, nosediving investments due to Bush's bungling of the economy, and loss of home due to both of the above, I moved back in with my parents and fought to scrape together enough money to file for bankruptcy. I was one of the lucky ones -- having received a discharge of debt, I have maintained financial stability. Now that I am back on my feet financially, I repeatedly refuse the predatory credit card offers I continue to receive. I am credit-card-free and intend to stay that way. I am now living fairly comfortably on my own, am just months away from completely paying off my student loans (which were not discharged), and even have enough money for modest savings. Without the safety valve of bankruptcy, it's impossible to know where I would be right now.

It pains me to write this letter, as I have always been proud to call Governor Granholm my governor and Carl Levin and yourself my senators. But your actions regarding this bankruptcy bill offend me on a very personal level. If you had your way a few years earlier, I shudder to think what my living situation would be like today.

I sincerely hope whatever the credit card companies and financial institutions paid you for your soul was worth it to you. I have lost all respect for you and your office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #166
180. VERY Well Done!!!!!!!!! Dang that was a good one
Good on Ya!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #166
203. Ask her how she would've voted if her divorce had been
earlier in her political career. Her first husband supported her career financially by keeping everything going. If she'd had to go it alone before she was established, like when she was my state senator and not the senator from all of Michigan, there's a good chance she wouldn't have made it financially.

How could she turn her back on the state with the highest unemployment rate just because Ford Credit and GMAC asked her to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
178. Stabenow surprised me too!
I have liked her for her seemingly pro worker stance. Seemed like she had a better grip on the poverty issues that face her district.

How is this bankruptcy bill going to HELP any of that now????? Very disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthSideCubsFan Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. I trust no one is surprised at Biden and Carper
knowing how many credit card companies are headquartered in Delaware.

Remember that these folks are all politicians first, Democrats second. Most Repugs are the same way. Money talks, bullshit walks......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. They suck!
debtors beware!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Elsicko's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Here after these Dems should be known as "FTP DEMS"
You have your DINOs...you have your pseudo-Dems...now, we have clear evidence of a new moniker...the Fuck The Poor Dems (aka. FTP Dems).

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
98geoduck Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. file transfer protocal fits as well. Great acronym!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. "And any senator who votes for the bill should be ashamed. " -Krugman
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 06:48 PM by Rose Siding
This wasn't a vote on the actual bill, but dang it's hard to watch.

Warren Buffett recently made headlines by saying America is more likely to turn into a "sharecroppers' society" than an "ownership society." But I think the right term is a "debt peonage" society - after the system, prevalent in the post-Civil War South, in which debtors were forced to work for their creditors. The bankruptcy bill won't get us back to those bad old days all by itself, but it's a significant step in that direction.

And any senator who votes for the bill should be ashamed.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/08/opinion/08krugman.html?hp


Wealthy Senators will never worry about bankruptcy.

Ka-ching go the campaign coffers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
116. This bill is big step in the direction of the "sharecropper society"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
31. Th Bigger Problem
The problem is not a senator that occassionally votes for something that affects their state or their political situation, like Byrd or Kohl.

The Bigger Problem are the five or six "Democrats" that are consistently voting to empower the Bush Reich: Lieberman, Salazar, Nelson, Nelson, Landrieu and Pryor.

Lieberman should be the target ... Please, oh please ... let there be a primary challenger to 'Slow Joe' in Connecticut for the 2006 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebeaglehaslanded Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Add Feinstein to your list
Diane Feinstein (DINO - CA) must have been absent or we would expect to see her name on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Actually, Feinstein voted against cloture (with the Ds)
Click the link in the post, then the link in the article. It takes you to the full vote list, yea and nay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #40
165. Wonder what's up with that, she usually votes with the Kool Aid Crowd
Whenever she gets a chance :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
72. Watch the Dino Six
They could be the key votes for the passage of Bush's Social Security Reform. If they do vote for Bush's gutting of Social Security then they deserve to be drummed out the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #72
99. If they vote to gut SS,
...Then they would deserve to be tarred & feathered before they are run out of the Democratic party.:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. If they vote to gut SS, I'm sure Howard Dean would show them the door
out of the party. I don't trust them. I think that they may roll on the SSR. It makes you wonder what Rove has on them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
32. Biden is a JERK, Lieberman is a Traitor
Biden and Lieberman may as well join the republican party. Can't these people ever be unified against the republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
113. No, of course they cannot....
They're complacent in all the crimes that these crooks are committing each and every day that passes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
117. I suggested to Carper he may want to switch parties
since he keeps riding the fence or voting with the Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
35. Traitors! I hate Lieberman the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
36. Democrats are your friends!
They believe in hard work and ethical standards...BAHAHAHA...just kidding. In truth they are greedy, rich bastards!!! Well the ones who care about making politics their bread and butter for life. How many would that be?

Okay, here's the deal...they laugh all the way to the bank same as Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. Our Dem Senators are completely worthless
They are rich and they intend to stay that way at OUR expense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm a lifelong dem, but i just don't now how much longer i will be
It's to the point where our reps just don't represent us at all. The only dems with any guts left are dean, boxer and reid (reid so far).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwareOne Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. Our experiment in democracy is a decided failure,
It's every man for himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #38
159. There is no more Democratic party, unless Dean can do something. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
39. Just stay on the side of the aisle
so we can figure out who our true allies are. I'm sick of getting sold out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. Only freshman D on this list voting yes
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 06:58 PM by confludemocrat
Why does Ken Salazar's name continue to be attached to nearly every cave to the Bush agenda? Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Salazar is a good example of the party leadership choosing for us.
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 07:50 PM by madfloridian
Mike Miles would have been a real fighter, I think. But the party would not hear of it.

Salazar won, but look how he votes?

We have the same problem in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
70. I'll pipe in here to say..you
are so right about Mike Miles..glad you brought his name up, madflor..

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
44. they should never, ever have done this.
this is a crime.

how can dems make anything out of the party with a crew like this?
it doesn't stop.

maybe they will vote against the bill when it comes to the floor -- will that make difference to it's passage?
not if this presages the end result.

it's hard to believe that this party isn't in need of serious warning or event that shakes them to the soles of their boots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
47. End debate on the bankruptcy bill so we can get on with the next retreat
from our supposed values and of those who made the party what it once was: a builder of the nation's slow steady progress toward real justice. Sleep well rich assholes and gutless wimps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. A pipe dream, but a solution would to back other dems that face these
dems in their primaries. Get these people out. Get other dems to challenge them, back them and get new dems in. we need to send a message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
49. and people on here want Lincoln to run for president
gods, just goes to show how little difference there is between the Democrats and the Republicans

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
50. Bayh voted 'No' - is he moving Left before a 2008 run for Pres?
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 07:27 PM by suziedemocrat
I've been paying more attention to Bayh's votes lately - and he votes along with my wishes a lot. I have only recently been watching him - but everyone says he is so far right. Either he is moving left or he was always more to the left than I was led to believe. If he's moving left - could it be to position himself for 2008?

edit typo in header.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #50
151. You are correct.
I posted a link to an article about it yesterday in GD Politics.

Looks like he's going for it for sure.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1644282
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #151
190. Thanks!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
51. Correct me if I am wrong but this is the end of the game. The chance
to filibuster was this vote that just came and went right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. yep that's correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Well I work in the area and we are already brainstorming ways to
deal with it. And we will probably figure out ways to make even more money off this mess. And the middle class will get fucked. Good job Senate. My only criticism is that now the MBNA Whores will have used up their raison d'etre to receive CC company influence payments. Maybe they can keep up their usefulness by working on legislation that will preempt any remaining state usury statutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Economic populism is what Dems (used to) do, but chance thrown away here.
This was a no brainer actually as far as taking a stand in defense of the common people. WHY IS THAT SO DAMN HARD TO DO FOR THESE PEOPLE ON THIS LIST, many from poor or struggling states? I live in rural area where many will be harmed by this and know there would be no penalty (even to their overcautious frame of thought) to pay among these rural white poor folk, however conservative socially, for fighting it every step of the way, filibuster included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Byrd and Pryor were surprising
I don't know. Did any of them read the bill? This legislation will be the most hurtful, of all the other hurtful things, that Congress and this President have done to the middle class. Did any of them explain their support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hezekkia Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #63
80. ok
maybe someone can explain to me why this bill is such an affront to Democratic values? I agree it should close loopholes for the rich who abuse bankruptcy-- indeed, that would be my priority. Fix THAT before anything else.

but still--maybe i'm old-fashioned-- I just don't see the problem of making people repay money that's been lent to them (at least so long as they're able to). this doesn't seem like the high-treason that some of y'all are suggesting.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. There are a myriad of things wrong with the bill
that get at the heart of Democratic values,
but here are some brief lowlights:

go here
http://www.airamericaradio.com/weblogs/alfrankenshow/

and then to this section:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE DAILY "AL FRANKEN SHOW" AUDIO HIGHLIGHT


Al Franken chats with Harvard Law professor, Elizabeth Warren about what the cast and crew of the “The Al Franken Show” likes to call the “Moral Bankruptcy Bill”.  Listen here.

Posted by AudioGuy on 03/08 at 01:23 PM  •  Comments: (5) • Trackbacks: (0) • Permalink
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uhhuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. Ok, It's like this:
There is no protection given to people who have credit bills due to catastrophic medical emergencies, lose a job, or are otherwise situated.

Credit companies can demand that you sell any assests, including your primary residence, unless you meet a very stringent "means test" that is very prohibitive.

It discourages entreprenuership by not affording small business owners protection against losing everything if they try and fail in stating a home or small business with their own credit.
It allows credit companies to not state clearly what the maximum interest rate is for credit. It also allows them to raise the rate whenever they feel like it.

Forcing most people into Chapter 13 bankruptcy hurts everyone except the lenders.

Some who is required to put every spare dollar into debt repayment, rather that taking care of their families' needs, or using it to BUY stuff that supports the economy hurts everyone.
They will not be able to get a fresh start, or retrain or afford to go back to school to improve their situation because they will be required to spend ANY non-essential income on debt repayment.

The credit companies made record profits last year, and the rate of loss due to non payment has not gone up in 30 years.

It is the most lender friendly, anti consumer peice of crap that has ever been devised.

Does that help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. Beautifully put
I am a hunt and peck typist and that would have taken me a half-hour to type up and get right. Thanks. And that it was that easy for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uhhuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #89
103. Thanks
I hunt and peck too, but I'm getting good at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #86
97. AAAAAAAND
there is already provisions that denies bankruptcy to abusive credit holders, so this is just helping credit card companies predate even more on the helpless and unfortunate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hezekkia Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #86
112. can you show me some support for this:
>>Credit companies can demand that you sell any assests, including your primary residence


I haven't been able to find that anywhere. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #112
114. I am unaware of homestead exemptions being impacted by the bill.
Though the forcing of ppl into 13's will reduce income available to service mortgages and lead to more defaults and foreclosures. Income will be reduced by Chapter 13 payments, or for those unable to start or complete thirteens due to prohibitive transaction costs, wage garnishment. Keep looking for the silver lining. The only ppl that will benefit from this will be smart aggressive lawyers like me and MBNA et al. Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #112
212. About losing homes...here you go
This diary lists many of the rejected amendedments...it is appalling, inexplicable. But as far as homes...

http://logan5.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/6/63144/06015

Continuing on, a very, very important amendment:

02-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 17
Feingold Amdt. No. 17.; To provide a homestead floor for the elderly.
REJECTED

This is a truly outrageous rejection. Allow us to explain as succinctly as we can:

Each and every Republican Senator, along with Jeffords (I) and Democrats Biden, Carper and Nelson, voted to reject a provision that would ensure that no elderly people in enough financial trouble to seek bankruptcy protection would lose their homes.

Here's how the debate went down, in a nutshell:

"In States such as Florida and Texas, there is a homestead exemption with an unlimited dollar value, meaning that any money invested in a home cannot be obtained by creditors. I should note, of course, that this creates other problems, which I will address in a few minutes. But other States allow a very limited value homestead exemption. In many States, the amount of equity a homeowner can protect in bankruptcy has lagged far behind the dramatic rise in home values in recent years. For example, in the State of Ohio, the homestead exemption is only $5,000, and in the Presiding Officer's State of North Carolina, the homestead exemption is $10,000. In this day and age, those paltry exemptions will do no good. We obviously have a problem, and it is hitting our older friends and family members the hardest.
Think about it: In these low homestead exemption States, even indigent elderly homeowners who own a home free and clear worth only $30,000 or $40,000 cannot file for chapter 7 bankruptcy without losing their home.

And they may not be able to file a chapter 13 case because they cannot afford to pay creditors the value of their home equity that is not exempt, as required by that chapter. Many elderly homeowners live solely on Social Security benefits, often no more than $800 to $1,000 per month. This is enough to subsist in their paid-off homes, while still paying taxes, utilities and other basic living expenses. But if they lose their homes, they will not be able to rent a decent place to live. Effectively, this means these older homeowners have no bankruptcy relief available to them at all. We have to address this gross inequity before we pass this bill. My amendment would create a uniform federal floor for homestead exemptions of $75,000, applicable only to bankruptcy debtors over the age of 62, protecting the lower- and middle-class senior citizens who need it most.
<snip>

After Feingold concluded his opening remarks, Orrin Hatch got up and blasted Feingold's amendment as an attempt to derail the entire bill and an infringement on the States' Rights regarding Homestead Exemptions (claiming the bill would be derailed because this infringement suggested in Feingold's amendment would cause numerous Senators from said States to vote against the Bill. As if any of those 55 Republican automatons would EVER vote against a bill if they were told to vote FOR it?)

Did you catch what just happened there? Orrin Hatch's problem with the amendment is that Feingold's amendment would have impacted on the "millionare homestead" laws in Florida and Texas, which allow estates of unlimited value to be kept by wealthy businessmen even if after declare bankruptcy. The laws have caused controversy in the past for the obvious reasons -- corporate officers responsible for criminal, fraudulent, or simply negligent behaviors by their companies (think WorldCom) can pump an unlimited amount of money into their own property, and that property then cannot be touched in bankruptcy proceedings



Here are some other rejected amendments noted in the article:
03-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 42
Schumer Amdt. No. 42; To limit the exemption for asset protection trusts.
REJECTED

What does that mean? Here's the translation: Sen. Schumer (D) wanted to limit the free ride given in this Republican-sponsored legislation to people who are rich enough to put their assets in a "protected trust".

Laws inspired by the Enron debacle may hold the officers of a corporation personally liable for the deceptive financial practices, and ensuing disasters, of their corporation. However -- luckily for prospective corporate criminals -- there are in the United States a handful of states, such as Utah, where you may stash your assets in a "protected trust" and render them untouchable by bankruptcy laws -- and you don't have to be a resident of those states to take advantage of those laws.

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, while purporting to strengthen bankruptcy laws against abuse, specifically provides exemptions for those asset protection trusts. Schumer's Amendment 42 was an attempt to close that loophole.

03-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 49
Durbin Amdt. No. 49; To protect employees and retirees from corporate practices that deprive them of their earnings and retirement savings when a business files for bankruptcy.
REJECTED

03-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 38
Durbin Amdt. No. 38; To discourage predatory lending practices.
REJECTED

03-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 37
Nelson (FL) Amdt. No. 37; To exempt debtors from means testing if their financial problems were caused by identity theft.
REJECTED

03-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 31
Dayton Amdt. No. 31.; To limit the amount of interest that can be charged on any extension of credit to 30 percent.
REJECTED

02-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 32
Corzine Amdt. No. 32; To preserve existing bankruptcy protections for individuals experiencing economic distress as caregivers to ill or disabled family members.
REJECTED

02-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 28
Kennedy Amdt. No. 28.; To exempt debtors whose financial problems were caused by serious medical problems from means testing.
REJECTED

02-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 29
Kennedy Amdt. No. 29; To provide protection for medical debt homeowners.
REJECTED

02-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 15
Akaka Amdt. No. 15; To require enhanced disclosure to consumers regarding the consequences of making only minimum required payments in the repayment of credit card debt, and for other purposes.
REJECTED

01-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 16
Durbin Amdt. No. 16, As Modified.; To protect service members and veterans from means testing in bankruptcy, to disallow certain claims by lenders charging usurious interest rates to service members, and to allow service members to exempt property based on the law of the State of their premilitary residence.
REJECTED

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trapper914 Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #86
160. And Don't Forget
The bill protects lawbreakers' assets should they be fined e.g. violent abortion protestors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #80
109. If you really want to know why its an awful bill (from anyone's
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 10:38 PM by madmark
perspective, democratic or republican) read the letter attached below I sent to Kennedy outlining the worst features. But now its about to become. And I am going to figure out how to make even more money on it than I am right now under current law. And when someone like you goes belly up, we are going to make more money on you. And MBNA et al is going to make more money on you. And you, and the rest of the middle class gets fucked. And America gets weaker. Good job Senate. Good job MBNA whores.

Letter Attachment:

Dear Senator Kennedy,

I apologize for being a non-constituent taking up your time but I wanted to be heard on the bankruptcy bill. I am concerned that my two republican senators maybe unresponsive and its my understanding that you have taken the lead opposing what is in my view awful legislation.

I work as a bankruptcy practitioner and below is a letter I sent my senators setting forth some of my substantive concerns about the bill. I am attaching it for any use you feel fit. The bill is bad enough, and its effects will be so sweeping, immediate, and dire for the middle class, that I believe this bill may merit a filibuster and I do not think I am overstating the matter. Please consider using this device to challenge the bill or at least to put some sunlight on it (the media has done almost nothing as to its negative consequences). Thank you for your consideration of this matter. The letter with the substantive points is as follows:

Dear Senator McCain,

I am one of your constituents and have practiced bankruptcy law for the past 12 years here in Phoenix. Before you vote to pass the bankruptcy bill could you please do two things: 1)Read this bill, and 2) Speak to at least one of Arizona's bankruptcy judges (preferably a republican one so that they have more credibility in your eyes) about the bill's merits. If you can still vote for the bill after you have read it and spoken to one of our judges then you have at least done the bare mininum diligence that this decision requires. I suspect though if you actually read the bill and speak to one of our judges about it (not necessarily in that order) you will be unable to vote for it because it is in effect an economic attack on the middle class and will render the bankruptcy courts dysfunctional. I know that may sound like hyperbole but I honestly do not think I am overstating the matter.

In my practice approximately 5% of the bankruptcy cases I see could be characterized as abusive or involving lack of personal responsibility. The balance are caused by the following in descending order: divorce, illness, injury, job layoffs, and entrepreneurial failure. Even Republican Senators during this debate have already described the bill as being "harsh" when applying it to members of the military. Just as the Senate does not think this harsh bill should apply to the military why would they want it to apply to the divorced, ill, injured, layed off and the entrepreneurs who fuel our economy, take the risks that have to be taken for growth to ever occur, and failed in this noble attempt.

I will preview two important provisions in the Bil. The Bill "means tests" the ability of people to file Chapter 7 liquidations and forces everyone except the lower middle class with one income (2 incomes will be too much), the impoverished, and the extremely wealthy to file a Chapter 13 wage earner plan bankruptcy instead of a Chapter 7 liquidation. The Bill also requires that debtor's lawyers assume liability for the accuracy of the Debtors' representations of their financial condition set forth in their bankruptcy schedules and statement of financial affairs. Chapter 13's administrative transaction costs are three to four times greater than Chapter 7's. Chapter 13's will require a monthly payment stream for 3 to 5 years whether or not there really is any disposable income from which this payment can be made. Chapter 13's do not provide a debt discharge until the conclusion of the 3 to 5 years and credit markets refuse access to these debtors prior to receipt of the discharge. In Chapter 7's the discharge order comes in approximately 4 to 5 months and credit markets (ie. car lenders) will deal with debtors (albeit at a higher rate) after the receipt of the discharge. Chapter 13's plan currently have a high failure rate (ie. most debtors default on their Chapter 13 plan payments and never get their discharge). No lawyers will represent Debtors with the new liability provisions. Without lawyers the already high Chapter 13 failure rate will skyrocket. The net effect is hundreds of thousands/millions of American middle class people (the divorced, ill, injured, layed off, and failed entrepreneurs) will no longer get discharges and no longer be able to function as productive members of the American economy. All this at time when we are likely looking at a coming housing bubble correction, interest rate spike (accelarated by government budget and trade deficts), and dollar sell off.

And for what? I understand that MBNA and other credit card issuers have contributed a great deal to Senators for the additional leverage on Debtors that this bill will give them but is that enough to vote for a bill that is harmful to the interests of the American economy and its middle class.

There are other bad things in the bill and if your office would to discuss them further feel free to correspond to arrange the same. Thank you for your time considering this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #109
156. Thank you so much, MadMark...
You have been very helpful to me in explaining what is going on to my friends at work and in general.
I truly appreciate your presence here in the underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #156
174. amazing letter: thanks MadMark: I'm using the info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willy Lee Donating Member (925 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #80
154. A recent report showed that over 50% of all bankruptcies are from medical
disasters. You know, cancer, heart attacks, pesky little life threatening illnesses. With an alarming number of people losing medical insurance coupled with ever increasing medical costs, is it no wonder people cannot keep up with bills?

The % of people who file for bankruptcy because of reckless spending is actually quite small. And I think these folks should be made to pay back their bills.

Dems tried to attach an amendment that would exclude those who fell under the medical catastrophy segment of the population. That repubs feel good about themselves for making it impossible for average citizens to find reasonably priced medical coverage than bend them over the barrel when they can't pay for these medical costs is inexcusable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zoeybug Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #80
191. some additional ugliness
Some other things that bother me about this bill:

Credit card companies have decided to lend money to people who are high risk & likely to be unable to pay back the money. Due to this higher risk, they charge these people higher interest rates, sometimes over 30%. If you suddenly become a high risk debtor (by paying late), they'll raise your rates then as well. The banks have already figured out how many people are likely to default on their loans, and set the rates and fees accordingly so that they can make a profit. The banks are making a risky investment, which they believe will pay off.

So - the credit card companies are willingly taking a risk. Sometimes risky investments don't pay off. It's a cost of doing that sort of business.

Also - they struck out the amendment to the bill that would have helped people in the military that have hardships due to being a called up to serve. I think that is disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #56
135. So will it become law in 180 days after * signs it??
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 02:11 AM by SoCalDem
What about a consititutional challenge?? The Mccain Feingold law was challenged and lost of it was gutted..

Is there any organization out there willing to challenge it in court??

Watch the suicide rate climb.. of course that will "help" on the SS "problem"..:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #135
139. I believe your are correct on the effective date. I don't think the bill
is unconstitutional, just unconscionable. I agree this will result in some suicides and that is sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
54. And who's surprised? Dem or repug, they're all the power structure.

The last two decades have seen the complete take over of our government by the corporate power structure. Politicians are part of that power structure. They beg for money from the corporations, so why are we surprised when they vote the way instructed by the CEOs?

We must remember that politicians now have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in common with you and me now. They all live within the beltway. They all attend the same parties, given by the same power elite. The fact that they may bear different party labels has no meaning anymore. The fact that they maintain local offices is only meaningful at campaign time when they use the advantages of office to crush any upstarts that challenge their power. They have BECOME the power elite.

I had hoped that Dean could do something to stem this tide as head of the DNC, but I think that hope is now gone. And most Americans don't give a shit, as long as they can keep up with the Jackson trial and watch the latest survivor. Well, it looks like that attitude is about to jump up and bite them in the ass. It's they that will be screwed by the bankruptcy bill and all the other pro-corporate policies now in vogue. And they don't yet even know it because they 'don't enjoy politics'.

It will be interesting to see their reaction to having to wear the chains of indentured servitude. Will they see their children starving and rise up and demand change? Or will they as usual be content with their bread and circuses and settle into their role of slavery? The latter, I think. Tho I should be delighted to be shown wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. This bill should be made more simple....
You have to make six figures annually in order to be able to file bankruptcy. Everyone else goes to debtors prison. It's a no-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. You hyperbolic suggestion is already reality in some states that
allow payday lenders. The lender solicits post-dated checks at funding and if there is a default a crime has been committed and the matter can be referred to the law enforcement and this threat is a routine part of debt collection now. Guess who funds the payday lenders, the major CC companies under different names. Guess what the only source of credit for people who are frozen out of discharge by the new bk law, payday lenders. Its the CC companies end game. And buy the way, and I know its obvious, payday lenders fees and rates as a matter of ordinary course usurious (22-30%). Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #59
93. actually they can't criminally prosecute you
My sister works for one of those places and they actually aren't permitted to do that. They can, and will, sue you and garnish wages but they can't get you arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #93
118. I attended a meeting between a sheriff's officer and a debtor who informed
the debtor that if he didn't make the nsf check he would take action. You tell me what state law prevents the payday lender from making a criminal complaint on an nsf check? Threats of making the complaint maybe sanctioned by extortion laws but I am unaware of any bar to actually making the complaint. And I believe the collectors for payday lenders walk right up to extortion line in their collection practices and make if very clear to debtors what the potential criminal consequences are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #93
179. Not yet...
...watch for the Repugs next bill to establish debtor's prisons.

Sorry for the sarcastic outlook.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
57. Political Suicide
Shame. Canada is looking better everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
60. Should I Assume The Accuracy of Democratic "yea's" is correct?
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 07:51 PM by coreystone
Is there a roll where the "no's" are recorded? I just want to make sure that all my guys voted that way.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Click the link, then click the 2nd link
The original story has a link to the roll call vote. You can see how everyone voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
61. Is there a Republican cause that Ken Salazar hasn't voted for?
Sorry Colorado dems, but it looks like you've elected another Ben Nighthorse Campbell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #61
134. Umm, you got Campbell's name wrong- it's Ben TURNCOAT Campbell
:-)

And yeah, Salazar is turning out to be a Major League DINO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
64. I guess you just have to print off the list and never forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heyphillip Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
65. Dems voting with republicans
Why the fuck is Lieberman still in the demorcratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
66. I suggest starting a DU party, its representatives will have to follow
DU's leading voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
69. That's the last straw
Biden talks the talk but votes rethug. He's on my shit list now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
73. This is a sad day.
This is an immoral bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #73
98. Moral Bankruptcy Bill
Fuck it, what's the point of framing when we have 14 Pierre Lavalles on "our side"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #98
186. No framing involved.
It is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
75. The question is WHY? Are these leaders owned by Credit card corporations?
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 08:35 PM by shance
We need to know. These leaders have consciously voted against Americans and voted in favor of fascism and further control by Corporations.

Why? They owe us an explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #75
81. You need to ask that?
Of course they're bought and paid for. Look into campaign contributions and I bet you'll find the same names with money from MBNA, Capital One, Visa, you name it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #81
92. Then Americans need to know it. We read about this information here
but most Americans havent a clue.

THis needs to be brought to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #75
108. DLC check, anyone?
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 10:48 PM by PassingFair
brb....

ON EDIT: Of the 14 "dems" who greased the wheels for this travesty,
12 are DLC members.

The question is, what are we going to do about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #108
125. Are they currently active DLC members?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #125
128. From what I could tell...
all but Biden and Byrd are active DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #125
129. Here's a link of currents in states and U.S. Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
77. How many turncoats will vote for John Bolton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #77
87. Oh I hate to think about that, but it raises a question...
Related to that, headlines presented on Google News very often seem to have some positive premise about him. Is their search algorithm programmed or rigged to dig out positive stories on rightwing killers like him?
What gives?
What is with Google News?

Also, to me, more than ever in the last three days, there are nothing but lauditory headlines for Bush thrown up by the Google News engine.

Is there an alternative as a continuously updated breaking news site? Its getting worse lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockerdem Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
78. Somewhere, Karl Rove is laughing his ass off
On too many bills, he doesnt have to lift a finger to get his crucial legislation passed. His political (so-called) "opponents" do the dirty work for him. Very, VERY disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #78
110. and slapping his dashboard Jesus!!
this is pathetic! May they all hit rock bottom financially and suck ass trying to crawl back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #78
150. They Are Not Only Traitors. They Are Fools!!!
Yes, KKKarl is laughing his ass off. Right now the Republican Party is rubbing their hands in glee at the prospect of running candidates against these 14 Democrats in the Senate.

Think about it. It's set up perfectly. These 14 will lose thousands, if not more, votes from Democrats, and low and behold we'll have 14 new Republican Senators. Hello super Republican majority. Hello Supreme Court Justice Jerry Falwell and Attorney General Pat Robertson. GOODBYE AMERICA!!!

I'd give my left nut for a real opposition party right now.

These Dems have symbolically fucked themselves in the ass without a condom, or a "reach-around".

They've symbolically cut off their nuts and given them to the Republicans to hang on the rear-view mirror.

They've made a deal with the devil, and they expect the devil to play fair the next time their up for reelection.

I'm no Pat Buchanan fan, but it is time for pitch-forks and torches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue to the bone Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
79. Perhaps Byrd was sleeping when he voted....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
84. If anyone here starts talking about Biden as a candidate I'm going to
blow a fuse. He 'talk pretty' on corporate TV, but he's no Dem, He and the others deserve the Zell Miller DU Traitor Award of the Day.

If Byrd is going to vote against the bill, but he votes yes now - it must mean that he isn't up to the filibuster, because they seem to let him do most of it. since Wellstone is gone.

If Wellstone were alive, he would have the filibuster all organized with a timetable for speakers and he would be there organizing it all with Byrd and beating the drum.

I hope we learn that Byrd has a tactic in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
88. The dems are no different thn the repukes...
Shit like this happens all the time. Behold the proof of their corporate allegiance and fealty to the almighty dollar. We have no representation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
90. C'mon DLC apologists, tell us to shut up and trust the Party more.
Spin, spin, spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #90
119. Not holding my breath....
there are about 5 posters conspicuously missing from this thread. Maybe they're too busy Dean bashing to come and try to patch thing us. Maybe they're hoping this thread just dies...
like every other populist outcry...
Time to flush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushcrab Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
91. Lieberman's got a messy brown ring around his chops
and it ain't chocolate.

Is there a shit list posted somewhere that ranks these betrayful effers by how they've voted in the past? Shame on these maggots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
94. It doesn't make sense
Its pretty clear we need a thrid party.

Or THEY need to leave, and have a thrid party.

It just doesn't make sense. Why would Byrd support this? Couldn't Byrd be persuaded to vote with the party that opposes bush, and his attacks on the poor and elderly?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belab13 Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
96. Lieberman's still a democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
100. I think what bugs me the most is many of these will ultimately
vote against the final bankruptcy bill and when people go to check their voting records, it will only say they voted against the final bill. This kind of procedural dance has been going on for a long time under the radar, with no one but people like us paying any attention. I'm sure places like Project Vote Smart will only record the final vote when saying where these people stand on the issues.

I wish the Democrats would stand firm on the procedural hurdles and amendments, not just the final vote that goes on the record. All the steps matter, not just the final vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
102. How many repubs voted NAY?
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 10:02 PM by HypnoToad
Seems more important to me right now.

Only for curiosity sake; they're worth keeping an eye on - maybe they'll become Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #102
136. NO Repugs voted NAY.
How come the so-called Dems NEVER stick together as a party the way the Repugs do?

Spineless bastards or bought-and-paid-for corporate whores?? And which is worse?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
105. A TRAJIC DAY! THE END OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?
I fear..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #105
130. They lost me almost 10 years ago
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 12:56 AM by depakid
salvage rider (logging without laws) strike 1

welfare deform (boy, that's turned out dandy) strike 2

telecommunications bill (remember when there used to be good radio?) strike 3.

When Bill signed that one, I marched right down to the post office and registered Pacific Green.

And I remain convinced that until a substantial number of people do the same- or at the very least re-register independent, the Republicrats in the party will continue to have free reign to hoist corrupt, far right policies on the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
106. And yet
there are some here who blindly fund the Democratic party.

Next time there is a fundraising drive here, can we add a condition to our group donations that they cannot go to support any conservative candidates?? Can we name names in the condition?

If we cannot do this, then we could be funding the conservative corporate cronies like Joementum and the radical religious rightists like Zell Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #106
120. Those of us who have little faith in the DNC as a whole
do not join in the DU pleas for donations to the DNC. We give to individual candidates and local politicians. Those threads asking DUers to give should have disclosures in them warning that the donations could support these lobbyist puppet congressmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #120
149. I suspect
that the majority is in that crowd who does not blindly support the DNC. Last donation round, for example, there were 1000+ donations. There are 65,000 registered users here. Sure, half are trolls or inactive, but do the math with the remainder. It means that only 3% of DUers donated last round.

So let's do something stronger than just adding a caveat to the donation request. Let's poll people on DU about who they want to donate to or give them other significant choices. Let's start formulating a plan to organize the tens of thousands of people here who don't like the Liebermans and the Zell Millers. Let's pull the donation rug out from underneath the Democratic party, so that it actually reflects its constituents' progressive views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
107. well, happy 2 see Feinstein
changed her mind. It only took about a million phone calls 2 get her 2 act like a dem.

Why the f*ck do we vote 4 these people if we have 2 hound them to pay attention 2 Democratic principles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
122. biden I find slimey.
byrd, conrad, and stabenow I am surprised by.

lieberman sucks ass.

i despise nelson (fl) thats my useless dino.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillMoyer Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
123. Maybe this might be an excuse to send out some Spineless Citations
Maybe this might be an excuse to send out some Spineless Citations.
For now you have to print them out yourself. We are looking for someone to write an application to do an on-line version. Please check this tool out and tell me how we can improve it.

http://backbonecampaign.org/page.cfm?id=64

Best,
Bill Moyer
Backbone Campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
126. this is disgusting....
....how much more of this am I supposed to take? Who in the Party decides whether a member is a member-in-good-standing or not, and where the hell are they? These people are Republicans....if you're voting like a Republican, then you're a Republican....what hell else would I need you for, except for your vote....

....these people need to be out of the Democratic Party, or I do....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
127. So, we all know what to do when the next credit card offer arrives?
That's right, you head to the nearest lawn & garden shop, purchase a brick, wrap it in brown paper, tape the business reply envelope to MBNA/Citibank/Wachovia/Whoever and drop it in the nearest mailbox.

Simple, effectively expensive on a per-piece basis and truly satisfying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
98geoduck Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #127
132. Would it work on a sack of manure? Gardening season is coming..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
98geoduck Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
137. The "Leave No Bank Behind" Bill. Puppet strings for all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
140. I am going Green. That's it for me. Fuck these republican plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #140
141. Why bother to vote at all? Hell the elections are rigged and the
dems are doing nothing about it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #141
143. I thought Dean would be making noise
"Oh John-John why did you have to leave us"???

We need a Dem Savior!!!!!!

I'm afraid that even here the phrase "Your either with us or against us"
is enough to send the weak shivering.

Damn, I guess those 2 Wars my daddy fought were for naught. I'm glad he isn't here to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
144. A Strong and Viable THIRD PARTY FOR THE PEOPLE
AND BY THE PEOPLE is LONG overdue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
145. Byrd puzzles the heck out of me by being on this list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
146. Someone tell me if there are any retroactive time limits on this bill...
...once Herr Busch signs it into law. If there are, I need to move quickly.

Additionally, how soon after Herr Busch signs this abomination does it become law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
152. Republicans voting with us: Chafee, Snowe, Collins, Specter
heard this on Unfiltered show on AAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
155. I just e-mailed Bill Nelson (FL)
I hope he gets a flood of e-mails from pissed-off folks, just like me.

Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
161. My letter to Carper
Sen. Carper,

I am VERY disappointed on your vote for the bankruptcy bill.
Are you aware that almost 1\2 of the bankruptcy's are because of health catastrophes?
And why would you not fight for people to save their homes?
I voted for you, because I cannot stomach what these neocon republicans are doing to my country.
However, you seem to be not that much better.
Tell me, how much pressure did MBNA put on you for this sickening example of "Democratic" values.
What next? Debtors prison?
How about telling MBNA and their ilk to NOT GIVE CREDIT to borderline people?
Oh, I forgot, there is no profit in that.
I, and many others, will not forget this blatant DINO vote.
If I wanted a republican to represent me, I would have VOTED for one.

Sign me
Disgusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
162. ****** PLEASE HELP Stop the House Quislings now *******
There's another thread with a BUNCH of Dems in the House who will support the bill. They should all be bombarded now with emails, calls, etc.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3242118

Rep. Ellen O. Tauscher
Rep. Adam Smith
Rep. Ron Kind
Rep. Artur Davis
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy
Rep. John Larson
Rep. Stephanie Herseth
Rep. Dennis Moore
Rep. Mike McIntyre
Rep. Joe Crowley
Rep. Jay Israel
Rep. David Wu
Rep. Diane Hooley
Rep. Melissa Bean
Rep. Jim Davis
Rep. Harold E. Ford, Jr.
Rep. Ed Case
Rep. Jay Inslee
Rep. Shelley Berkeley
Rep. Gregory W. Meeks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #162
181. Isn't the deed done? Once the senate votes for cloture the ability to
attempt a filibuster is lost right? Its my understanding that the House does not have a similar filibuster mechanism. Now its subject to simple majority which the democrats can't stop if even the quislings turned around. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #181
185. yes, but a few
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 03:02 PM by BlueInRed
Republicans may join us on the final Senate vote (4 I believe) and it is always possible (even if very unlikely) that we will have enough House Republican defectors IF the House Democrats stick together. At a minimum, a show of unity would help us run against moderate Republicans in 2006.

I think the final Senate vote will be very unified, with maybe 4-6 Democratic defectors, rather than 14. I'd like to see a similarly unified House Democratic vote, which might scare the moderate House Republicans into defecting for fear of being defeated in 06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #185
193. I have to say that those 14 that then vote against the bill are in
some ways more sickening than those that vote for it because you know that they will then say years later at election time,"I voted against the bk bill" when in fact they insured its passage with this procedural vote and their Master, MBNA et al, will appreciate the subtlety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #193
196. I totally agree
and unfortunately, since I started paying attention 4 years ago, I've seen it happen many times on important bills. Most people don't keep track of the procedural stuff and have no idea the person scuttled the bill, then made a token vote against it in the end.

I'm glad some websites have now started keeping track of this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamsta1 Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
163. Even Jeffords voted "Nay"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
170. Mary....Mary.....yet again quite contrary......
....hide and watch as the constituents you don't represent anymore...refuse to vote for your DINO ass for four more... :puke:

She's LOST all credibility as a Democrat and won't get my vote ever again. :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
171. I'm surprised to see Byrdie's name (D-WV)..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #171
173. Is it *possible* that they voted to end debate so
as not to waste any more time on it, nor to give the bill any more joementum?

And are still planning to vote *against" it?

I'm just wondering, and am quite bad at this strategery stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #173
175. Oh yeah: Biden

some of you probably saw the broad hints that gannon-guckert has something on Biden.

I think it was over at Kos.

Ganno said something on-air to the effect that, after watching Biden on Bill maher's show, he was *very surprised* that Biden hadn't mentioned that they knew each other some years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
176. And due to current election laws, voters have a choice...
Keep these traitors or allow an even worse whore for corporations to take over for them.

We need to end corporate donations to campaigns, end corporate-sponsored junkets, and implement representational voting... NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
187. when we decide to pull together they will too.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue to the bone Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
195. Hey Senators! Your pre-approved retirement is in the......
.....mail!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saskatoon Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
197. How can thet justify this
Lieberman? well that traitor was a given but I am devastated by some of these people. What in hell motivates them. I am so disgusted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
198. I'm so disappointed in Robert Byrd
He was my favorite senator. How can we ever get Democrats elected if they won't offer a real alternative to Bush and his cronies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
199. Kennedy is still talking about this bill live on C-SPAN right now
If the debate has ended, what's he up to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
200. Assholes All !!!




:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
204. They haven't voted on the bill yet
have they ? Sorry, haven't been keeping up on this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #204
205. No, the final vote is apparently tomorrow. This was to stop any
further debate and amendments. It sacrificed the right to filibuster, among other things. I imagine many who voted with the Rs on cloture will switch sides on the final vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #205
216. Well then, it ain't over til' it's over.
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #216
217. I think this was the last opportunity to stop it
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 06:49 PM by BlueInRed
with less than a majority. So really, it's almost a technicality. I don't believe we have the votes because 6 or so Dems are committed to voting for the final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
206. Someone explain to me how Salazar is a step up from Campbell.
It seems to me that on crucial votes Salazar votes the same way that former Senator Campbell would have voted. So...how is this guy any better?
I'm sorry...I don't think that just because you have a "D" after your name that means squat. I'll still take Snowe-R Maine, over Biden, Liebermann and Salazar any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
209. I'm kicking this so these 14 MBNA Whores can further enjoy their
moment in the DU sunshine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #209
219. I'm assuming MBNA was a big donor for these DINOs?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
211. Byrd?
WTF? I am DISGUSTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
213. Sen. Durbin - this bill is a gift to the crdit card industry
Senator Durbin just spoke (C-Span2). Paraphrase: "The Senate is giving a great gift to the credit card industry. Instead of addressing the underlying causes of bankruptcy, the Senate is going to punish the victims."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delilah Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
214. Are any of these idiots
from states that allow recall elections? I'm relieved to see that neither of my senators are on that list, but if they were, you can bet I'd be talking about a petetion right about now.

Obscene, thats what this bill is. I cannot believe its even under discussion, let alone being voted for by dems.

STOP THE PLANET, I WANT OFF!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinoza Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
215. Byrd--
What can you expect from a racist ex-klaner. Lieberman--big fucking surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
218. Screw those 14 moneygrubbers....
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Salazar (D-CO), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea

If your Senator is amongst them, be sure to work hard to oust their greedy, faux-republican, asses in the next election. I'm HAPPY to say my Senators are NOT amongst them. Wonder how much CREDIT CARD COMPANIES ARE PAYING SENATORS THESE DAYS????????????????? They're rich, and their isolated from reality. They have their lives totally paid for.. forever.. just for serving a few years. Must be nice. Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrCorday Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
223. WOOT! DEM my Ladiez!!
YAY for Washington state! Cantwell and Murray stayed on the blue side! Shall be writing letters to thank them.

Sorry about Stabenow. Biden lost my interest in a possible Presidential bid. And Salazar? Aw, how could you?

We need to quit doing this. A 55-45 is hard enough. Now we go and make it like 75-25? Agh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
224. Forwarded to DNC
I've forwarded this to a member of DNC, who lives a couple towns over, with a preamble explaining our frustration at these DINO's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC