Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China's bloated army of 46m bureaucrats worries ruling elite

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 04:27 AM
Original message
China's bloated army of 46m bureaucrats worries ruling elite
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/08/wchina08.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/03/08/ixportal.html

China now has 46 million government bureaucrats, new statistics revealed yesterday, a number almost as great as the entire population of England. While the country is used to outdoing the rest of the world for sheer numbers, the explosion in officialdom is alarming its ruling Communist Party.

Its excessive and corrupt bureaucracy was regarded as one of the principal causes of the decline of imperial rule. Yet there are now 35 times as many people on the government payroll, even as a proportion of the population, than at the time of the collapse of the Qing dynasty in 1911. Corruption aside, today's civil servants are also expensive, requiring official cars, holidays masquerading as training sessions and receptions.

Hu Jintao, the president, has his own reasons to take on local officials. He is trying to make his mark by distinguishing himself from his predecessor, Jiang Zemin, a number of whose supporters in the provinces were tarnished by corruption scandals in the 1990s. The move comes as some overseas economists and analysts are re-evaluating China's notorious corruption, suggesting that it may have played a positive role in the country's economic growth.

Officials who profit on business deals are more likely to encourage investment, according to the argument, with the practice of bribing customs officials to overlook import tariffs reducing the costs of trade by up to half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, but they're cheap. $1100 per year average.
That's only about US$51 billion a year? Did I calculate that right?

I got that $1100 number from an Al-jazeera article this morning about capping the salaries of top execs at the state-owned companies at 14 times the average salary of ordinary employees. I found that reasonable.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FAE877C3-BAEE-4F2C-938C-49C7101B5A7D.htm

China to cap salaries for state CEOs
The government is considering setting salary ceilings for management, concerned that incomes of executives in some companies have reached 10 to 30 times that of their lower-ranking colleagues, the official Xinhua news agency reported on Monday.

"The state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission is working out a plan to limit the maximum annual salary of the SOE (state-owned enterprise) top management," Xinhua quoted former Shanghai mayor Xu Kuangdi as saying at a panel discussion during China's annual session of parliament.

"The initial standard is likely to be set at no more than 14 times the average salary of ordinary employees," he said. Average per capita urban incomes are about $1100 a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, at the artificial 8.28 Yuan to the Dollar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. May 10, 2011, Washington Post story "US to set CEO cap".
"A a new law proposed and supported by the Democratic majority in the house and senate today would cap any salary of any employee of any corporation doing business within the US at 15 times the US minimum wage or the equivalent in the corporations home monetary unit in the case of foreign corporations". President Barbara Boxer, the first female US President said today she supports the bill, "it fits nicely with the US Medical Service created in 2009, giving all Americans free health care", said President Boxer. Asked how the US could enforce it's law on overseas corporations the President replied "if they want to do business in the US they will follow our rules, period, end of story". Ms. Boxer is known as "one feisty prez" as quoted by Sec of State Biden, who must "sell" the new US programs to our overseas trading partners. The new fair trade policies are having a huge effect on the US economy as manufacturing jobs have increased 10 fold in the last two years as all countries doing business in the US MUST comply with US wage laws, work place safety rules and environmental regulations. China's leadership complained again today that US policy was having a devastating effect on their economy, "we're working with China to help during this readjustment period" Sec Biden commented. In other related news the former Wal-Mart CEO, complained that the Democratic Majority's handling of the economy was what brought down the retailing giant and forced into chapter 11 bankruptcy last year. Many economist disagree and a recent letter by Fair Trade USA, a pro labor thinktank, stated that Wal-Marts decline was a direct result of the American worker becoming tired of the unfair treatment by the former "world's largest retailer" and finally flexing it's "collect muscle", The so called "worker's revolt" in 2009 cut Wal-Marts US sales by 75% in just 3 months and world-wide sales declined by a staggering 90% as Wal-Mart was given the boot by countries like Canada and France, the retailer never recovered.



I'm not much of a writer but I can dream nice dreams huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Vert nice dreams.
President Boxer is really quite feisty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, you are a good writer!
That was very well done, and a wonderful vision it is. May it come to pass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socialistdem Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. How many bureaucrats does the US have?
Just curious...federal + state + local (city/county)...

What is the total # of people working for government in America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. They need another cultural revolution to weed the garden.
Too many bureaucrats have forgotten that they're supposed to be serving the people, not themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow! Almost the same percentage as Pennsylvania
Population: 12,365,455

Public employees: 569,356 (4.6%)

(Source: U.S. Census bureau.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC