Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyers' Panel Indicts Bush, Blair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:19 PM
Original message
Lawyers' Panel Indicts Bush, Blair
Lawyers' panel indicts Bush, Blair


By Julian Ryall in Tokyo

Monday 07 March 2005, 19:03 Makka Time, 16:03 GMT  


US President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair deserve life sentences, with the possibility of parole after 25 years, for the war crimes and genocide in Iraq, according to a lawyers' panel.

Speaking on Monday at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Japan, Kohki Abe, a professor of law at Kanagawa University, said they should face the "maximum penalty available". That would not include the death penalty, however, as the members of the tribunal opposed capital punishment, he added.

<snip>

The tribunal found Bush guilty on 13 counts, Blair guilty of eight crimes, Koizumi guilty on four counts and Arroyo guilty of aiding and abetting the other defendants of crimes of aggression and crimes against humanity, Abe said.

Bush is guilty of genocide for the use of "devastating" economic sanctions, as well as war crimes for attacks against civilians and the use of indiscriminate weapons, such as cluster bombs and depleted uranium weapons. The attack on Falluja also makes him guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity.

<snip>

Abe added: "I have to emphasise that these acts should have been prosecuted in other venues, such as the International Court for Justice, but for legal or political reasons these four defendants are unlikely to be prosecuted.

"The international civil society has set up these tribunals because we cannot let these acts go past without the criminals behind them being tried."

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D8C1C363-308C-41F7-8B32-935312621768.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. At least somebody speaks
my language..way over there in Toyko!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Meaningless. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But the thought is nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not meaningless!! Without power to implement perhaps, but not meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It is authority that gives meaning to a court.
That "court" has as much standing and authority as if a group of lawyers here on DU decided to hold a court and issue a similar statement. They represent no one but themselves.

It is like masturbating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't disagree with the premise of your comment. I just see it as having
some meaning. With your analogy in mind you are right it is like masturbating yet it would still draw some to know there are different ways to skin a cat or in this case, jerk a load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nice thought though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush and Blair are banned for life from the Church of Nativity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sa-weet! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. A powerful statement from the Church of Nativity
Thank you for this link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sadly, even if all charges were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, a
preponderance of the American people just don't give a s**t. Mock quote "Just make sure there's enough gas for me to fill up my SUV, and I don't really give a diddledy-s**t how we came by it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC