|
It's sad and funny at the same time... I know that the Repugs and Shrub and the rest of them keep bringing up this bizarre justification for torture. That somehow causing great pain and distress (physically and mentally) can be justified on the basis that information desperately needs to be extracted from these poor sods, to prevent another 9/11.
It's most commonly called "the ticking bomb" rationale -- the scenario being, "Would you torture someone, if you knew that in doing so, you could get information that would save countless lives?"
Of course, the assumption always goes that the suspect is already PRESUMED guilty, and the information is there to be had.
We know now what happens when you even head a little bit down this road. You get people who've done nothing wrong, aside from being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and they're tortured until they say something the interrogators want to hear. And I'm sure the torture doesn't stop then either, because, well, you have to be certain they really said it, right?
I have come to the conclusion that torture -- the intentional infliction of pain on a prisoner is 100% wrong, all the time, whatever the situation. Yes, maybe lives could be saved if you wrung a key bit of information from someone who is guilty of complicity in mass-murder. But you never know ahead of time whether you really do have the right person -- and even more importantly, sometimes the cost of saving lives is too high. Just look at the damage done so far -- and they haven't stopped! They're still trying to justify and legalize their actions.
We need to spread this meme loud and far: The Republican Party is the party of legalized torture.
|