Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOD announces V Corps units will return to Iraq as early as April

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:58 AM
Original message
DOD announces V Corps units will return to Iraq as early as April
http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=27142
...V Corps headquarters and six of its major commands will return to Iraq sometime between April 2005 and January 2006, according to a Department of Defense announcement Friday....

...V Corps is still led by Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, who served as the top commander in Iraq until he was replaced by Gen. George Casey in July 2004.

It’s unclear if Sanchez will be put in the awkward position of returning to Iraq in a more junior role. Tours for corps commanders are typically two years, but are often extended to twice that.

Under the shadow of the Abu Ghraib scandal, Pentagon officials are so far mum on whether Sanchez will be offered another assignment — requiring another round of confirmation hearings before the Senate — or retire.
.....
Wonder how they are going to handle this: let/make him go back to Iraq, promote him, or tell him eat it or go home...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Eternal war
I sure feel sorry for all of these people. They get used time and time again. Not the country they were raised to defend anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if V Corps will return to the states when they are
finished like what happened to 7 Corps after the first gulf war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What happened to 7 Corps
after the first gulf war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. 7 Corps was shipped out of Germany
to spearhead the attack in Gulf War 1. When the war was over instead of sending them back to Germany they were sent to the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are folks in the military are aware of the plan for a Permanent Presence?
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 06:30 AM by leftchick
or do they beilieve they will be coming home sometime in 2006?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2281&ncid=742&e=5&u=/thenation/20050118/cm_thenation/132132


Though the media ignored Kerry's statement and failed to do any substantive follow-up research, his comments were well-grounded in reality. On the day of the debate the Christian Science Monitor spotlighted the findings of defense specialist John Pike, whose website, GlobalSecurity.org, located twelve "enduring bases" in Iraq, including satellite photos and names. In March, the Chicago Tribune reported that US engineers were constructing fourteen such long-term encampments--the number Kerry referred to. The New York Times previously placed the number at four.


While the exact figure may change, suspicions of undisclosed US imperial plans--exemplified by permanent military bases--rightfully linger. Before the war, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz suggested moving US troops stationed in Saudi Arabia into Iraq. In October, a survey by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes found that two-thirds of respondents disapproved of a permanent military presence, even though more than half thought the US would build the bases anyway.


Now comes a report in the New York Sun by Eli Lake revealing that the Pentagon (news - web sites) is building a permanent military communications system in Iraq, a necessary foundation for any lasting troop presence. The new network will comprise twelve communications towers throughout Iraq, linking Camp Victory in Baghdad to other existing (and future) bases across the country, eventually connecting with US bases in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Afghanistan (news - web sites).


"People need to get realistic and think in terms of our presence being in Iraq for a generation or until democratic stability in the region is reached," Dewey Clarridge, the CIA (news - web sites)'s former chief of Arab operations (and Iran-contra point man), told the Sun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. "Realistic"?
Since when is anything based on reality in this administration?

If one were to be realistic, one would realize that there has never been an "enduring" empire bringing "democratic stability" (what an oxymoronic juxtaposition of words there) when said empire is the world's largest debtor and most out-of-control rogue nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. "BRING EM ON" shouted the AWOL CHIMPANZEE
"All you fools who pay taxes OPEN YOUR POCKETS", he continued.

War without end people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC