Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big Oil's Burden of Too Much Cash

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:31 AM
Original message
Big Oil's Burden of Too Much Cash
The New York Times
February 12, 2005
Big Oil's Burden of Too Much Cash
By JAD MOUAWAD

Born from the megamergers of the 1990's, the world's giant oil companies have delivered on their promise. They have cut costs, increased returns and raised profits to records. Now, flush with cash, they find themselves in a paradoxical position - they are making more money than they can comfortably spend.

Thanks to crude prices that averaged $41 a barrel in New York last year, the world's 10 biggest oil companies earned more than $100 billion in 2004, a windfall greater than the economic output of Malaysia. Together, their sales are expected to exceed $1 trillion for 2004, which is more than Canada's gross domestic product.

~snip~

"The net effect of $50-a-barrel oil is to reduce opportunities," said Paul Sankey, an analyst with Deutsche Bank in New York. "Large profits make governments think that they're not taxing sufficiently enough."

For example, the Russian government collects most of the profits when oil prices rise above $25 a barrel. Some countries - including Kuwait, Angola and Iran - put limits on the gains foreign companies can make if prices rise above a certain level. In many production-sharing agreements, for example, oil companies agree to a revenue cap, so that when prices rise, producers must reduce their volumes. "The industry would much rather have lower oil prices and more stability and a more sustainable environment," Mr. Sankey said. "Record prices mean record revenue, but also too much attention for an industry that basically likes to remain out of sight."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/12/business/12oil.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. They like to control from the shadows. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Shadow economy + Shadow government = BushCo®
The perfect item of national control. Big oil and big paramilitary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe they should invest in "cold fusion" or something good fir MANKIND
Maybe they should invest in "cold fusion" or something good for mankind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. "cold fusion" is a myth, it never worked.
If it did, you'd be driving a cold-fusion car right now. And don't use the argument "Big Oil is keeping the secret from being discovered"
The nuclear fusion physicists (you, know, the guys who spend their whole lives studying this stuff) say it's impossible.
However, normal fusion, which is getting to be very well-understood, offers the most promise. What's needed is the final spark, the ultimate concentration of energy on the smallest particle to start fusion.
We're not there yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes I know it didn't work. But those in corporate heaven making
Yes I know it didn't work. But those in corporate heaven making so much money they simply cannot put it all into their own research or into the stockholders pockets should do what many great corporate citizens have done ore the years - put it into researching the World's problems. Since they are oil companies it would make sense for them to invest in alternative energy (so that in 20 years some alternative source of sunlight cell will be available to combat empty Oil Wells).

That is what a real corporate citizen will do - when they are too rich and have a cash flow problem - they need to put it into 'seed' money to make the world better. And doing so locally in the USA would be a good idea (since the SS estimated 2042 implies the USA will not be going through great growth). So the cash heavy corporation should really be doing something to help out the American Worker and creating a Whole New Industry through technical research seed money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Note the focus on mid-east sources
...that they don't have access to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. The concentration of economic power is unconscionable
Big Oils CEO's advise Bush and Cheney - so we only have window dressing on alternative energy, or even raising CAFE. No progress.

These same Big Oil CEO's buy off Congress -- and starve the nascent alternative and renewable energy industries -- and those alternative energy startups that look promising Big Oil kills with vexatious and frivolous patent lawsuits (altho they are joined in this with the Big Three). Maybe the energy industry needs a Greg Aharonian!

And, their "dabbling" in international politics cause more harm and prolongs resolvable conflicts. - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=124

I spent a career in alternative and renewable energy. NEVER worked for a mainstream energy company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. A lot of oil is burned by countries trying to develop their economies.
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 11:28 AM by AP
Those huge profits represent a shift in money away from countries trying to build themselves up to create more health, wealth and happiness for their citizens into the pockets fo a few very wealthy and large private companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC