Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General Says the Current Plan Is to Maintain 120,000 Soldiers (thru 06)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:15 AM
Original message
General Says the Current Plan Is to Maintain 120,000 Soldiers (thru 06)
So the over $100 B drain for Iraq and Afghanistan this year will continue for long, long, time.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/25/politics/25army.html

January 25, 2005
TROOP STRENGTH
General Says the Current Plan Is to Maintain 120,000 Soldiers in Iraq Through 2006
By ERIC SCHMITT

ASHINGTON, Jan. 24 - The Army's current plan is to keep about 120,000 soldiers in Iraq through 2006, roughly the same number that are fighting there now, a senior operations officer said Monday.<snip>

In a briefing for reporters, Lt. Gen. James J. Lovelace, the director of Army operations, said the projection is for the Army staff's planning purposes only. Actual troop levels follow the recommendations of combat commanders, based on the evolving security situation, and subject to approval by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. But he said the plan represents the "most probable" level under current assumptions.

<snip>
Bush administration officials have repeatedly said they are counting on newly trained and equipped Iraqi forces to begin replacing American troops in securing the country, perhaps as early as this summer. That could allow the Pentagon eventually to start withdrawing the 150,000 troops who are there now - 120,000 Army soldiers and 30,000 from the Marine Corps, Air Force and Navy.

Because the Army is by far the biggest supplier of troops in Iraq of any of the armed services, the fact that its top operations officer is not planning for any troop reductions any time soon is yet another indicator of how the Iraqi training program is lagging woefully behind original Pentagon estimates. <snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. So much for all the rumors
about bringing them home after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yesterday I Saw The Same Article Say We Would Stay Through 2007
Has the media re-censorship already started on these comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yep - media truth is what the owner wants to have you see/hear! :-)
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. It makes no difference
to those with their eyes on the prize of selling oil. The people who really pay taxes will continue to fund this ethnic clensing while those who pay no taxes make sure that the people they paid off, and the lies they spread, makes them mega bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Allenberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wrongly forced-into-retirement GEN Shinseki had it right
when he said "beware the 12 division strategy for a 10 division Army."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HboRc3 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. not a surprise
The military talking heads on the cable news channels have been saying this for awhile now. They've been estimated it'll be 2006 or 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockerdem Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is another indication that the Shiites are complicit with us
This whole election is for the benefit of the Shiites (and the Kurds, somewhat). Im beginning to believe that the Shiites are in the bag with us. Because if they werent, we would be run out of Iraq in a heartbeat after the election. Quietly, these guys have made a deal, that includes permanent bases. Id bet my firstborn if I had one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. duplicate topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC