Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Panel Gives Rice Confirmation Nod

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 12:02 PM
Original message
Senate Panel Gives Rice Confirmation Nod
Senate Panel Gives Rice Confirmation Nod

20 minutes ago White House - AP Cabinet & State


By BARRY SCHWEID, AP Diplomatic Writer

WASHINGTON - The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted Wednesday to confirm Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) as secretary of state after two days of hearings in which she faced strenuous Democratic assaults on the Bush administration's handling of Iraq (news - web sites).


AP Photo


AFP
Slideshow: Condoleezza Rice

Rice Vows to Mend Frayed Diplomatic Ties
(AP Video)



Pending approval by the full Senate, Rice would be the first black woman to hold the job. She was confirmed by a 16-2 vote with Democrats John Kerry (news - web sites) of Massachusetts and Barbara Boxer of California voting no.


Other Democrats, including ranking member Joseph Biden of Delaware, had said they were reluctantly voting to elevate Rice to the nation's top diplomatic job. A vote by the full Senate was expected by Thursday.

snip http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050119/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/senate_rice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WahooJunkie Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Grrrr.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TolstoyAndy Donating Member (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course they did
wimps and pink tutus.

It wouldn't be polite, don't you know;
and the pResident should always get whomever he wants.

How are other countries going to be able to look this
lying murderer in the eye and conduct business without
automatically assuming she's cheating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rice A Roni
Out of the pot and into the FIRE. Good luck, your gonna need it!

Bu$hco is using you for chum now, the sharks are near.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sleepless In NY Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Nice inaugural gift for bush, don't you think?
2 out of 16 voting nay. Why don't the democrats just wear a sign saying "Kick Me" on their backs? It would save everyone alot time. Condi just got a free pass on 9/11 & Iraq. And bush got a nice inaugural gift from the democrats. How touching.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. BROTHER!!!! - What did you expect them to do?????
Please tell me what a totally partisan vote would have accomplished???
If all the Democrats on Foreign Affairs voted nay on Rice she still would have passed out of committee due to a straight party vote.

And Democrats who have a large amount of respect would have suffered such as Biden for example.

You would be slitting you throat in a figurative manner and for what gain???

Like it or not the Democrats are in the minority and they need to pick and choose their fights wisely. Trying to torpedo Rice would not have been a good move and it would have been completely futile.

Might have felt good, but that good feeling would come with a large political price tag.

Better to get ready for the coming fights on Iraq money appropriations, Social Security and Taxes (to say nothing about Judges, Supreme Court and other wise).

I admit to being a recent convert (3 years) to the Democratic Party (recovering Republican) but I want the Dems to prosper and this would not have worked, either politically or media wise.

Try explaining a negative vote against a African-American woman, the pundits of the right would have a field day.

I want a good fight (forcing a 2 hour debate on voting issues when the electoral votes were authenticated was one) but not tilting at windmills.
:toast: :dem: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Excuses. The media & GOP will be mean to us if we fight.
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 02:36 PM by Dr Fate
So sick of the excuses.

Your post could have just have well been written in the days after the 2000 election, the days after 9/11, doring the Iraq vote or in the days after the 2002 mid-terms.

ALWAYS an excuse for why we can stand up against the liars & criminals.

I guess the media will now give us favorable coverage and the GOP wont "Swiftboat" any of our candidates now, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Suffered? of course!
"And Democrats who have a large amount of respect would have suffered such as Biden for example."

Of course if people stand up to these fascists, they are going to suffer, but the alternative is to acquiesce and let them continue ruining the coutry.

Have you seen the movie "Iron Jawed Angels"? It was nominated for the Golden Globes. Those women had to endure prison and plenty of other suffering. Suppose they had wanted to avoid suffering? Then women would not have gotten the right to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It has nothing to do with suffering
or the avoidance thereof. Biden to me is a thoughtful statesman of the Democrat approach to foreign policy.

I again point out that it would have been a futile stand. Nothing of any purpose would have been accomplished by a no vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Disagree
A no vote would simply say that this candidate is not qualified or suitable for this position. The basis for a no vote is her absolutely incompetence as National Security Advisor and her far too chummy relationship with *. Neither * or Rice has credibility among allies and other nations now. To promote this liar to Secretary of State is to further the diplomatic damage. Democrats could defend this easily and it would serve to remind folks just what a liar Condi has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Okay then who should be SOS??
You know it will not be a Democrat, Bush would never do that.

So you are going to get some one who has a least a partial neo-con outlook.

I also think that Rice is as least as qualified as Albright ever was.

The only difference between the two is political outlook.

I think we descend a slippery slope if we engage in total war on any and every issue. Can the enthusiasm be kept up for the duration?

Bush is president, I don't like it and you don't like it but it is not going to change.

As such he is going to appoint some one who shares his views to positions of high office, that is a fact of life.

I do not think a total opposition approach on every matter is a constructive one, and do not forget that the GOP will not hold all the levers of power for ever and when they do not do you want them to be as recalcitrant as we have/may been/be?

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Not total opposition..
This is an extremely important position. Powell humiliated the US with his outpouring of BS and total lies at the UN. He choked on it before he gave it, but he gave it anyway, sealing his reputation as a soulless shill for Bush. Rice was part of that total disinformation campaign. She failed miserably as NSA and she contributed much to our poor relations with our allies. She was unqualified to be NSA and she has done nothing to show competence at diplomacy. Her "mistakes were made" forced out of her with no specifics attached, four years later doesn't cut it.

Gonzales and Rice are lines in the stand. Let Bush find a person with some independence and credibility, not one of his toadies. Appointing Rice is proof that there is some heavy shit in the State Department they want no one out of their little club to see.

I don't expect to see many Congressional Dems show some spine here, but by God they are going to hear from me about it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I want to believe you, I really do
Seriously. I'm looking for a "why" here.

Since the Republicans have made it abundantly clear that their idea of bipartisanship is putting their plans out there and having the Democrats agree to all of them -- and no back talk, mind you -- I don't know what we have to lose by fighting them tooth and nail.

Is there truly anything to be gained by diplomacy here? Where is the fight they're avoiding this time -- in the Senate? In the press? I'm a little confused. We're going to pay that political price tag should we opt for anything than complete capitulation. I just don't see that we have much to lose by fighting.

Help me see this as a positive thing, please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. JerseygirlCT - Put that way you make a very
good point!!

"Since the Republicans have made it abundantly clear that their idea of bipartisanship is putting their plans out there and having the Democrats agree to all of them -- and no back talk, mind you"

Maybe their is nothing more to lose.
:think: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Rats!
I really was hoping you had something hopeful and strategic to make me feel better!

It's not in my nature to be confrontational or obstructionist. But it sure seems like that's the only language they speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Oops. Sorry. This should go under Wisc Badger's post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. "BROTHER!!!!" --- I'm not your brother and go easy on the ! key
Pardon the snap judgement, but I disagree with everything that you have posted here and I will disregard any future posts of yours. If the other Democratic members of this committee can't summon up enough intestinal fortitude to challenge the appointment of this shallow, sycophantic, neo-con cheerleader to the position of Secretary of State -- then they are worthy of contempt.

I challenge you to provide more explanation of the vague terms you used: "large political price tag", "suffered such as Biden for example", "Better to get ready for the coming fights", etc. Try using more words to present your point, rather than trite bullet points.

When the future battles that you list come around, I predict that you will be encouraging people to hold off for the next battle.

A line must be drawn. Gonzales is one. Rice is two. The Democratic members must stand for their principles, even though (and despite of) the fact that the result will not change. It's not just the result, it's the process.

I don't care how many smilies you put in your posts, I do not consider you to be on my side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. And this is exactly why so many Dems voted for IWR which led directly to
losing the elections in 2002 and 2004.

We need to vote what we think, and any Dem who thinks Condi Rice deserves their vote for SOS is no friend of mine. I wouldn't vote for hair plug Biden for dog catcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow, another 'fair and balenced' news report...
Using these words, "strenuous Democratic assaults", sure show where the writer of this article leans. Asking for honest answers is considered as assaults? Geez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Secretary of State Olive Oyl.
The cartoon face of Caricature Nation. Green Acres, we are there.

:eyes:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Mad props to Kerry & Boxer
I just wanted to thank them for doing the right thing. They'll have a clear conscience later on down the road, once everyone's had a chance to see just how much she can REALLY screw things up.

And did I hear the voters correctly on the radio today? Is Senator Obama on the committee....(?) He doesn't have much leeway of choice but to follow Biden's lead, he's a newbie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I thought it was odd...
that the media pointed out that Kerry and Boxer were the only two to vote "nay" about Condasleaza's appointment...

But it doesn't surprise me that she is in now...our politicians have no backbones anymore...except for Kerry and Boxer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. hey Kerry bashers.........................
this was a HUGE act by Kerry today (along with Boxer).

He stood up for America's wounds after 9/11 and Iraq's "mission accomplished" bruhaha. Thousands of soldiers and tens of thousands of innocents have been murdered, for what? For WHAT? FOR WHAT BUSHCOCK!


We thank you Senators.


Keep fighting. PLEASE someone tell Kerry that we appreciate this action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Rice
"Kerry and Boxer both lambasted Rice Tuesday over the administration's handling of postwar Iraq, with the former charging that “the current policy is growing the insurgency and not diminishing it.”

Boxer, going further, accused Rice of twisting the truth to build up a case for the U.S. invasion, which stirred Rice to counter that the senator was impugning her character."





AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW BAD MEAN AWFUL SENATORS MAKING DOCTOR RICE ANGRY, AND YOU DON'T WANT TO MAKE HER ANGRY, SHE TURNS INTO THE INCREDIBLE SULK!!!!!!!!!! "DON'T YOU IMPUGN MY CHARACTER!! WAHHHHHH!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. And "nay" from someone who just returned from Iraq.
Kerry and Boxer '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Best decision Kerry has made since IWR. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Face with White House Nazis, I invoke the spirit of Andrew Jackson.
Doubtless damned to hell for his treatment of the Indians, Jackson could out-fight, out-duel and probably out-cheat Bush & company. Cowards, sycophant's & collaborators constitute the vast majority of the present democratic party. I except Conyers, Boxer & the Black Congressional Caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm shocked that the Dems gave in, AGAIN!!!
Way to get a backbone. Great. And the DNC asked me for money today. Kerry says I have to stop Rumsfeld. I'm getting sick of running this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROUDNWLIBERAL Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. No Longer a Democrat
As a long time Democrat and a Union person I have now left the Democratic Party. Hell, I've left the country---moved to New Zealand---just watching Amerika die a slow death---hope it goes faster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
30. And the world laughs at us......
Condiesleaza and her "husband" Doofus have further eroded what little cred the US has left. Statesmen arounfd the world are snickering. We need a Thomas Jefferson or a Benjamin Franklin and what do we get?..... a blithering SYCHOPHANT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC