Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-spies trying to sue CIA for broken pledge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 09:21 AM
Original message
Ex-spies trying to sue CIA for broken pledge
Edited on Wed Jan-12-05 09:26 AM by NNN0LHI
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0112scotus-spies12.html

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court considered Tuesday whether shadowy spy deals should ever end up in federal court, hearing the case of former Soviet-bloc spies who claim the CIA reneged on a pledge of lifetime support.

At issue is a 130-year-old Supreme Court ruling that said former spies may not sue the government because of the secret nature of their pacts, which are made with the understanding that "the lips of the other were to be forever sealed."

Most justices appeared reluctant to allow the couple's lawsuit against the CIA. They noted that not only spies but government officials accept that they might be backstabbed when making clandestine deals.

more

Could Cold War spies sue the CIA?

http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=143&sid=5461128

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An attorney for two former Cold War-era spies has told the U.S.
Supreme Court the husband and wife should be allowed to seek lifetime pay from the CIA, but the
government has contended that spies have no such legal rights.

The couple are former citizens of a Soviet-bloc nation, identified by the pseudonyms John and
Jane Doe. Their lawyer, David Burman, argued on Tuesday that they have a right to make their
claim for pay in the courts, a view held by two lower-court rulings that their lawsuit against the CIA
could proceed.

A government lawyer replied that their case must be dismissed, based on an 1875 Supreme
Court ruling that he said bars any lawsuits over the failure to pay money promised for spying.

"When you enter into an espionage relationship, you recognize you have no protection under
the law," Acting Solicitor General Paul Clement said.

Since the days of Nathan Hale, who spied during the Revolutionary War and was executed by
the British, spies have had no any legal recourse, he said. He called the spy relationship "a
contract the law doesn't recognize."

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. duplicate topic, please discuss here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC