Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recount to start on Alabama amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 06:33 PM
Original message
Recount to start on Alabama amendment
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apus_story.asp?category=1110&slug=Alabama%20Amendment

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- Election officials will begin recounting votes Monday on a narrowly rejected ballot measure that would have removed segregation-era language from the state Constitution.

The amendment was defeated by 1,850, or .13 percent, according to the final vote tally. Alabama law requires an automatic recount if the margin is within a half percent.

The amendment would have removed un-enforced language mandating racial segregation from the state Constitution, which was written in 1901.

Secretary of State Nancy Worley said she doesn't expect the recount to change the final election results, "if all the correct procedures are followed." She said most counties will finish the recount in one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demrock6 Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why would anyone want to keep that stuff in the Constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. gosh, I don't know, weird huh?
perhaps it's because they're homophobic, racist, misogynist, xenophobic, red-necked, hate mongering, war mongering, fundamentalists, hypocritical, fascist loving pigs?


That, or it could be that they're just stupid.


God bless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Could be both
Yeah, it's both.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Or
Perhaps it's just a tad more complicated than that, ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, I don't...I've read about it, and the Christian Coalition decided
to try and muddle the issue by saying this would mean all kids might be entitled to an education in the satte of Alabama, and we can't have that!

So--either they're racist, or idiots, or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You left out "in-bred"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's not what the CC said
The CC said the amendment might open the door to have federal judges mandate tax increases to pay for education. They framed it as a tax issue and there was no one campaigning for the amendment to counter that distortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. They really are opposed to public financing of education, ...
... and we really will see wingnuts begin another round of attacks on public education soon.

But a vote against this amendment was simply a vote for racism: "You can go ahead and vote as a racist by telling yourself blah blah blah."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. They also told them that Federal Judges would be able to tell them...
to raise taxes for educational improvements, despite the fact that the governor raised taxes last year for that very purpose. I guess when the Christian Coalition leader tells you something from the pulpit, it's God-Breathed. :shrug:
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Think?
Sorry, we're south-bashing here. Thinking is somewhere in another thread. :eyes:

Seriously, as you kindly pointed out, it is more complicated. This is one of those issues that can be enlightening about why Republicans vote the way they do. Roy Moore and his cronies made this debate about taxes, not about segregation. They stressed that the courts had already overturned segregation and claimed that this amendment was a back-door effort to raise taxes. Many did argue otherwise, Democratic Congressman Artur Davis and the very conservative Birmingham News for instance.

But you had on the one side a well-financed loony group led by a cult figure (Moore) who is willing to lie to win, and on the other people who just said, hey, this is the right thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Gotta hold on to those old Southern traditions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. You also left out they are members of the racist Republican Party and
usually ignorant rightwing religious conservatives. The well know dirty little secret that nobody in the media every talks about. If it wasn’t for the racist the repukes would not have carried the south and they are shrewdly pandered to by the repuke leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charon Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Why would anyone
Are you surprised that this would happen in Alabamastan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Democrats Should Use This As A Wedge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellis Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Good Point
Jesse is using the disenfranchisement of black people in Ohio to get voter Fraud out in the open-We could also very easily use rascism as one of our "moral" values.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Republicans can't be racists, they got Rice, Powell and Thomas
and that's enough oreos for me to know that the old testament Christians aren't racists! praise Jesus Bush /sarcasm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. half full or half empty
at least 49.9 voted to strike the language. So there is hope, we have nothing to gain by constantly mocking the nutcase majority in the south. There is a base of wise, progressive open minded people in Alabama and we need to help them convince more people about the good that will be gained by progressive, liberal politics.

ps what the hell were 50.1% thinking? dumb crackers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It further discredits them
One can say that they voted to keep segregation on the books, and that the christian coalition campaigned for it.

When they start foaming at the mouth about things like gay marriage, we can say, "But you also voted to defend segregation in 2004."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vajraroshana Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. fairly sizable amount voted no as a protest vote
There's a sizable number of folks in Alabama that vote no on every proposed amendment no matter what as a protest in hopes of having the state constitution completely redone. Alabama's is the largest constitution in the world and is hopelessly messed up. To redo piecemeal every single vile thing in the state constitution would take hundreds of years. So the theory is to punish the state by voting no on everything until it precipitates a crisis big enough to have it completely re-written.

And of course the CC and Roy "ten-commandments" Moore said it was a backdoor attempt to force more taxes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. This was allegedly due to fear of federally mandated tax increases
God forbid that the state of Alabama should actually have to generate revenue to match the funds that they siphon from the federal government.

At first I doubted whether that was really the reason that the amendment was rejected, but on second thought I find it easy to believe that the Christian Coalition would oppose higher spending on education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC