You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: We used to have at least a semblance of real debates [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. We used to have at least a semblance of real debates
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 10:27 PM by woo me with science
until Ross Perot ran for President and scared the hell out of the two corporate parties.

From the 1970's until Ross Perot ran for office, the League of Women Voters managed the debates, and there was at least some attempt to provide time for actual questions and relatively in-depth answers, direct questioning and response between candidates, and follow-up.

After Ross Perot shook up the system, the RNC and the DNC took immediate steps together to gain control of the debates, including format and qualifications for entrance. The League of Women Voters was aghast and withdrew in disgust, issuing a strongly worded press release:

"The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."

The League of Women Voters' sponsorship was replaced with the Commission on Presidential Debates, run by the RNC and the DNC. Talk about a conflict of interest. Now we have a fluff-fest. Sixty-second commercials from each candidate, with thirty-second follow-up, and tight controls to prevent any serious competition by non-approved candidates.

The Commission on Presidential Debates is just one more example of how our election process has been restructured in order to ensure that the corporate-chosen candidates do not face serious scrutiny or challenge. The RNC and the DNC do not want a substantive debate, or challenges to the corporate commercials. Imagine Rick Perry having to conduct himself in a real, three-hour question-and-answer session with real follow-up. Imagine Sarah Palin or George Bush in a real debate format.

We have to reform the entire damned system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_debates

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC