You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: Oh horseshit. Obama and D's, even according to RACHEL MADDOW, gave us the most PROGRESSIVE agenda & [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. Oh horseshit. Obama and D's, even according to RACHEL MADDOW, gave us the most PROGRESSIVE agenda &
VAST amount of accomplishment we've had easily since LBJ if not FDR. You need to stop the whining. Have you ever had to govern a frigging thing? You do what is possible. You do what you can with the votes you have. You need to re-watch Rachels' piece and get the hell real. Whine whine whine. Excuses excuses excuses. Purist pipe dreams. Your one of these "Well they deserved it," types who excuses inexcusable whining, laziness, and apathy. Yes, I saw the chart and it doesn't tell the whole story by any means. Here is what else the numbers say: Nationally only 42% of the electorate voted. The R base was fired up. In most places, ours whined and/or went into a silly stupor. MORE older and thus conservative voters voted. MORE CONSERVATIVE leaning voters overall voted. More I's who DID vote voted R. What is also shown between the lines, and what was true, is that R's and their friendly I's were much more engaged, much more motivated, AND they voted in larger numbers. Too many D's/Progressives bitched and/or went to sleep, and now they are REALLY bitching. Well, any damn one who didn't vote deserves what they now have. Try growing the hell up and ENGAGING next time. As to Obama's centrist tilt, you CAN NOT WIN THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY TODAY WITHOUT WINNING THE CENTER, and that is the plain truth. I suppose you think Clinton is also too "conservative" although his presidency has a 60+% approval, he won twice, and damn well would have won a third time if he could have run again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC