You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: You are either misinterpreting what he said, didn't read what he said in full or spinning it... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
19.  You are either misinterpreting what he said, didn't read what he said in full or spinning it...
....A la Raw Story.

An exit strategywas the "main statement". He was/isn't talking about "OUT NOW!" as your poll suggests.

"Now, together with our NATO allies, we have almost 100,000 troops in Afghanistan. Any abrupt reversal
of existing US policy, including the abandonment of Hamid Karzai and his government, and the prompt
withdrawal of US forces might have serious adverse consequences far beyond Afghanistan. AI Qaeda
would claim credit, terrorist recruitment would surge, subversion within the states allied and friendly
with us would intensify, the stability of democracy in neighboring Pakistan could be further undercut,
and US power and prestige might be seen to wane.


On the other hand, the longer we stay, and the larger our force, the more resistance and resentment
that we create, by our disruptive influence, by the casualties we inflict deliberately and accidentally. We
are a foreign element there in a culture which doesn't tolerate diversity. However appealing it is to us to
say, we won't quit, this mistakes American will as the potential weakness, whereas in actuality it is the
strength of our resolution, our persistence and determination which cause difficulties in the region.
There is an Islamic revival underway, a struggle to cope with the spiritual impact of modernization and
globalism, and that revival draws energy from the antagonism our presence creates. We need to find
our way out, seizing credit for such successes as can be achieved, for the region is better dealt with from
a distance than with our presence, and especially not with military presence ..

The approach I would recommend is focused on an exit strategy. The best exit would be after the take
down of the top AI Qaeda leadership in Pakistan. This is an objective about which discussion has been
publicly suppressed, and it probably should remain so. But I hope it will be foremost in the minds of the
Administration.

In the meantime, in Afghanistan, our exit strategy must be built around four factors: attempting to
reduce the level of violence by seeking a political amelioration of the conflict. Greater assistance to the
government of Pakistan in dealing with the AI Qaeda and Taliban remaining in Pakistan, economic
development in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and developing a more capable security structure for the
Afghans.
"

http://armedservices.house.gov/pdfs/OI111709/Clark_Testimony111709.pdf">Details



------ ---- ------




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC