Reply #3: Yea, you're right... [View All]

[one_voice]

that's part of the problem. But it's not the n word per se, it goes deeper than that.

The fact that she has an issue with Park51 being built because it stabs the heart of Americans, and it's insensitive versus Glenn Beck and the MLK thing. He called the first African American president a racist and then does that. People are objecting to it, she doesn't give a shit that it offends or stabs these people in the heart.

She tweeted about the term "feminist" being hi-jacked by a cackle of rads" and then remains silent on the "who let the dogs out video".

She blasted Rahm E. for using the word "retarded" cuz it's insensitive, but let's have all the free speech you can swallow on the "n" word.

It's her double standard, it's that she will not tolerate dissent. This is how she would govern, and that's a very scary thought. There's no room for any other view/opinion than her own. Large segments of the population would be completely ignored, maybe even punished in some way for speaking out. They're already talking (the re-thugs)about constitutional changes,can you imagine what kinds of things she'd want to change. She sees things a certain way and in her mind that's the only way.

Sometimes I think we dismiss how dangerous she could be and that she could be a potential threat to the Dems. God help us if she's ever gets to the presidency.