You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #92: Nicolas Sarkozy is trying to maintain French culture [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #90
92. Nicolas Sarkozy is trying to maintain French culture
Why isn't it hubris for Muslims to come to that nation state with it's determinedly secular constitution, much more so than ours, and demand the right to wear this kind of patently misogynistic garment that's also strictly cultural?

The French have the right to determine what will be acceptable in their public square. They have a history of banning religious gear in public, they have a very secular constitution and a culture that does not embrace face covering. Those who come to that country should have a reasonable expectation about what they will face in emigrating. Personally I believe France has done a terrible job integrating it's foreign population but that doesn't change the facts of French culture, history and their rules about what's appropriate dress in public. The women may feel "dehumanized", "portrayed as an invader" but frankly, none of that is new for any immigrant wave for any country. There's going to be culture shocks and discussion about what makes it into the melting pot of the blended society and what gets banned (FGM is banned for example). Virtually all immigrants feel exposed and uncomfortable - that's normal. What's not normal is to then retreat from even trying to assimilate and then blame everyone else.

Burqa/niqab bans have nothing to do with imperialism and I'm having a bit of a laugh over your stretch.I don't buy that argument for a moment. That type of shrouding is meant to make a woman disappear, faceless and anonymous. That's not imperialism - that's cultural misogyny and you can't lay that at the face of imperial aggression in any meaningful manner. It's usage predates any western imperialism or western demonization.

Right now it's taking on even more charged tension as it's being used as a political statement by radicals, so much so that even Islamic cultures are looking to ban it.

This type of clothing has meaning, context and connotations that the west is right to reject imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC