You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: And mcdonalds was fine with the event [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. And mcdonalds was fine with the event
After all, it went on for three years. Their objection is to the applications by McFest, LLC to trademark that name. Anyone can file an objection to a trademark application. The company (hm, why isn't it a 501(c)3 instead of a for profit LLC?) is spending the money to fight for a trademark to prevent others from using it. McD's is fighting to keep the term open. Why is a small, supposedly charitible for-profit company spending money on a trademark fight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC