You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #210: The vaccine is the live virus. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
210. The vaccine is the live virus.
Edited on Thu Jan-15-09 11:57 AM by lumberjack_jeff
http://pediatrics.about.com/cs/commoninfections/a/shingles_4.htm

"The vaccine is a live attenuated strain of the chickenpox virus," says Philip R. Krause, M.D., lead research investigator in the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. "However, it's a weaker form so it gives rise to a milder infection. But in the course of giving rise to this milder infection, it induces enough immunity to prevent people from getting the natural infection." It is estimated that the vaccine is between 75 and 85 percent effective in preventing chickenpox. "But the important thing," says Krause, "is that it is almost completely effective in preventing severe cases of chickenpox."
Now that we have a chickenpox vaccine, are shingles and PHN on their way out? Although the FDA hasn't evaluated the effects of the vaccine on shingles, Krause believes that "in the long term, if you can prevent enough people from getting the wild (natural) type of chickenpox, you're likely to see a beneficial effect on the incidence of shingles and post-herpetic neuralgia. But it may take several generations for this to happen."


There's a 15-25% chance that the child will still get the more severe natural infection even after having the vaccine, and no evidence that they'll be immune from shingles.

There's only a qualitative difference between immunizing children through the attenuated virus and the natural one. Natural is more severe but more effective at preventing future infections.

I have three children, born in 1991, 1993 and 1998. The older ones both had the natural virus (before the vaccine was available) the younger had the immunization at 18 months. At age 3 he was diagnosed with Autism.

I'm not convinced there's a connection, but there you have it. I do not see the decision to blanket immunize as being clear cut at all.

DU is schizophrenic. We are proud of our freethinking heritage and our distrust of big pharma, right up until the topic is immunizations, at which point anyone who doesn't take parenting advice from Pfizer is a child abuser.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC